Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mt. St. Helens - alert level lowered 10/6, 10 AM PDT

Posted on 10/06/2004 10:18:59 AM PDT by djf

The United States Geological Service has lowered the alert level on Mt. St. Helens from a 3 to a 2.

http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Volcanoes/Cascades/CurrentActivity/current_updates.html

For a description of the alert levels and schemes,

http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/Products/Warn/WarnSchemes.html

Alert level has been lowered because quake activity has dropped off.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: eruption; mtsthelens; volcano
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2004 10:19:00 AM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: djf

Don't let your guard down!!


2 posted on 10/06/2004 10:28:05 AM PDT by Pyro7480 (Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

I know. I'm watching the Cedar Flats seismo, and activity has dramatically increased in the last 90 minutes or so.


3 posted on 10/06/2004 10:30:01 AM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: djf

But the HTW has decreased during that same timeframe.... I wonder if they turn up/down the gain on the seismograms (recalibrate) and that is what we see sometimes when the graphs suddenly change character like that (when it's not reflected on other charts).


4 posted on 10/06/2004 10:57:07 AM PDT by BagCamAddict (NEVER FORGET. THE THREAT IS REAL AND PRESENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: djf

Correct - all three graphs are showing increased activity the last hour or so. But my question is, why did this massive dropoff in activity take place PRIOR to the Tuesday eruption? Looking at the charts in the wee hours of Tuesday, the quakes fell off dramatically.

BUMP for amatuer seismo-watchers...


5 posted on 10/06/2004 11:04:31 AM PDT by dandelion (http://johnkerryquestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: djf

They were talking about lowering it to level 2 when I was driving in to work Tuesday a few hours prior to the steam and ash eruption.


6 posted on 10/06/2004 11:10:18 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf; 007Dawg; 11B3; 123easy; 1911A1; 4woodenboats; 7mmMag@LeftCoast; A44MAGNUT; Abram; Acrobat; ...
Washington State Ping List

This is all known Washington State FReepers and interested parties as of 10/1/04 - 320 FReepers

If you want on or off this ping list Freepmail me.

7 posted on 10/06/2004 11:11:52 AM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf
From the USGS update [emphasis mine]:

October 6, 2004 9:15 A.M., PDT

Following yesterday morning’s steam-and-ash eruption, seismicity dropped to a low level and has remained low. Low-level tremor observed following the eruption is also gradually declining. Lack of earthquake and rockfall signals suggest that deformation of the uplift area on the south side of the 1980-86 lava dome has slowed. Brief visual observations this morning from Coldwater Visitor Center showed weak steam emissions from the crater. We infer that the vigorous unrest of the past few days has lessened and that the probability of an imminent eruption that would endanger life and property is significantly less than at any time since Saturday, October 2, when the alert level was raised to Volcano Alert (Level 3). Therefore, we are lowering the alert level to Volcano Advisory (Alert Level 2).

Such decreases in the level of unrest, which may reflect a decrease in the rate of magma movement, have been common at Mount St. Helens during eruptions in 1980-86 and also at similar volcanoes elsewhere. Episodic changes in level of unrest over periods of days to weeks, or even months, are possible. We don’t think that the current episode of unrest is over and we expect fluctuations in the level of unrest to continue during coming days and months. Everyone should be aware that escalation in unrest and perhaps an eruption could occur suddenly or with very little warning. There may be little time to raise the Alert Level before a hazardous event occurs. Therefore, we continue to monitor the situation closely and will issue additional updates and changes in Alert Level as warranted.

8 posted on 10/06/2004 11:19:56 AM PDT by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Anyone got links to current seismagraph, thanks
9 posted on 10/06/2004 11:21:41 AM PDT by meanie monster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: meanie monster

You should see the volcano cam now!


10 posted on 10/06/2004 11:22:38 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I appears to be just a low cloud cover. The whole region is cloudy, as opposed to the clear skies seen the past few days. In other words, back to normal.


11 posted on 10/06/2004 11:27:35 AM PDT by NorseWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

What's the link for the cam, again?


12 posted on 10/06/2004 11:27:40 AM PDT by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: djf

Oh no! What in the world will Greta talk about, then?


13 posted on 10/06/2004 11:28:25 AM PDT by exit82 (Righteousness exalts a nation...... Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative cat

http://www.fs.fed.us/gpnf/volcanocams/msh/


14 posted on 10/06/2004 11:29:45 AM PDT by meanie monster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conservative cat

I just don't know what to think. It is anyone's guess what this puppy is capable of.


15 posted on 10/06/2004 11:31:18 AM PDT by meanie monster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: djf

It would be terrible it Mt Saint Helen erupted with damage to life or property.

But damn it, it would suck even worse if it happened under cloud cover! We have cameras up the wazzo and I expect pictures! I expect video! Damn it, 24 hour cable is supposed to have me covered.


16 posted on 10/06/2004 11:33:38 AM PDT by shadowman99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadowman99
LOL, I really miss the Bahgdad Cam too, BAD
17 posted on 10/06/2004 11:45:54 AM PDT by meanie monster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: shadowman99

If there was a serious eruption, they could probably get film from above the clouds, I doubt cloud cover is much more than 13,000 feet or so.

When it went in 1980, ash went to 60,000 feet. It was quite spectacular.

Sposed to clear up tomorrow, then cloudy on Friday again.


18 posted on 10/06/2004 11:46:10 AM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

link please???


19 posted on 10/06/2004 11:47:45 AM PDT by pollywog (Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pollywog

See above


20 posted on 10/06/2004 11:58:46 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson