My hero...!
/swoon
Posted on 10/04/2004 1:11:51 PM PDT by Exton1
Former FBI agent, Cleon Skoussen, in 1958, in his book, THE NAKED COMMUNIST, revealed among other things, these long term goals of the communist agenda. The information is in the Congressional Record August 1963 and in the Communist Manifesto:
My hero...!
/swoon
Thanks for pinging me to this. I'd say they can borrow the "Mission Accomplished" banner and pat themselves on the back. Isn't it funny that you and I have many times discussed that the cold war continues and we've pretty well identified all of the programs and ideas from this list as communist and here we find that in 1958 we were given fair warning.
"You've come to fight as free men... and free men you are. What'll you do without freedom? ...and dying in your beds many years from now, would be willing to to trade all the days, from this day to that, for just one chance, Just one chance... to come back here and tell our enemies, that they may take our lives... but they'll never take our FREEDOM!!!
Freedom will prevail!
I remember seeing a picture of General MacArthur's picture at my father's American Legion post that loomed over the huge dining room, and the quote undeneath said, "We shall fight, or we shall die..."
Big "Hanoi Kerry is a Communist" Bump!!!!
Read later...
Page 156:
While Communist espionage channels were being perfected in the United States, similar subversive networks were being built throughout the world. Soon Stalin found the state secrets of all the major powers pouring in so fast that he was able to play the world-wide game of power politics like a professional gambler who sits at the poker table carefully planning his strategy as he reads the marked cards held by each of the other players.
We now know that it was from this supremely satisfying position of political omniscience that Stalin initiated a series of schemes which had their part in precipitating World War 2. Defected Russian Intelligence officers have revealed that World War 2 was fomented and used by the Russian leaders as an important part of the long range strategy for the expansion of World Communism.
Page 156:
The Rise of Adolf Hitler and Nazism in Germany
It is said that Communism was largely responsible for the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. It will be recalled that when the German Kaiser capitulated in 1918 the Communists tried to take over Germany. Anticommunist political groups immediately sprang up and through a frantic coalition they prevented the Communists from seizing power. It was this anticommunist atmosphere that Adolf Hitler began his political career.
(snip)
...[Stalin] recognized in the Nazi dictator a formidable opponent of his own breed and kind. He saw that Hitler was shrewd and ruthless. He was completely amoral. He had no compunction whatever against violence, the purging of his own people, the use of deceit in propaganda, or the sacrifice of millions of lives to achieve personal power. Materialism had produced precisely the same product in Germany that it had produced in Russia. Although called by different names, Nazism and Communism were aimed at the same identical mark and were forged in very similar ideological molds.
OPINION:
Sounds like the Log Cabin Republicans and the Victory Fund Democrats.
(SNIP)
Page 162:
The U.S. Policy of Coexistence Goes into its Third Stage
(snip)(snip)
Nevertheless, the program (coexistence with Communism/gain cooperative support of the communist leaders to preserve peace) was inaugurated and America’s attitude toward Russia both during and after World War 2 can only be understood in terms of this policy.
In early June, 1942, Vyacheslav Molotov came secretly to Washington and stayed at the White House. After his departure preparations were made to break the new U.S. policy to the American people. On June 22, 1942, (the anniversary of Hitler’s attack on the U.S.S.R.) a Russian Aid Rally was held in New York’s Madison Square Garden. There a top government official announced: “A second front? Yes, and if necessary, a third and a forth front...We are determined that nothing shall stop us from sharing with you all that we have and are in this conflict, and we look forward to sharing with you the fruits of victory and peace”. Then there followed the pathetic, but blindly hopeful statement: “Generations unborn will owe a great measure of their freedom to the unconquerable power of the Soviet people”.
Page 163:
The Story of American Lend-Lease to Russia
The American policy of generosity immediately began to manifest itself. Billions of dollars of Russian Lend-Lease were authorized. Even the deliberate sacrifice of American self-interest was evident in some of the orders received by U.S. military services. An order to the Air Service Command dated January 1, 1943, carried this astonishing mandate: “The modification, equipment, and movement of Russian planes have been given first priority, even over planes for the U.S. Army Air Force”.
(snip)(snip)
Since the close of World War 2, the American people have gradually learned the details concerning the flood of goods and treasure which went to Russia under Lend-Lease. The lists which have been published are from Russian records.
(snip)
...Lend-Lease...included $3,040,423,000 worth of American goods, paid for by American taxpayers, which definitely does not appear to be authorized by the Lend-Lease act.
(snip)(snip)
In addition to U.S. planes, munitions, chemicals, tools, heavy machinery, and so forth, the amazing American “Arsenal of Democracy” provided Russia with 478,899 motor vehicles. This was nearly half of all the motor vehicles used on the Soviet Front. (snip) ...the United States never received an official “thank you” from Russia for the eleven billion dollars worth of Lend-Lease goods which were paid for and literally “donated” to the Communist Motherland by the American people. Stalin’s excuse was that his government felt the United States made an error when it stopped Lend-Lease at the close of the war.
(snip)
Page 166:
Russian Attempts to secure the Secrets of the Atomic Bomb
Throughout World War 2 Russian espionage vigorously concentrated on the most important thing to come out of the War - the harnessing of atomic energy. A two pronged thrust was employed to get the information as it was developed: one by espionage and the other by diplomatic channels. For a time the diplomatic channels were particularly productive, not only for atomic energy secrets, but for all military and industrial information.
[Major Racey] Jordan first became aware of this at the Great Falls Lend-Lease Air Base when the Russians began bringing large quantities of cheap, black suitcases along with them whenever they left the United States. They refused to let Jordan see the contents on the grounds that the suitcases were pieces of “diplomatic luggage” and therefore immune to inspection.
(snip)
...[Jordan found] a letter on White House stationery signed by Harry Hopkins and addressed to the number three man in the Russian hierarchy. ...maps of the top secret Manhattan Project, data on the atomic energy experiments, folders with ‘From Hiss’ on it, numerous military documents, Depart of State documents, U.S. embassy n Moscow giving confidential evaluations of officials.
(snip)
When Major Jordan reported the facts to Washington he was severely criticized for holding up the plane!
In April, 1943, the Russian liaison officer told Jordan that a very special shipment of experimental chemicals was coming through. The Russian officer called Harry Hopkins in Washington and then turned the phone over to Jordan. Major Jordan reports that Harry Hopkins told him: “I don’t want you to discuss this with anyone, and it is not to go on the records. Don’t make a big production of it, but just send it through quietly, in a hurry”.
The Russian officer told Jordan the shipment was “bomb powder”. Jordan saw an entry in the officer’s folder which said, “Uranium”. (snip) At least 1,465 pounds of uranium salts are said to have been sent through to the Soviet Union.
(snip)
On July 24, 1945, at Potsdam, President Truman announced to Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin that the United States had finally developed a highly secret bomb. He told them this bomb possessed almost unbelievable explosive power. Secretary of State James F. Byrnes was watching Stalin and noted that he did not seem particularly surprised. Four years later, September 23, 1949, President Truman announced to the world that Russia had successfully exploded an atomic bomb - years ahead of expectations. Some officials wondered why, with all the help they received, the Russians had not exploded one long before.
Creation of the United Nations
During August and September 1944, the representatives of Britain, China, Russia and the United States , met at Dumbarton Oaks in Washington DC. At this conference the constitutional foundation for the United Nations was laid. In it Russia was not only made a full partner, but a dominant stockholder. A most significant development was the fact that, while other nations objected, Russia insisted on the right to exercise the veto power even if she were a party to the dispute. This violated the very foundation of international jurisprudence but the democracies consented. They were ready to pay almost any price to get Russia to participate.
(snip)(snip)
On April 25, 1945, 1,400 representative from 46 nations met in San Francisco, and after due deliberation agreed upon a United Nation Charter.
Anyone familiar with the Communist Constitution of Russia will recognize in the United Nations Charter a similar format. It is characterized by a fervent declaration of democratic principles which are sound and desirable; this is then followed by a constitutional restriction or procedural limitation which completely nullifies the principles just announced. For example, the Russian Constitution provides for universal suffrage and voting by secret ballot. Then, in Article 126, it provides for a single political party (the Communist Party) which will furnish the voters with a single roster of candidates. This, of course, renders completely meaningless all the high flown phrases dealing with universal suffrage and secret ballots. (snip)
In precisely this same way the United Nations Charter provides for the “the sovereign equality of all its members” (article 1) and then sets up a Security Council which is dominated by five permanent members (Britain, Russia, China, France, and the United States) anyone of which can nullify the expressed desires of all other member nations by the simple device of exercising the veto power.
(snip)
This makes the Security Council the only legally binding legislative body in the UN. ...any nation which joins the UN must “agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council”.
(snip)(snip)
As some authorities have since pointed out, the UN provided for a world-wide police commission and then made the top international gangster a member of that commission.
(snip)
Page 174:
Communist Attitudes at the Close of World War 2
A clear indication of what the United States could expect from post-war Communism came May 24, 1945, when the leading French Communist, Jacques Duclos, wrote a letter on behalf of his Russian superiors demanding that the Communists in the United States be required to immediately abandon their policy of friendly collaboration with capitalism and return to their historic mission of world revolution. Back in 1940 the Communist Party of America had formally withdrawn from the Third International to avoid having to register as a foreign agent under the Voorhis Act. Later the Communist Party of America was dissolved in an attempt to attach the Communist membership to one of the major US political parties. For this purpose they called themselves the Communist Political Association.
All of this twisting and turning was in complete harmony with Soviet policy until 1945. After World War 2, the announced policy reverted to traditional Marxism. To justify the complete switch in policy, Earl Browder, the American Communist leader, was accused of being personally responsible for the “errors” of the former policy. He was expelled from the party.
The party leadership was immediately taken over by William Z. Foster. Foster had written an inflammatory book in 1932 called Toward Soviet America. Just before World War 2 he had testified before a Congressional Committee: “when a Communist heads a government of the United States, and that day will come just as surely as the sun rises, that government will not be a capitalistic government, but a Soviet government, and behind this government will stand the Red Army to enforce the dictatorship of the proletariat”.
It is no longer difficult to understand why Moscow wanted men like Foster at the head of its Communist Parties throughout the world. We now know that the Russian leaders approached the conclusion of the world’s greatest war with the conviction that World War 3 might be in the near offing. In their secret circles they hopefully speculated that this next war might be Communism’s final death struggle with capitalism.
(snip)
(snip)
Communist Attacks on the Free World During the Post War Period
Stalin’s plan for the expansion of Communism after the war involved three techniques: The creation of proCommunist puppet governments in occupied territory, the military conquest of new territory by satellite armies, the further infiltration of free countries by Soviet espionage and propaganda organizations.
(snip)(snip)
Page 180:
The Free World Loses 100 Million People
A primary objective of World War 2 was to liberate all of the countries occupied by the Axis powers. Russia was well aware that if she were to expand her influence into these nations, she would have to do it in such a way as to create the illusion that these nations had gone Communistic through their own political self determination. It became established Soviet Policy to take a secret but highly active interest in the affairs of these countries to make them “voluntary” satellites through infiltration and subversion.
(snip)(snip)
McCarthy saw it, and they slaughtered him
And Senator McCarthy never advocating outlawing the Communist Party (according to Ann Coulter, lib favorite Humbert Humphrey actually introduced a law that would have done this). Neither did he ever investigate Hollywood (how many ignoramuses know that?). All he ever sought to investigate and expose were Communists working for the Federal Government. It is for that that he has been turned into the greatest "villain" in American political history.
bump
When you get a chance, read this interview with his secretary:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/935830/posts?page=58#58
“# Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis. “
Sounds like what many say about Ron Paul and his ideas.
Thank you.
Excerpt:
After a second postponement, with the Communists still refusing to participate, the National Assembly finally convened on November 15, 1946, and a democratic constitution was approved and adopted on Christmas Day. But the Communists would have no part of it.
Chiang Kai-shek became completely convinced that the Communists would never negotiate a peaceful settlement but were out to win the whole domain of China by military conquest. He also believed the Communists could never represent the interests of China because their policies were created and imposed upon them by Moscow.
Time was to prove this analysis correct, but U.S. Diplomatic Strategists were the last to be convinced and then only after the Chinese mainland had been lost. Furthermore, Chiang could not convince the US Diplomatic Corps that he was justified in striking back when the Communists attacked him. When he tried to regain the territory recently seized by the Communists, it was described in Washington as “inexcusable aggression”.
“# Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.“
Sounds like what many say about Ron Paul and his ideas.
From the very beginning there have been two ways to interpret the Constitution: Hamiltonian loose constructionism and Jeffersonian strict constructionism. Even the people who wrote it roughly divided into these two groups.
Ron Paul is a strict constructionist. Just because one rejects this one tradition of Constitutional interpretation in favor of the other one which is just as old (and which was held by George Washington, btw) does not mean one is rejecting the Constitution.
Plus "palaeolibertarians" are a bizarre species whose only purpose appears to be the adaptation of European fascism to local American conditions. Otherwise how does one adapt religious orthodoxy to libertarianism? And why would any "libertarian" advocate bringing back jim crow laws (not that Rep. Paul does, but there are "libertarians" who do)?
"Palaeolibertarians" are like our leftwing "anarchists." They consider the US government dictatorial but they admire foreign dictators who are a zillion times worse. The only difference between the two groups is the names of the dictators they admire.
Well there is the third way which most elected officials and judges seem to use today. Ignore it.
I’ll quote Henry Hyde.
“There are things in the Constitution that have been overtaken by events, by time. Declaration of war is one of them. There are things no longer relevant to a modern society. Why declare war if you don’t have to? We are
saying to the President, use your judgment. So, to demand that we declare war is to strengthen something to death. You have got a hammerlock on this situation, and it is not called for. Inappropriate, anachronistic, it isn’t done anymore.”
Disaster Strikes Down an Old U.S. Ally
Finally, in the summer of 1946, when the Communists had repeatedly violated the truce agreement, the Nationalists decided to vigorously counterattack and penetrate deep into Manchuria. The diplomats frantically ordered Chiang to stop, but he refused to do so. He said another truce would only allow the Communists time to re-group and come back even more fiercely than before. He also said it was his intention to continue the campaign to forcibly disarm the Communists and restore them to civilian status so that China could get on with her program of constitutional government without fear of constant insurrection.
This line of reasoning did not appeal to the State Department. Three different times Chiang was ordered to issue an unconditional cease-fire. To make it stick a U.S. embargo was finally placed on all aid to Chiang. Only after United States aid abruptly halted did Chiang reluctantly agree to a cease-fire. General Marshall stated: “As Chief of Staff I armed 39 antiCommunist divisions (in China), now with a stroke of a pen I disarm them”.
And I'm not Jewish.
The Wedemeyer Report
...the summer of 1947, General Albert C. Wedemeyer was sent to Asia under Presidential orders to find out what was wrong in China. (snip) He indicated that not only had the interests of free China been violated, but the self-interests of the United States and all her allies had been subordinated to the whims of the Communists. He recommended prompt and voluminous aid to the Nationalist Government and predicted that the situation could still be salvaged if help were provided in time.
Unfortunately, the report fell into the hands of the very people whom General Wedemeyer had criticized. Consequently, it was buried in department files for nearly 2 years and was not brought to light until long after it was too late to take the action it recommended.
(snip)
By September, 1949, the Communist leaders were already wildly celebrating their victory as they set up the “People’s Republic of China”.
(snip)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.