They also have to compile the evidence to make a strong case. Or not.
I guess I'd make a lousy investigator. Lets see. Yep definitely papers in the pants. Hand em over. Take him to jail, boys. Case closed. I guess thats why I am just a jammie clad stay at home freeper instead of a government investigator. LOL
I wonder how long and how much tax money it takes to figure out its illegal to stuff government documents down ones pants for the purpose of hampering an investigation.
and savedbygrace replied
They also have to compile the evidence to make a strong case. Or not.
I think it is more a matter of making a strong case against all of the co-conspirators. Once Berger was caught, almost certainly on camera, violating the law, not to mention endangering National Security, I'll guarantee you that the FBI went to a judge and got wiretaps for all phones that Berger would be using. Those tapes would have led to the people he was stealing the documents for.
When you wish to charge a former President, three sitting Senators, one of whom is the current Democrat candidate for President, and probably several prominent members of the MSM, with Treason, you really need to have all of you facts nailed down.
and Poohbah wrote:
October Surprise, anyone? (evil grin)
Maybe, maybe not. If you've got that kind of evidence and it is rock solid, the best thing for the country would be to show it to the traitors and convince them to throw the election. If this Clancy like scenario plays out (exactly what happened in Clear And Present Danger, the book, not the movie) I'm looking for several October Surprises, but they'll be obviously self inflicted by the Kerry campaign.
And he wasn't gathering it for his own edification. He was getting at someone's behest and/or at someone's direction.
That is what is being investigated, I'm sure. (Evidence to make the case. After all, I'm sure we all know all ready who is involved.)