[Shryke]

I have one!

Senator Kerry, in under 200 words, pleae explain how you managed to become such a cowardly, digraceful F***tard in your short lifespan?

[Mr. Silverback]

Senator Kerry, you've called our current allies in Iraq "window dressing," and "the coerced and the bribed" among other things. You say we're no longer doing anything of consequence in Afghanistan, yet German soldiers are currently risking their lives there. You've also questioned the integrity of Prime Minister Allawi of Iraq. What will you do or say to convince new allies to come aboard, senator, when you've treated the ones we have so shabbily?

[ClearCase_guy]

Mr Kerry: Your military service is something in which you take great pride. Yet some of your military records are withheld from public scrutiny. Why have you refused to sign an F180 and make all of your military records available to the public?

[Texas Federalist]

I think we're still okay as long as he's still orange.

[searchandrecovery]

If you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be? Mr. Kerry?

[Papa Sierra]

The Wall Street Journal's Opinion Journal (http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110005721, scroll down to "Write Early and Often") has been running pieces on how the DNC provides prefab "letters to the editor" on its site regarding the debates. This allows its less creative lemmings to cut-and-paste these messages and send them to their local papers. Some of the brighter lights even sent theirs in before the debates even took place! Classic.

Anyhow, I say fight fire with fire. If you're interested, copy the letter below (tweaked from the DNC boilerplate) and send it to your own hometown rag. May not beat the spinsters at their own game, but it should water it down. No paper that gets lookalike letters from both perspecives is likely to publish either. If nothing else, it'll maybe call attention to the DNC's latest monkeybutt tactic.

Here's the text:

---

(start)

The debate between Dick Cheney and John Edwards presented Americans with a stark choice.

Dick Cheney shared an optimistic vision for the next four years: Genuine leadership in the war on terror. An economic growth plan that creates jobs and keeps them here at home. Affordable health care for every American. A plan to make America stronger at home and respected abroad.

But John Edwards had nothing to share but attacks and excuses. As the perpetrator of four years of failed Senate performace Edwards had a lot to answer for in this debate. But he failed to explain those failures, instead attacking George Bush over and over again.

I want a plan for the future, not attacks and excuses. The vice presidential debate made it clear that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are the right choice.

(end)

---