Skip to comments.
CBS Arranged Meeting (For Burkett) With Lockhart. (Kerry People In This From Start!)
USA Today & Drudge ^
| Kevin Johnson, Dave Moniz and Jim Drinkard
Posted on 09/20/2004 10:31:03 PM PDT by MindBender26
Edited on 09/20/2004 11:17:43 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Title and link only for USA Today.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dnc; hellzapoppin; joelockhart; kerry; napalminthemorning; rathergate; seebsnews; stainedbluememo; terrymcauliffe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 241-248 next last
To: 1stMarylandRegiment
Ahhhhhhhh...but the SEC is going to go after Martha,with a CIVIL suit,for insider trading,once she has served this wee 5 months of jail time. :-)
To: Howlin
Good thing the cat woke me up!
I KNEW they had colluded! How else did they get that tape of Rather into that ad so quickly? Now, if we are lucky, Bob Shrum will get into a huge battle with Lockhart. HA!
To: Miss Marple
This is really amazing, isn't it?
I can hardly wait to see the next names that drop.
From what I have seen on TV (including Mort Zuckerman and Howard Fineman) this is NOT going away and they are NOT going to let CBS "sugar coat" this; they ALL know this reflects on them to.
Wonder how long it's going to take the other reporters at CBS like John Roberts to realize that unless he comes out against Rather he's dead, too.
143
posted on
09/21/2004 12:51:54 AM PDT
by
Howlin
(What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
To: MindBender26
Un-F****ing-believable! I am flabergasted! The brazen, arrogant, audacity of CBS News boggles the mind. I am mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!
Dan Rather et al maliciously tried to damage the name of a good man; a good man who happens to be President of the United States of America. Dan Rather and company tried to destroy a presidency.
Dan Rather and CBS are as un-American as they come.
Everyone needs to write CBS and let them know what they are: vicious, partisan, frauds.
And everyone needs to write CBS sponsors and advertisers and inform them of the consequential boycott.
This is serious.
144
posted on
09/21/2004 1:01:48 AM PDT
by
Presto
(If the Democrats aren't on Al-Qaeda's payroll, they're being gypped.)
To: sully777
Both Cleland and Lockhart have admitted to one phone call each and a very limited conversation with no followup. They are inocculating themselves against the plague coming upon their house. This is just like Christmas!
145
posted on
09/21/2004 1:04:30 AM PDT
by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
To: MindBender26
"WHAT DID RATHER KNOW
AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT?"
To: Travis McGee; nopardons; Lancey Howard
147
posted on
09/21/2004 1:07:35 AM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: claudiustg
Both Cleland and Lockhart have admitted to one phone call each and a very limited conversation with no followup. They are inocculating themselves against the plague coming upon their house. This is just like Christmas!
Does anyone actually believe what they say about what they talked about with Burkett? They are only fessing up because if they don't now, when someone looks into Burkett's phone records they will see Cleland and Lockhart's phone numbers.
To: PhilDragoo
Hehehehehehehehehehehehehe...this is the gift that keeps giving and is NOT going away,no matter how many people attempt to deminish it with lies/denials/obfuscations.The truth will out.
To: nopardons
Hillary Rodham in August 1974 tried to prevent Nixon from having counsel.
Thirty years ago it was her turn to party-party.
But the wheel has turned. . . .
150
posted on
09/21/2004 1:13:56 AM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: Howlin
Have you seen that story in USA Today about an interview with Burkett? The guy is nuttier than a fruitcake. He is going to spill the names of everyone involved in this before it's over.
To: Miss Marple
I've just printed them off to take to bed to read! I may have to take a highlighter with me though.
152
posted on
09/21/2004 1:15:17 AM PDT
by
Howlin
(What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
To: PhilDragoo
Yes,I know that she pulled that one,but it wouldn't fly.
And she'd better worry about US,because we really DO have some power now; I guess the VRWC does exist after all. LOL
To: igoramus987
Getting your name out early for something you can't hide is good. That way the press fondles you then throws you aside as they zero in on the next victim. Looks like the Kerry/DNC folks dribbled old Burkett down the court and slam-dunked him right into the briar patch. Now he's going to start swinging in every direction, but in the mean time there are too many Dims running around that know too much. I know the Kerry campaign cannot manage damage control. They haven't managed anything right so far. The ship will go down, many hands lost. They know it too; the smell of fear is on them.
154
posted on
09/21/2004 1:29:18 AM PDT
by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
To: nutmeg
155
posted on
09/21/2004 1:30:54 AM PDT
by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: Miss Marple
Have you seen that story in USA Today about an interview with Burkett? The guy is nuttier than a fruitcake. He is going to spill the names of everyone involved in this before it's over.
My bet is just like he turned on Bush, he is going to turn on CBS, the DNC and the Kerry campaign.
To: Howlin
From what I have seen on TV (including Mort Zuckerman and Howard Fineman) this is NOT going away and they are NOT going to let CBS "sugar coat" this; they ALL know this reflects on them to. Wonder how long it's going to take the other reporters at CBS like John Roberts to realize that unless he comes out against Rather he's dead, too. Especially since Bill Burkett is a complete lunatic, yet CBS called him an unimpeachable source. It's hard to sugarcoat that!
To: kingu
158
posted on
09/21/2004 2:07:33 AM PDT
by
NautiNurse
(Bonnie, Charley, Frances, Ivan...painting curtains on the boarded windows)
To: Miss Marple
Burkett's own doubts about the authenticity of the memos and his inability to supply evidence to show that Ramirez exists also raise questions about his credibility.Lucy Ramirez = Robin Rather???
159
posted on
09/21/2004 2:15:57 AM PDT
by
NautiNurse
(Bonnie, Charley, Frances, Ivan...painting curtains on the boarded windows)
To: MindBender26
RED ALERT!
BUMP For sharing later...
160
posted on
09/21/2004 2:22:13 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 241-248 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson