Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Max Cleland the Missing Link in the CBS Docudrama? [Nice take]
ChronWatch ^ | September 20, 2004 | Barbara Stock

Posted on 09/20/2004 6:28:41 AM PDT by johnny7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: woodb01

Also- General STAUDT was IGNORED!!!!!
He is still alive and living in Texas!!!!
No one in CBS seems to have contacted him for comments.

Yet General Staudt is explicitly named (and slandered) in one of the memos as pushing Guard officials to "sugar coat" their performance reviews.

Un-be-frickin-lievable "journalism".


21 posted on 09/20/2004 6:50:35 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

I think Cleland is a definite high probability.

CBS must divulge all sources in the chain of custody of the documents.

If they were "decieved" then there is no first amendment protection issue. divulge the decievers.


22 posted on 09/20/2004 6:50:52 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! NOV 2, 2004 is VETERANS DAY! VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
I doubt there was any time logged since last year. She simply had a file that was 4 years old.

Yup! One look at her face and you can see she's no major player... neither is Burkett... they're just the mules.

Cleland to Kerry to Rather... the baseball opposite of Tinker to Evers to Chance.

Who say's politics and baseball have nothing in common!

23 posted on 09/20/2004 6:51:10 AM PDT by johnny7 (“This is no motley of Japs!” -Merrit 'Red Mike' Edson, Guadalcanal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

all over the WWW this morning is the "CBS thinks they were "midlead" .. this is SO MADDENING to read!!...mislead?? Dan Rather himself said "there is No APOLOGY coming and no investigation coming, NOR SHOULD THERE BE"... they are ONLY doing this AFTER A SOLID WEEK of people like us, calling them on it.. if NOT they would have "STUCK" by that pack of lies.....I say they get NO PASS ON THIS.....that RATHER and his PRODUCER BOTH and the HEAD OF CBS should be fired....less than THAT is an INSULT to US and the President of the United States....
dont LET this story go away!!!


24 posted on 09/20/2004 6:51:23 AM PDT by ArmyBratCutie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Maybe Cleland was trying to deliver copies of the "memos" when he showed-up at W's ranch?


25 posted on 09/20/2004 6:51:24 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repairman Jack
If these suggestions are true, that there was collusion, then I'd hazard to say Max doesn't have a leg to stand on.

*groan* :)

26 posted on 09/20/2004 6:51:33 AM PDT by TBarnett34 (The Democrats: 9/10 girlie-men in a 9/11 world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: finnman69



Two thumbs up, Max.


27 posted on 09/20/2004 6:51:36 AM PDT by Repairman Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
If allegations started to fly, the Democratic National Committee would put out the idea that the ingenious and evil Karl Rove was the culprit

A week before McAulliffe started accusing Rove of planting the documents, I posted a thread showing the dems were trying to pin it on the GOP. (The thread was pulled for some reason)

Anyway, the DemocRATS proved to be true to form.

28 posted on 09/20/2004 6:52:08 AM PDT by harrycarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow



Possible. It would sure cut their credibility off above the knees.



29 posted on 09/20/2004 6:53:22 AM PDT by Repairman Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Bill Burkett states he then sent what he had to Max Cleland, and that was the last Burkett heard from anyone involved with the Kerry campaign.

This is the first time I've read that Max Cleland was in the actual chain of custody of the ''documents''. What I've read other places is more ambiguous, something along the lines that Burkett gave ''them'' the information, implying the Kerry campaign organization without any info as to ''who'', specifically, the info was mailed/ faxed to. IF it has been nailed down that the info was sent to Cleland, this is a significant new fact, I would think, although not a real surprising one.

30 posted on 09/20/2004 6:56:20 AM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Much as I'd like to believe it (it would be so delicious), I don't think the Kerry campaign or the DNC is in the loop on this.

After listening to all the stories and thinking about all the personalities involved, here's the way I think it went down: Bill Burkett first provided the memos to Max Cleland who passed them along to the DNC/Kerry Campaign. The Kerry gang discussed the memos, looked them over, argued among themselves whether to use them or not, and ended up sitting on them. In the mean time, CBS producer Mary Mapes is still trying to get some dirt on Bush's ANG career. She gets in touch with Burkett, who by that time is getting impatient that the DNC/Kerry campaign are using the memos and he feels they are running out of time. Burkett decides to take matters into his own hands, and provides CBS with copies of the memos. The rest, as they say, is history.

31 posted on 09/20/2004 6:56:41 AM PDT by TerriHaute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Simplest scenerio: Burkett created and faxed the memos. Barnes and Cleland vouched for them. CBS showed the documents to the WH and held their breath.

Now from the point of view of the WH, the documents are noting thyy've seen before. They are either real or not. If they are real, it is best not to say anything. If they are fake it is best not to say anything.

CBS takes their silence as "proof" that the documents are real. I am pretty certain that the WH played poker on this.


32 posted on 09/20/2004 6:57:01 AM PDT by js1138 (Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

If Cleland is the source, you can expect 0 legal ramifications from this and the story will probably die.
Despite the obvious fact that things were done that were illegal against federal law, you're just not going to see anyone from the Bush Administration go after a handicapped vet, it's just not going to happen.
By making Cleland the conduit, the DNC probably, sad by true, protected the inner workings of this strategy and fiasco.


33 posted on 09/20/2004 6:59:07 AM PDT by WoodstockCat (DNC and John Kerry: Forgers R' Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repairman Jack

So, if Max was confronted with this, do you think he would be stumped for a response?


34 posted on 09/20/2004 7:00:26 AM PDT by N. Theknow (N. Theknow - Proud Member - Vast Right Wing Googling Pajama Monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Repairman Jack

Mad Max would give his right arm to get out of this one.


35 posted on 09/20/2004 7:00:33 AM PDT by Wardawg (Hanoi John Forgery le Kerrie was here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

bump to read more comments later


36 posted on 09/20/2004 7:01:59 AM PDT by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow; Wardawg


LOL. I'm spent.


37 posted on 09/20/2004 7:02:46 AM PDT by Repairman Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Is Max Cleland the Missing Link in the CBS Docudrama? [Nice take]

Well, let's see. The whole thing was pretty clumsy and inept and blew up in their faces. And, as an attack against Bush, it had no legs.
38 posted on 09/20/2004 7:03:58 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TerriHaute

Okay, try this one: Burkett comes up with the .docs, contacts Kerry campaign. Cleland goes to Kerry and says "We got dirt, but it's from Burkett." Kerry says, "Whatever it is, I don't want to know." Cleland takes this as a go-ahead with plausible deniability for JFK and lets it rip.

I know, we're all shotgunning this, but we're probably in the ballpark as a whole.


39 posted on 09/20/2004 7:04:22 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (I voted for Bush... before I voted for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

One more possible link in the chain...Dan Rather's daughter is a Democrat activist in Texas with party connections.


40 posted on 09/20/2004 7:04:32 AM PDT by steve8714
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson