David Van Os (Bill burkett's lawyer) with Senator Max Cleland
Posted on 09/20/2004 6:28:41 AM PDT by johnny7
As most Americans were glued to the television sets on Saturday watching their favorite college team fight it out on the gridiron, a diligent Associated Press reporter filed his daily column and then probably found a television set himself to cheer his favorite team. On college football Saturdays nearly everything stops. This report was picked up by Fox News but only in passing--at least for now. Perhaps not wanting to fall into the same hole as CBS NEWS, Fox is being a little more careful.
What was in this AP report that seems to be slipping under just about everyone’s radar screens? Bill Burkett, the former Guardsman from Texas and the man now being fingered as the source of the forged ''Memogate'' documents, has admitted that after plowing through several layers of ''bureaucratic kids'' he contacted John Kerry’s good friend, the former senator from Georgia, Max Cleland. Burkett told Cleland that he had information that the Kerry campaign could use to ''counter the swift boat ads.'' Mr. Burkett stated he asked Cleland ''if they wanted to counterattack or ride this to ground and outlast it, not spending any money.'' Burkett reported that Cleland told him that they wanted to counterattack. Bill Burkett states he then sent what he had to Max Cleland, and that was the last Burkett heard from anyone involved with the Kerry campaign. The implications of this report are enormous. If these forged documents can be traced from Bill Burkett to John Kerry via Max Cleland, members of the Kerry campaign--if not Kerry himself--could be under criminal investigation for passing forged government documents.
From this point--at least for now--much is speculation, but there are certain facts that are known. The people at the CBS News department stated that they had been working on the Bush Texas Air National Guard story for over four years. In all that time apparently no one had been able to come up any evidence solid enough to take on the air. Then these ''documents'' were dropped into their laps. As any news source would do, CBS has so far refused to reveal its source. One would think that if that ''source'' intentionally passed CBS forged documents, the unwritten rule to protect them could be thrown away. But, as of this writing, CBS officials continue to protect their source. Would CBS go to such lengths to protect a retired and bitter ex-guardsman from Texas?
Many experts have come forward to say that they warned the CBS executives that there were abnormalities within these documents and at the very least required a more detailed study. For some obscure reason, CBS decided to run with the story. Those are the known facts to this date. Were the CBS bosses careless? Were they anxious to get ratings? Were they just anxious to ''get Bush?'' Is it possible that because of a trusted ''source,'' CBS felt that the documents had to be real? More than likely, Bill Burkett was not the direct source. If that had been the case, they would have been much more careful and investigated the source of these documents. The Kerry campaign may well have been the source and because of this, CBS let its guard down and accepted the documents at their face value giving them only cursory checks. The documents were manna from heaven. Finally they had something concrete to nail George Bush from a source CBS felt could be trusted.
Anyone in the Kerry camp could have made a quick trip to Abilene, Texas, to fax the documents to CBS News. If anything went amiss with the plan, the Kerry people could just plead ignorance. If allegations started to fly, the Democratic National Committee would put out the idea that the ingenious and evil Karl Rove was the culprit, out to make the innocent John Kerry look bad. It was just a Republican smear campaign! No matter how serious the situation got, all fingers would point to Bill Burkett, not Kerry. There was no direct contact between Kerry and Burkett so it probably seemed worth the risk to take a shot at President Bush in desperate times. Perhaps there was just one thing John Kerry, Max Cleland, and Terry McAuliffe didn’t count on or just didn’t know about--Bill Burkett has a small history of being a tad unstable. Mr. Burkett has a long history of speaking his mind. He also has a long history of disliking the Bush family. Did he feel slighted when he received not so much as a ''thank you'' from the Kerry camp for all his hard work? What would possess him to speak to a reporter and tell him of the contact with Max Cleland? Max Cleland is a direct line to John Kerry. Was granting an interview to a reporter his revenge for being slighted?
Did Burkett realize that he was going from hero to goat? Did he sense he was going to be thrown to the wolves? If this turns out to be the case, it will be a very costly slight for the Kerry campaign as this report is picked up by the other major networks who are circling CBS like vultures over a dead body. The news business is very competitive and only the strong survive. It is the unwritten law among newsmen that you make sure your information is as accurate as possible before you go public, but CBS broke this rule. The oldest network among them broke the cardinal rule and in doing so, embarrassed them all. No mercy will be shown and no quarter given. A story is a story and CBS is the story. If it can be shown that CBS received these forged documents from the Kerry camp, it will be a story with repercussions that will be felt right through to the election. How far will CBS fall before it decides it must try to salvage what’s left of its own integrity? If the Kerry people are the source, to what lengths will CBS go to protect the candidate? If the CBS plan was to affect the outcome of the November election, CBS can claim ''mission accomplished.''
It will be fascinating to hear the denials and excuses as the Kerry people turn on poor Mr. Burkett. He wanted to help John Kerry; he wanted to get even with the Bush family, but now that one phone call to Max Cleland may bring down the entire Democrat Party. For political junkies, does it get any better than this?
About the Writer: Barbara is a registered nurse who enjoys writing about politics and current events.
She has a website at http://www.republicanandproud.com/.
Barbara receives e-mail at dickens502003@yahoo.com.
Fact is, there are a LOT of VERY serious issues that should be pushed HARD about the documets.
1. The widow and son were IGNORED
2. Document experts were IGNORED
3. Hodges was MISLED
4. The old secretary was NOT INTERVIEWED until afterward
5. The opinions of the experts were MISREPRESENTED
6. The swift boat veterans were MALIGNED
7. George Bush's roomate DURING HIS GUARD YEARS, who AGREED TO SPEAK TO THEM WAS TURNED DOWN BECAUSE HE WAS TOO "PRO BUSH"...
And the list goes on. Fact is, this was a HIT PIECE ON BUSH. And just because dnCBS owns up to fake documents does NOT CLEAR THEIR PROPAGANDA / DNC REPORTING!!
If the documents were the ONLY ISSUE in this, without all of the other plainly propaganda driven results, it wouldn't be such an issue.
THE DOCUMENTS ARE JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG! THE ICEBERG IS THE MANIPULATION AND DECEPTION OF THE PUBLIC!!
This is how I see things went down:
Burkett created Memo ======> Provided to Cleland ======>
OK'd from Kerry ======> Cleland gave Memo to Texas DNC =====>
Texas DNC faxed to CBS News
Max, on principle, shouldn't you resign from your 6-figure-salary government job that W appointed you to?
Motive and opportunity
Max the malingerer must take a bath and come clean, but will not.
Max Cleland, at this very moment, may be wishing the medics weren't so efficient those many years ago, and Bill Burkett most certainly is pining away for the good old days, when he was safe and secure in a rubber room.
CBS worked 4 years on the National Guard story?
How many years did they work on the Juanita Broaddrick story?
If these suggestions are true, that there was collusion, then I'd hazard to say Max doesn't have a leg to stand on.
And softly in the background, "Taps" is being played.
Link or limb?
What are the chances that the Kerry campaign is NOT behind the release? That instead it's the "Clinton '08" campaign who got them to Burkett knowing he would use them?
Burket probably put memo's on a fax broadcast and spammed everyone he could. After that everyone probably reinforced each other wish that these were legitimate docs.
Burkett created Memo ======> Texas DNC hooks Burkett up with contact info leading to to Cleland ======> Burkett Provides Docs to Cleland ======> OK'd from Kerry ======> Cleland gave ok to fax to CBS News....
And the missing link....CBS 'unimpeachable authority' ======> Former Senator Cleland.
That, and protecting Cleland, and by extension the Kerry campaign is why Rather was in Texas, and hooked up with Burkett.
I do know for a fact that Cleland has been working very hard on the military vote for the Kerry campaign. He's been the brains behind their strategy to target military voters in swing states.
Also, wasn't he in Texas quite recently doing a PR stunt outside the gates at Crawford?
I doubt there was any time logged since last year. She simply had a file that was 4 years old. They used this fact to butress the original story.
He seems to have dropped this political grenade on himself.
Up for a beer? :)
Tracing the fake documents, do you think there was a some sort of hand-off between him and Burkett?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.