Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kofi Follies: Annan Moves Leave U.N. Community Perplexed
NewsMax ^ | 9/15/04 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 09/15/2004 6:06:04 PM PDT by wagglebee

In a series of what many call "bizarre" actions, U.N. chief Kofi Annan finds himself the target of sniping from various factions of the diplomatic community.

Late Tuesday, NewsMax's Stewart Stogel learned that the secretary-general, through his director of the Department of Public Information, Shashi Tharoor, moved to block a teleconference by Taiwan President Chen Shui-bian with U.N. journalists, which was to be held in the correspondents club at United Nations headquarters.

The Chen news conference was tied to Taiwan's annual drive to regain U.N. membership, which it lost to Beijing in the early 1970s.

The mainland government has steadfastly maintained that Taipei needs no membership at the United Nations since Taiwan is a province of the People's Republic of China, which already has a permanent seat.

Taiwanese diplomats in NYC, who enjoy full diplomatic status (courtesy of the U.S. State Department), insist that Beijing does not and will not represent the 21 million citizens of the Republic of China (Taiwan).

Hence, an annual standoff.

In the past, Annan and his predecessor, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, buckled under pressure from the Chinese U.N. mission and closed the NYC headquarters to anyone Beijing objects to.

Whether it be dissidents from Tiananmen Square, the Falun Gong or officials from Taiwan, Beijing always makes sure the U.N. welcome mat is rolled up.

Last year, Taiwan's ambassador in New York was barred at gunpoint from entering U.N. headquarters.

In the mid-1990s, Boutros-Ghali had the U.N. Correspondents Club bolted shut and then posted an armed guard to prevent a Chinese dissident student from addressing reporters.

The film of reporters who photographed the incident was seized by U.N. press spokesman Joe Sills.

Other dissidents, such as those from the Russian republic of Chechnya, as well as the Irish Republican Army, have been allowed to meet with U.N. reporters in their club without any interference.

The Chinese are the sole exception. The U.N., which normally says it "has no control over the club," always makes an exception to placate Beijing.

In a letter to U.N. reporters, Tharoor said that Annan "feels bound" by the interpretation of General Assembly resolution 2758 given to him by the U.N. Office of Legal Affairs, and therefore will not permit the U.N. correspondents to use their club to conduct a video teleconference with President Chen Shui-bian of Taiwan.

In protest, the U.N. correspondents canceled the news conference.

Meanwhile, U.N. reporters are not the only folks "annoyed" with Annan.

In another bizarre decision, the secretary-general has decided to snub Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov when he comes to NYC next week for the annual General Assembly.

Russian diplomatic sources tell NewsMax the U.N. chief refuses to attend the opening of a photo exhibition celebrating 100 years of Itar-Tass (the Russian news agency).

"We are celebrating 100 years of Tass with an exhibition and reception at U.N. headquarters," explained one Russian source.

"The secretary-general was invited to attend the opening, to be hosted by our foreign minister Sergey Lavrov. He [Annan] declined ... twice!"

According to Russian sources, Annan's staff claimed he had "scheduling conflicts."

Before becoming foreign minister earlier this year, Lavrov was Moscow's U.N. ambassador for a decade and a senior member of the NYC diplomatic corps.

Many at Russia's U.N. mission were infuriated by the Annan move.

"We still have time to 'convince' him to attend," smiled one Russian diplomat. "It is in his best interest to attend," he added.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: chechnya; china; kofiannan; taiwan; un
I firmly believe that the UN is well beyond the point of ever being an effective international body. If the US were to quit the UN, I think a number of other nations would soon follow. We can then start an effective organization to pursue the goals that the UN was designed to pursue but never did.
1 posted on 09/15/2004 6:06:04 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I firmly believe that the UN is well beyond the point of ever being an effective international body. If the US were to quit the UN, I think a number of other nations would soon follow. We can then start an effective organization to pursue the goals that the UN was designed to pursue but never did.

I agree. The US could fill the role of the UN, though not as publicly.
2 posted on 09/15/2004 6:08:17 PM PDT by Jaysun (The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Annan is setting the table for Billy Jeff to be crowned "King of the World."


3 posted on 09/15/2004 6:10:39 PM PDT by mrobison (We are the music makers and we are the dreamers of dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This is outrageous! Why do we allow such contemptible bungholios to operate their socialist apparatus within the USA?


4 posted on 09/15/2004 6:15:21 PM PDT by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I firmly believe that the UN is well beyond the point of ever being an effective international body. If the US were to quit the UN, I think a number of other nations would soon follow. We can then start an effective organization to pursue the goals that the UN was designed to pursue but never did.

I guess that since the 'oil for food' scam is over, good ol' Kofi has to point his attention to 'other areas of profit'????? What a joke?????

5 posted on 09/15/2004 6:15:38 PM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Please put Saddam back in power so I can start getting my illeagal oil for food money once again. The U.N. slush fund is running low.

6 posted on 09/15/2004 6:15:47 PM PDT by Fire137 (If this is not a war I don't know what one is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
"In a series of what many call 'bizarre' actions, U.N. chief Kofi Annan finds himself the target of sniping from various factions of the diplomatic community.

"Bizarre Actions"??

Heck, Annan should be investigated thoroughly for 1001 reasons then hung before he high-tails it to Switzerland to fornicate with his "secret" bank account stash.

7 posted on 09/15/2004 6:16:22 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Agreed.... This only goes to prove that the UN is an elitist social club for arrogant diplomats that want to enjoy the American lifestyle with out being a Citizen!

GET THE UN OUT OF THE US NOW!
8 posted on 09/15/2004 6:16:40 PM PDT by Americanwolf ("Be vwey vwey quite! I am hunting DU Twolls! ---Elmer Fuwd Free Republic member and cartoon icon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yooper
Why do we allow such contemptible bungholios to operate their socialist apparatus within the USA?

Plus it's sitting on prime real estate that's ripe for redevelopment!

9 posted on 09/15/2004 6:20:31 PM PDT by wagglebee (Benedict Arnold was for American independence before he was against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
United Nations Socialists

United Nazis

10 posted on 09/15/2004 6:24:08 PM PDT by woodb01 (Take out the 'dnC'BS "news" trash... Make dnCBS EXTINCT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Valin; Luis Gonzalez; AdmSmith

Kofi, China, Russia, Pong


11 posted on 09/15/2004 6:26:17 PM PDT by nuconvert (Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

While I whole-heartedly support an immediate withdrawl from the UN, I do not believe that other countries would follow suite. If anything, they would simply use our absence to mount attacks against us.


12 posted on 09/15/2004 8:06:51 PM PDT by Dr. Marten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The UN should have one purpose and thats to provide a meeting space for countries to hash out disagreements and make sure there is enough refreshments for the lunch time break.


13 posted on 09/15/2004 8:17:24 PM PDT by Mulch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
The problem with old koffee is that he is through and through a communist. Been there and done that. It it a huge suprise that he would go to the side of the Communist Chinese. Remember them the fellows who handle protesters by running them over by the thousands with tanks and automatic weapons.
14 posted on 09/15/2004 11:04:19 PM PDT by tygershark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
The problem with old koffee is that he is through and through a communist. Been there and done that. It it a huge suprise that he would go to the side of the Communist Chinese. Remember them the fellows who handle protesters by running them over by the thousands with tanks and automatic weapons.
15 posted on 09/15/2004 11:10:44 PM PDT by tygershark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson