To: MamaDearest
To: 4thygipper; Donna Lee Nardo; Cindy; JustPiper; Velveeta; Godzilla; null and void; ...
Bin Laden's Hustlers-The un-Islamic venues by which Islamic terrorists finance their trade. Frontpagemagazine ^ | 9-21-04 | Josh Lefkowitz and Erick Stakelbeck
Posted on 09/21/2004 10:39:40 AM EDT by SJackson
Link to FR Post
1,233 posted on
09/21/2004 7:48:35 AM PDT by
all4one
("..a politician is to be judged by the animosities he excites among his opponents" Sir W. Churchill)
To: 4thygipper
It's all speculation. They are either going to hit us hard, or they are impotent and using scare tactics (such as beheadings, internet threats and rudimentary tapes) as their primary means of terrifying us. The only two means of communication with them are decimation of their nests or capture. IMHO locals with knowledge of hostages who do not report their location to authorities (coalition troops) are as guilty as the hostage takers. Those "street dancers" need to be considered enemies of the coalition and meet the same fate as the insurgents. Harsh, yes - but as long as we have troops in Iraq, their safety and the stability of the country come first. Those abiding by the law and respectful of coalition troops should not be affected.
To: 4thygipper
Re- 9/27- I've come across that date several times- as a date of concern. I wish I could recall where and why.
To: 4thygipper
"Someone over on the Gertz story thread is concerned about 9/27 b/c it is 1111 days after 9/11. I really think the number thing is far fetched as it is easy to manipulate figures."
===
===
I agree with you.
I said in post no. 1195:
I'm still waiting for someone to be bold enough to come out with this honest headline:
TERRORISTS MAY ATTACK ANYTIME, ANYWHERE
Terrorists Use the Element of Surprise and Won't
Divulge Their Plans
1,286 posted on
09/21/2004 1:34:37 PM PDT by
Cindy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson