Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Edwards wants Bush to address the memos
nashuatelegraph.com ^

Posted on 09/10/2004 10:51:26 AM PDT by vmivol00

Edwards wants Bush to address Guard memos

By KEVIN LANDRIGAN, Telegraph Staff landrigank@telegraph-nh.com

Published: Friday, Sep. 10, 2004

NASHUA - President Bush should have to explain newly released records that reveal his former Texas National Guard superior was asked to “sugar coat” performance records after finding Bush failed standards to be a trained pilot, Sen. John Edwards said Thursday.

“I think they are reasonable and legitimate questions the White House ought to answer,” Edwards said during an interview with The Telegraph.

CBS News released 1972 and 1973 memos Wednesday from Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, who had commanded the 111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron where Bush served.

In one, Killian wrote that higher-ups wanted him to “sugar coat” Bush’s record after he got suspended from flying for failing performance standards and missing a required physical.

Killian died in 1984.

(Excerpt) Read more at nashuatelegraph.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: documentgate; edwards; killian; rathergate; selectricgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: NewMediaFan

I know Edwards is probably busy on the campaign trail, and may not have had time to look at ANY of the news sources which are reporting these documents as fakes, but don't you think one of his advisors should have mentioned it to him.

Do think Carville and the Clintonistas advised Edwards to make this statement to Bush?


21 posted on 09/10/2004 11:00:23 AM PDT by vmivol00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels

"Bush just said he'd like EDWARDS to explain the memos"

Is that true? If so - AWSOME!! I'm SO looking forward to the day after the election, when Kerry marches back to his mansion in shame. And all the angry/hateful "peaceful" people (you know, the ones beating up the cop in NY at the convention) start chewing their livers in outrage. Oh my, that's going to be great. I'm chuckling a little right now just thinking about it.


22 posted on 09/10/2004 11:00:28 AM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

pssst psst....John....here's the updated talking points.
Sorry we were a little tardy in getting to them.

Oh........here's a towel. You have what looks like egg all over your face and crow feathers on your lips.


23 posted on 09/10/2004 11:00:36 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
I know, I know! Over here! Pick me!

John Edwards, Esq. could clear this up right now by channeling LTC Killian.

Enquiring minds want to know!

24 posted on 09/10/2004 11:00:42 AM PDT by yatros from flatwater (Postmodernism, among the many 'isms brought to you by Lucifer, Father of Nuance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
Looks like Edwards is trying to run a campaign based on forged documents.

Also looks a little suspicious that the Kerry campaign had a whole strategy built around the airing of that 60 minutes story, eh?

25 posted on 09/10/2004 11:00:51 AM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

BWWWAAAHHHH HHHAAAA HAAAAA!

Sorry, that was just soooo funny.


26 posted on 09/10/2004 11:01:20 AM PDT by Calpernia ("People never like what they don't understand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington

Once again, no platform, no plan, ZERO.


27 posted on 09/10/2004 11:01:30 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever ("The message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Seems like a successful lawyer like Edwards should know that it is up to the accuser to prove their case, not the other way around.


28 posted on 09/10/2004 11:02:27 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Dan Rather should have to explain the memos, and the source.


29 posted on 09/10/2004 11:02:42 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

I'd like Edwards to comment on whether or not it is true that the closest he got to wearing a uniform for this country was getting kicked out of the girl scouts.


30 posted on 09/10/2004 11:02:44 AM PDT by jwalsh07 (GIVE'M HELL, ZELL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly

So that is what the F stands for in JFK!


31 posted on 09/10/2004 11:03:35 AM PDT by Calpernia ("People never like what they don't understand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
“I think they are reasonable and legitimate questions the White House ought to answer,” Edwards said during an interview with The Telegraph.

Good for him. The deeper they pull the campaign into the issue, the worse the backlash if they can't prove they're legit.

Like it or not, the burden of proof seems to have shifted to CBS and the Kerry campaign. Other than bluster and bravado, I'm bettin' they don't have anything else to back them.

32 posted on 09/10/2004 11:05:03 AM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
Sorry, Silky Pony, you lost this case. Unlike Lurch, Bush won't allow something like this to take him off offense.
33 posted on 09/10/2004 11:05:11 AM PDT by colorado tanker (wanna see my happy hat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington

I agree with you about the dems strategy. I think they had this information before their convention and that is why Kerry thought he could center it on his Vietnam career. To me, that is the only thing that makes sense on why he would do such a stupid thing as that.


34 posted on 09/10/2004 11:05:17 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

Maybe the "Ambulance Chaser" could tell us who forged the documents...hmmmmmmm


35 posted on 09/10/2004 11:05:45 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

This is from the Onion, right? Surely this can't be fore real. Edwards want Bush to explain what's in the phoney memos? ROFL!!


36 posted on 09/10/2004 11:06:02 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yatros from flatwater

Bump!


37 posted on 09/10/2004 11:06:21 AM PDT by Calpernia ("People never like what they don't understand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: laredo44

The Loch Ness monster is a good guy, dont worry, your safe..................


38 posted on 09/10/2004 11:07:15 AM PDT by lillybet (.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
President Bush should have to explain newly released records that reveal his former Texas National Guard superior was asked to “sugar coat” performance records after finding Bush failed standards to be a trained pilot, Sen. John Edwards said Thursday

Has Sissy-Boy Edwards ever been in any branch of the Armed Forces?

One other note to Sissy-Boy: People in Hell want ice-water, but they don't often get it!

39 posted on 09/10/2004 11:07:27 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (The Swiftboat Vets - Patriotic Americans STILL serving their country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00
“I think they are reasonable and legitimate questions the White House ought to answer,” Edwards said during an interview with The Telegraph.

Why?

Terry McAuliff has as much as admitted that they are phony.

Edwards better watch out! It's dangerous for a democrat to step out of line with the Clintonistas!

40 posted on 09/10/2004 11:08:02 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson