Posted on 09/09/2004 2:09:48 PM PDT by ctdonath2
Proof the CBS document BushGuardaugust1.pdf is a FAKE:
Original text, slightly adjusted for rectangular fit:
Same text, screen capture of document written in MS Word 2002 with no effort to match original aside from document width:
Overlapping images, with original as B/W negative:
Aside from slight warping presumably due to distortion introduced by a low-quality photocopier, the two texts line up exactly. The "30+ year old proof" against Bush is a fraud.
The overlay example on this thread defies randomness.
Probability pretty much demands that this letter is a fake.
I like the way you think.
Maybe it evolved. Or maybe it is the Piltdown font.
Two possibilities:
1. The "original" has a gradual variation of width, as not all matches up exactly everywhere. This is likely due to a series of faxing/photocopying operations, where analog optical errors were introduced.
2. The font rendering software may be slightly different between the systems that I used and the forger used, causing a slightly different spacing/kerning in certain character combinations.
Don't miss the forest for the trees.
Maybe Peter and George are looking forward to Hillary in 2008, an unlikely development if Kerry wins this one.
...I believe the FBI is also capable of determining when, where and by whom a paper was made and how old that particular sheet of paper is, which businesses and government agencies ordered/used that type of paper, etc. I also believe they have vast resources permitting them to identify the properties of inks used in things like pens... and typewriter ribbons.
piltdown
:>)
CBS is standing by it. They will force it to be absolutely proven that it is a forgery.
Two possibilities:
1. The "original" has a gradual variation of width, as not all matches up exactly everywhere. This is likely due to a series of faxing/photocopying operations, where analog optical errors were introduced.
2. The font rendering software may be slightly different between the systems that I used and the forger used, causing a slightly different spacing/kerning in certain character combinations.
Don't miss the forest for the trees.
I'm aware it may have been around a while. The problem I show above is that I mimicked the "original" in seconds - right down to all horizontal and vertical spacing, kerning, line breaks, etc.
Nope. Just some schmoe with a computer, a website, and "let me try that" curiosity.
31: LOL!
The slient majority of the '70's and '80's is no more, we are meeting in places like this and are pushing back the tides of socialism.... I am so proud of our freepers! Warriors for Truth!
Say it loud, say it proud!
Let's roll! :-)
Now is the time for Dan to go drink the Kool-Aid of his party.
B, they will not get an original, just this copy of a copy of a copy from what I see.
They can only go by the typewriters of that time and maybe office inventory lists of what they had.
In addition, having a retired man still writing official documents for the government a year after he was gone from there is absolute proof of fraud right there IMO!
As far as how far they can go, if they wanted to say there were carbon paper copies and other copies, all they have to do to reproduce that is to again use word, plus ONE other step.
They would then use a pin printer to do the memos and make the carbons.
They could date the carbons if they exist though!!!!
When CBS aired the allegations, they said it was all "thoroughly investigated" and that their "experts" had assured them of the docs authenticity.
CBS spokeswoman has also said that the "experts" were actually "witnesses" (whatever that means, the salient point being that they did not, in fact, have the "experts" they initially claimed to have).
CBS has also contradicted their original claim of "thoroughly investigating" by saying they had "suspicions" about the docs before airing. People who "thoroughly investigate" have presumably laid those suspicions to rest, so it looks like they didn't "thoroughly investigate" a damn thing.
CBS said they "stand by the story," and now they've changed that to "looking into any possible error." Huh?
CBS executives are huddling into the night to deal with this crisis. People who have "thoroughly investigated," called in "experts," and "are standing by their story," do not do that. Only liars who have gotten found out do that.
Computer geek, I agree.
PO Box for the Guard unit Here [NOTE: this source my be questionable!!]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.