Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYCVirago
The reason to think that these documents were written (or forged, it remains to be established) on a typewriter using a ribbon. Work from a computer printer would not show a difference in weight or heaviness of different letters, which these documents do.

John / Billyhbob

123 posted on 09/08/2004 10:23:25 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob
"The reason to think that these documents were written (or forged, it remains to be established) on a typewriter using a ribbon. Work from a computer printer would not show a difference in weight or heaviness of different letters, which these documents do."

One of the posters earlier in this thread made a pretty convincing case that the size difference of the same "A" would indicate a cut n paste graphical job, using a digital photo of a real document as a starter (which would explain why there aren't obvious corrections on the forgeries that were commonplace on old, typewritten real documents).

3 Full Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

132 posted on 09/08/2004 10:27:14 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
The reason to think that these documents were written (or forged, it remains to be established) on a typewriter using a ribbon. Work from a computer printer would not show a difference in weight or heaviness of different letters, which these documents do.

Actually, dot-matrix and daisy wheel printers can have variations in character weights given that each letter is manually smashed onto the page through an ink and hammer method, just as a typewriter does.

279 posted on 09/09/2004 1:31:47 AM PDT by RatherBiased.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
The reason to think that these documents were written (or forged, it remains to be established) on a typewriter using a ribbon.

I don't have any clear recollection of IBMs from the early 70s, but I do remember that the high end typewriters used by executives had mylar ribbons that produced a page that looked printed. I'm pretty sure, based on intuition, that any typewriter capable of using a proportional font would have used such a ribbon.

The first document appears to have been scanned from the original rather than from a copy, because you can see through the magic marker and read the text that is supposed to have been blocked.

413 posted on 09/09/2004 9:12:11 AM PDT by js1138 (Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson