1 posted on
09/06/2004 1:33:13 AM PDT by
kattracks
To: kattracks
I get a real kick out of the media trying to decide who the Republicans should run in 08. Major barf alert. Let's get through 2004 election season, rest up for a couple of years and then confront this issue. Course perhaps what they are trying to say is this election is over. On that count, I agree.
2 posted on
09/06/2004 1:42:44 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
To: kattracks
One thing's for sure: There will be no shortage of attractive candidates for our side in '08. It'll be tough to choose. I'll feel like a kid in a candy store.
3 posted on
09/06/2004 1:42:47 AM PDT by
WestVirginiaRebel
("John Kerry sees two Americas. It's mutual. America sees two John Kerrys.")
To: kattracks
May as well vote for Hillary, she's pro-choice too.
4 posted on
09/06/2004 1:47:04 AM PDT by
garylmoore
(Repeat: They made a mistake, they didn't count of George W. Bush.)
To: kattracks
This is stupid, really. He can guess four years out who'll be the #1 contender in the next Republican Primary? I remember in 1996, after Liddy Dole spoke at the convention, how everyone was certain she'd be the candidate come the year 2000. Yet when the time came, she was just one of the lower echelon candidates, not even breaking the Top 3. And NOBODY saw George W. Bush coming.
Rudy looks good, now, but that won't last for four years. Just like it didn't last for Liddy Dole, despite her exceptional performance in the 1996 Primary. If he runs he probably WILL be one of the top contenders, but coming out of the gates I don't think he'll be #1.
5 posted on
09/06/2004 1:49:09 AM PDT by
Green Knight
(Looking forward to seeing Jeb stepping over Hillary's rotting political corpse in 2008.)
To: kattracks
If Rudy runs against Hildabeast Clinton, the 2008 campaign will be dubbed, "Rudy & The Beast!"
6 posted on
09/06/2004 1:50:07 AM PDT by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: kattracks
If Rudy just changed his position on abortion, I think he would have the nomination 100%.
To: kattracks
"A new Newsweek poll showed 50% of registered voters want Giuliani to run for President in 2008."
Yes, I'm sure Newsweek would like that. So would Satan.
Giuliani is pro-abortion and against the Marriage Amendment.
Few people know that, yet.
The piece above is a division piece against our Republican effort. Only the northeastern and west coast states could contain many voters who would enjoy the thought of a Giuliani-Clinton monopoly on the 2008 Election.
11 posted on
09/06/2004 3:16:31 AM PDT by
familyop
(Essayons)
To: kattracks
The guy is also a gun control advocate. Be careful what you wish for.
To: kattracks
Ooooh, a baby killer on the GOP ticket. I'm so excited.
14 posted on
09/06/2004 3:33:35 AM PDT by
Sloth
(John Kerry: Frank Burns with Charles Winchester's pedigree.)
To: kattracks
In the north east, no one can win unless they are socialist light. Rudy is for gun control, for murder of unborn children and for homosexual demands.
Rudy on the Rrepublican ticket for President would be the best thing that could happen for demoncraps.
16 posted on
09/06/2004 4:57:28 AM PDT by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(GEORGE WASHINGTON is nothing like HO CHI MINH as stated by Kerry.)
To: kattracks
That places Giuliani ahead of Arizona Sen. John McCain's 48%, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's 22% - and light-years ahead of Gov. Pataki's 15%.If these are our only choices then the Constitution Party candidate will get 33% of the vote.
18 posted on
09/06/2004 5:44:36 AM PDT by
ChuckK
To: kattracks
No way I vote for a pro-abort, pro-homo candidate.
I'm not even sure I will be able to vote for George "No Spending Bill Left Behind" Bush this November.
19 posted on
09/06/2004 6:12:05 AM PDT by
Charles Henrickson
(Constitutional and moral conservative)
To: kattracks
The only Northerner to have any chance at the nomination spoke last week. It was not Rudy, but Mitt Romney.
Romney is a social and fiscal conservative, who won in Massachussetts. If he can work on his speeches and delivery, he will at least be a VP choice.
22 posted on
09/06/2004 6:05:17 PM PDT by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: kattracks
If these truly were the choices (and of course they aren't), the GOP would be in its death throes...doomed to the same fate as the Whigs.
Obviously the writer knows nary a thing about the Republican nominating electorate.
27 posted on
09/06/2004 6:57:03 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(The Butchers of Beslan will burn in hell for eternity.)
To: kattracks
Mayor Rudy has to look to his Right to see Thurgood Marshall.
To: kattracks
I thought Rudy did OK, a little bland in spots.
Zell MIller gave the knockout speech of the convention. Maybe he can run in 2008?
To: kattracks
He might make VP but you have to be pro-life and be faithful to your spouse to make it to the front of the
line. Sorry liberal press but 65% of the Republicans is not enough.
To: kattracks
PLEASE stop posting this train wreck in the making!
Guiliani the gun grabber can kiss my "SHAVING CREAM, NICE AND CLEAN".
I will make a public promise, right now, that i will NEVER vote for that "SHAVING CREAM, NICE AND CLEAN" no matter WHO is running against him!
A vote for that "SHAVING CREAM, NICE AND CLEAN" RINO would be no different than a vote for Hitlery of Chucky Scheemer!
Who are all these shallow fair weather "republicans" who are falling for this "SHAVING CREAM, NICE AND CLEAN"?
*"SHAVING CREAM, NICE AND CLEAN", substituted for the plain language I would prefer, but which is not PG rated and would probably get me banned ;-)
50 posted on
09/08/2004 12:22:19 AM PDT by
Richard-SIA
("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
To: kattracks
Speech vaults Rudy to front of '08 field
55 posted on
09/08/2004 1:04:09 AM PDT by
Rastus
(Forget it, Moby! I'm voting for Bush!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson