[E. Pluribus Unum]

I thought 527's couldn't play ads after Sept 2?

If that's true, not only is McKeating/Feingold unconstitutional, it is criminal.

Political speech is the precise speech the Founding Fathers were protecting when they wrote the First Amendment.

They weren't protecting pornography.

[Congressman Billybob]

I agree with you that McCain/Feingold is both unconstitutional and criminal. That's why I intent to violate that law deliberately, and tell the FEC to "Come and get me," just prior to the 2 November election.

Click the second link below, if you want to take part in this. (This will be my neck on the chopping block. No one else will be at personal risk -- just me.)

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Carville, Davis, and Other Pests -- 'Those We Don't Speak of' "

If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.

[maryz]

Political speech is the precise speech the Founding Fathers were protecting when they wrote the First Amendment.

Scalia's point in his dissent.

[Nov3]

If that's true, not only is McKeating/Feingold unconstitutional, it is criminal.

Where have you been? Did you not know what CFR was? I certainly hope you didn't think it was anything but a way to allow the networks to control the election!

[Tall_Texan]

Political speech is the precise speech the Founding Fathers were protecting when they wrote the First Amendment. They weren't protecting pornography.

Imagine if they had a 60-day moratorium on pornography before an election. Somehow, I bet the Supreme Court would have found THAT unconstitutional...