Skip to comments.
XM-8 Is Gun of the Future
Fox News ^
| August 9, 2004
| Fox News Staff
Posted on 08/09/2004 9:25:13 PM PDT by Stoat
Edited on 08/09/2004 9:30:46 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
NEW YORK U.S. soldiers have been waiting for a long time for weapons to replace current ones that rely on Vietnam-era technology. And the new weapons are right around the corner.
TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; bang; banglist; gun; guns; soldiers; weapons; xm8
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: VaBthang4
41
posted on
08/10/2004 12:07:33 AM PDT
by
The KG9 Kid
(Semper Fi)
To: All
42
posted on
08/10/2004 12:25:48 AM PDT
by
Vigilant1
(The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.)
To: Stoat
But did sKerry actually vote for it before he voted against it?
To: Unknowing
I dont know the specs but appearance wise it looks to be belt fed and odds are...it's lighter than the Black B&^ch.
44
posted on
08/10/2004 12:29:16 AM PDT
by
VaBthang4
("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
To: VaBthang4
"I dont know the specs but appearance wise it looks to be belt fed and odds are...it's lighter than the Black B&^ch." In the Fox News video clip, they said it was "20% lighter", presumably comparing it to the M-16 in standard 20" barrel config.
45
posted on
08/10/2004 12:33:48 AM PDT
by
Vigilant1
(The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.)
To: Vigilant1
By 'rate selector', I assume you mean the 3-round burst setting that is found on the most recent versions of the M-16/M-4. I hope they do not unnecessarily increase the complexity of the weapon with such a device. That is a hardware solution to a training problem. Troops should be taught proper fire discipline and trigger control, and then no burst setting is needed
Aside from dependability and stopping power,( including dealing with enemy body armor) your comments are what I believe are most important. The M16 does not have full auto and that puts our men at a disadvantage. Fire discipline, as you say is a training matter. If you don't have it, you'll just pull that little 3 round burst 6 or 7 times, with your eyes closed, shooting around a corner and then run.
I like that 100 rd mag. Many a time, in close combat, suppresive fire can keep the enemy down while you get around em or haul a$$. Can't suppress with 3 round bursts. Especially when the enemy has discipline and they have full auto on every weapon in their squad.
Semper Fi
To: TomasUSMC
If only we could get the Army to remember what the Marine have never forgotten. *Sigh!*
47
posted on
08/10/2004 1:15:59 AM PDT
by
Vigilant1
(The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.)
To: TomasUSMC
48
posted on
08/10/2004 1:16:52 AM PDT
by
Vigilant1
(The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.)
To: TERMINATTOR
Great minds think alike. That's the first thing that popped into me (so called) mind.
49
posted on
08/10/2004 6:13:08 AM PDT
by
Valin
(John Kerry: Dumber than Gore, more exciting than Mondale)
To: VaBthang4; All
50
posted on
08/10/2004 4:06:08 PM PDT
by
murdocj
(Murdoc Online - Everyone is entitled to my opinion (http://www.murdoconline.net))
To: TomasUSMC
Aside from dependability and stopping power,( including dealing with enemy body armor) your comments are what I believe are most important. The M16 does not have full auto and that puts our men at a disadvantage. Fire discipline, as you say is a training matter. If you don't have it, you'll just pull that little 3 round burst 6 or 7 times, with your eyes closed, shooting around a corner and then run. What sort of indication, if any, do the new rifles have to show how much ammo remains? I would think that some sort of indicator that was clearly visible to the shooter (not on the side as in Aliens!) would be very useful.
51
posted on
08/10/2004 6:18:53 PM PDT
by
supercat
(If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
To: supercat
I believe the 30 rd mag is see thru. The 100 mag, I don't know. Might have to make some rounds near the end or like every 30 rounds, tracers, if you want to keep track real well.
To: Vigilant1
XM-307 - Cool!
If Kerry had one of those on his SLOW (Stupid Liberal Opposing War) boat, he might have killed two cows!
53
posted on
08/10/2004 6:35:03 PM PDT
by
reg45
To: murdocj
Hello.
I checked your site out last night. Did a google for the XM8 and one of the links took me to you.
54
posted on
08/10/2004 8:56:58 PM PDT
by
VaBthang4
("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
To: Vigilant1
I was talking about the .50.
55
posted on
08/10/2004 8:58:34 PM PDT
by
VaBthang4
("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
To: TomasUSMC
I believe the 30 rd mag is see thru. I would think something that would be visible or perceptible to a shooter with a shouldered weapon would be desirable if it could be made reliable. For example, it should be fairly straightforward to include a counter which would be zeroed when the magazine was removed and would increment every time the action closed with a magazine installed. Even if the counter were electronic and had batteries that could go dead, a battery failure would not interfere with use of the weapon--just make it less convenient to determine how much ammo remained.
56
posted on
08/10/2004 10:13:04 PM PDT
by
supercat
(If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
To: supercat
The 30 round standard mag is semi-transparent. There has been talk of an electronic counter in the fancy sight, but as far as I know it hasn't gone pat the "talk" stage.
Pic of broken-down XM8 (with translucent mag clearly visible) at
http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/001107.html.
I agree that seeing the ammo count without taking your eye off the bad guys would be a big plus.
57
posted on
08/12/2004 12:53:08 PM PDT
by
murdocj
(Murdoc Online - Everyone is entitled to my opinion (http://www.murdoconline.net))
To: dbandit
Re: "All that's going to make the first civilian versions very expensive. That sucks."
One day you'll probably be able to get all you want free for the taking off the blue helmet goons that come to confiscate your deer rifle.
58
posted on
08/12/2004 3:43:31 PM PDT
by
LibTeeth
To: All
59
posted on
08/12/2004 3:43:34 PM PDT
by
Vigilant1
(The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.)
To: LibTeeth
"One day you'll probably be able to get all you want free for the taking off the blue helmet goons that come to confiscate your deer rifle."
That, my two acres and my shovel...hmm, wouldn't be as expensive as I originally thought.
60
posted on
08/12/2004 11:53:07 PM PDT
by
dbandit
(All errors are mine. Maybe I meant it that way.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson