Who among you my fellow Freepers have studied up on this? Is she just a grassy knoller or does she have a solid case?
David Schippers says that what she has can stand up in court.
She has documents, witnesses, positive identifications.
"Who among you my fellow Freepers have studied up on this? Is she just a grassy knoller or does she have a solid case?"
I think I saw her a couple of years back on O'Reilly. She has some compelling bits and pieces, but I came away thinking she hadn't produced anything that proves her theory in its entirety, only cooraborative "facts" are cooroborating minor stuff.
I do have a very hard time accepting McVeigh fell on his own sword, so to speak, to protect some shadowy terrorist organization. He was a nutcase, to be sure....but the "profile" doesn't support the notion. Neither does the testimony, and interviews, of those that knew him well.
She has an excellent case! I've heard her several times on the local Michael Smerconish radio show (Philly). Once, I got home in time to catch my very cynical husband and turned up the radio so he would have to hear. Even he was convinced of her credibility!
Her case is so solid it shocked me. I own the book and can't recommend the book highly enough.
The only problem with the book - it will make you very angry at the government for failing to investigate this matter properly. And not just the Clinton administration. Congress did NOT do their job at all when the OKC bombing was brought back up for investigation.
James Woolsey, former CIA Director, said the world would owe Davis a debt of gratitude when the truth was fully known. Several high ranking FBI agents and directors of terrorism offices said the same thing.
The book, after the first chapter, is fascinating. I read it in an afternoon and couldn't put it down.
She has a solid case IMO.
I just finished the book ... let's say her case is a lot tighter than Fat Boy Moore's ... certainly, there are dots to connect, but those dots aren't too far apart ... a lot of people with no axe to grind would have to be mistaken or lying in order for Davis' thesis to be false.
This thing has stunk like a carp in the glovebox since day one.
Here's another book I've got to get....... With all these books, I'm gonna run out of money.
Jayna's chances of being a 'grassy knoller' are about the same as the chances of John Kerry not mentioning his Vietnam veteran status -- Zilch.
Of all those who have published research on irregularities surrounding the OKC bombing case, Jayna Davis, IMHO, is the most persistent and consistently accurate investigator I have encountered.
Since I include myself in that group, (OKC investigators) you can take the above assessment to be an expression on my part of the highest confidence in her work and motivation.
Jayna is certainly no "grassy knoller".
There be many. She's not a grassy-knoller any more than Charles Key is.