To: Modernman
There's no such thing as "de-evolution."Oh...?
You have this on some authority???
I seem recall that ALL of the fishy stuff that was BEFORE mammals seems to have devolved away....
(t least that's what my MIRROR tells me...)
[Well, in the winter, my HANDS do become a bit scaly...]
97 posted on
07/03/2004 4:46:32 PM PDT by
Elsie
(There is nothing you can't achieve if you are willing to give other people the credit...)
To: Elsie
You have this on some authority???
How about the fact that there's no defined process for "biological devolution" or "biological de-evolution"?
Or are you going to insist that you're right unless we can absolutely prove that every biologist out there disagrees with you?
99 posted on
07/03/2004 5:51:20 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://tinyurl.com/3xj9m)
To: Elsie
I seem recall that ALL of the fishy stuff that was BEFORE mammals seems to have devolved away If by "de-evolved", you mean that certain traits that our ancestor species had have been replaced with other traits, then I guess you're right.
120 posted on
07/04/2004 11:31:44 AM PDT by
Modernman
("I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members" -Groucho Marx)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson