Posted on 06/28/2004 7:03:25 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou
Bush's Fault !!
Maybe the black hole asserted itself in time for the Arkansas Gay Pride Parade? Hmm? We know about black holes and gays...
It does, but accelerating charges emit radiation.
Everything we see is indeed from around the black hole.
But there actually is a tiny amount coming FROM the Black Hole, too little to perceive and swamped by all the radiation from around the Black Hole.
It's called "Hawking Radiation" and it's why Stephen Hawking became a big deal. He figured out it had to exist, computationally, based on quantum mechanics.
Madonna??
Article excerpt:
The force of gravity is effectively zero when compared to the electric force. If you allow for the electrical structure of matter, the almost 2,000 fold difference in mass of the electron and proton will ensure that in a strong gravitational field charge separation will operate to prevent compression. Charge separation prevents the collapse of stars. Exotic theoretical objects like neutron stars and black holes are impossible.
Full Article:
We have free will; with out choice we are just an advanced version of sim city with cheat codes – boring.
1Cr 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
Kook Science Alert.....
Just think. All this stuff just happened willy-nilly, randomly. No nothing. Yes sir, just kinda, sorta fell into place and everything from here to eternity obeys the same rules all by accident.
Thanks for the ping.
In related news:
A Hungry Michael Moore Eats Himself, Achieves Infinite Density
Are you a fan of Dorothy Dunnet?
It doesn't. This is newspaper sloppiness. It's stuff falling in that emits radiation.
.
.
That picture is consistent with predictions of the Plasma Universe cosmologists. Makes more sense than the Black Hole BS (Belief System).
If dark energy were visible, what color would it be?
The article discusses determining the mass, not "weight" of the black hole. Mass is one of only three physical characteristics a black hole can possess.
I read his book A Brief History of Time but could never understand that; to me it implies the material must be traveling faster than the speed of light. Hawking explains it, in part by saying
So in empty space the field cannot be fixed at exactly zero, because then it would have both a precipice value (zero) and a precise rate of change (also zero). There must be a certain minimum amount of uncertainty, or quantum function, in the value of the fields.
A Brief History of Time Page105
The math to understand Heisenburg – who is clearly implied in this statement – is way beyond me (that is why I am a production manager and not a cosmologist). If you could explain how material leaves a black hole (to me that implies crossing the event horizon in the wrong direction –I realize I am not thinking ‘quantumly’) without travailing faster than light, and do it with out higher mathematics, I would be very interested.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.