Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Corin Stormhands; JenB
It is not unlike the "n-word."

A word that can be used within context, only the "n-word" has a much more limited context of proper use. The "n-word" never had a scientific use.

The term Mongoloid was taught and learned by many of us as as with no knowledge of the derogatory alternative use. JenB is completely wrong in her statement that any who uses the word knows it is offensive. I did not.
62 posted on 06/22/2004 12:58:54 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: CyberCowboy777

Let me correct myself. Anyone who uses it to address a child with Down Syndrome, in front of his family, while refusing to actually look at that child, knows it is offensive. It's possible that it can be used inoffensively. When one uses it in a stupid joke, that person probably knows it is offensive.

People may use it innocently, but I think they'd be glad to learn that it can be construed as offensive so as not to use it again.


63 posted on 06/22/2004 1:00:57 PM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: CyberCowboy777; JenB
The term Mongoloid was taught and learned by many of us as as with no knowledge of the derogatory alternative use. JenB is completely wrong in her statement that any who uses the word knows it is offensive. I did not.

Well, now you know.

I'm sorry, but the original use on this thread was clearly pointing at both meanings of the word.

68 posted on 06/22/2004 1:09:00 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Osama remains "missing" 'cause Michael Moore ate him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson