Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military Bases in Germany
New York Times ^ | June 14, 2004 | Editorial

Posted on 06/14/2004 6:34:32 AM PDT by OESY

The Pentagon is proposing sharp cuts in U.S. forces in Germany, which for more than half a century has been America's biggest military outpost in Europe. It's a bad idea, particularly at a time when the United States is struggling to rebuild its relations with its NATO allies.

Washington is hoping to cut its military presence in Germany — a little more than 70,000 soldiers — roughly in half. Two heavy divisions now based there, and the soldiers' families, would return to the United States. They would be replaced by a much smaller light combat brigade, while other units would be rotated in and out, at considerable cost, for short-term exercises. The Air Force is also thinking of moving some of its F-16 fighter jets from Germany to Turkey, where they would be closer to Middle East trouble spots but subject to restrictions by the host government.

The large American military presence in Germany has long symbolized the understanding at the heart of NATO — Washington's commitment to remain permanently engaged in Europe's security and to integrate its military operations with those of its major European allies. Recent history has only reinforced how important that relationship is to the United States. NATO is the only alliance capable of sharing some of the global military burdens that have now overstretched America's ground forces.

Many Germans, remembering Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's scornful "old Europe" put-downs of their country last year, will see these withdrawals, and the accompanying German job losses, as payback for Berlin's diplomatic opposition to the invasion of Iraq. Washington denies that. But the Pentagon does seem to have a growing preference for stationing troops either at home or on the territories of allies ready to embrace President Bush's notions of unilateral preventive war.

Despite its criticisms of the Iraq war, Germany imposed no restrictions on the use of American bases during that conflict. It continues to deploy thousands of German soldiers to protect those bases, freeing American troops for other uses. Berlin also contributes $1 billion a year to the bases' support. Economically, the plan to bring the soldiers home is a loser.

The German bases have other advantages as well. They are much closer to the Middle East and Central Asia than bases in the United States and are in a safe country with a stable democracy and the modern conveniences that make life easier for troops on long tours overseas. Soldiers stationed there have access to a variety of training exercises and can enjoy down time with their families. The American military hospital at Ramstein Air Base, the largest outside the United States, provides specialized care for battlefield casualties from Iraq and Afghanistan as it did for those from Bosnia, Kosovo and the U.S.S. Cole.

There is nothing sacrosanct about maintaining particular Army divisions in Germany. The role of American military forces there has evolved considerably over the decades — from occupying a defeated enemy to deterring Warsaw Pact aggression to symbolizing Washington's post-cold-war commitment to remain militarily engaged in Europe. Along the way, the size of the American presence has evolved as well. In the nearly 15 years since the Berlin Wall fell, United States force levels in Germany have dropped by roughly 75 percent. Further reductions should not be ruled out. But the Pentagon's current plans are unduly drastic, unfortunately timed and suspiciously motivated.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bases; brac; military; militarybases; nato
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: OESY
Personally, if the NY Times thinks it's a bad idea - that's enough to convince me it's a great one. Once again they leap to the conclusion that it is we who need to improve our relationships with Old Europe. I suggest the onus is on them. They're the ones with limping economies, rampant unemployment and schizophrenia about the E.U.

Allied are countries that stand by you even when it's not in their obvious & immediate interest. They do so to preserve and enhance the long-term relationship. Germany and France have failed the test. They are no longer allies.

We need to reward our allies and penalize those who oppose us. Other countries will understand that and think twice about comparing us to Hitler or abusing an undeserved seat on the UNSC to thwart us.

41 posted on 06/14/2004 9:27:34 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Germany needs an Ambassador that speaks only english and french, not troops especially armored troops.


42 posted on 06/14/2004 9:34:35 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
Last data 9 october 2003

4019 polish troops around the world, mostly Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Bosna, Kosovo and Afghanistan. Pretty good contribution for such young democracy. They were engaged before as well in Israel and all other peace missions.

Now you can write number of German troops.
43 posted on 06/14/2004 9:35:34 AM PDT by Lukasz (Hey don't look for my horrible mistakes, I'm learning English here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert56
Yep, NYT is trying to cover for the German socialists' anti-American behaviour, so they can slap us in the face and not pay the consequences.

We should reward Poland and the other new EU states along with other countries brave enough to stand up to the Islamofascists...

If the NYT is for something, i am immediately suspicious -- if i used to hold the same views they espouse, i'll quickly re-examine my views -- i must have missed something if i end up on the same side as the Slimes...

44 posted on 06/14/2004 9:44:30 AM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lukasz

7,750 men and women mostly in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, but also in Georgia, at the Somali coast line, Ethiopia, Eritrea.

Good job, I´ve met Polish paratroopers two years ago, they were kind and well trained.


45 posted on 06/14/2004 9:53:46 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: STFrancis

ping

Not election related, but interesting.


46 posted on 06/14/2004 10:02:29 AM PDT by longjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

At least you had only good things to say about them.

Some of my comments from my nearly 6 years there aren't quite as nice.

But the closer to the border you got, the nicer they were to us GI's.


47 posted on 06/14/2004 10:04:19 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (Coming to you live from HESCO city...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OESY
The large American military presence in Germany has long symbolized the understanding at the heart of NATO — Washington's commitment to remain permanently engaged in Europe's security and to integrate its military operations with those of its major European allies. Recent history has only reinforced how important that relationship is to the United States. NATO is the only alliance capable of sharing some of the global military burdens that have now overstretched America's ground forces.

NATO was created to "Keep the Russians out and the Germans down". Hence the continued occupation of Germany and the lack of a peace treaty 60 years after the end of WWII. The Bundesrepublik government is an instrument of the four occupying powers, not the actual German government in the sense of a constitutional authority with powers from the nation.

48 posted on 06/14/2004 11:09:30 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

Where were you when you were in Germany?
I was at Merrill Barracks, Nuernberg, and Kelley Barracks, Stuttgart.


49 posted on 06/14/2004 11:11:39 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
The Nery York Slimes left out the fact that when Gore reorganized government during the Clinton Administration, 800,000 military personnel were cut. The NYT was silent then so now during the Bush Administration closing a few bases becomes important to them.
50 posted on 06/14/2004 11:18:14 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY
It is telling that the objections that the NY Times musters against this are (1) political, and (2) economic. The truth is that we are attempting to overcome an overreliance on both of those factors that has existed in the past with regard to military deployment, and it isn't an easy thing to do. Many of those bases were placed where they were (as they have been in the United States as well) for reasons other than military utility.

But these are luxuries we can no longer afford. These redeployments are NOT being done to punish anyone despite the Times' persistent efforts to blame this and everything else on Bush. They have been on the drawing board since the Reagan administration.

51 posted on 06/14/2004 11:27:51 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
such moves will have depressant effect on the morale of military families, absent soldier-family separation as a consequence of deployment

I was a military brat, and aware of the prestige and the Plum posting that Europe was for families.

But it is now a decade since the end of the Cold War, and we have other priorities.

It is the military's mission to respond to those priorities.

Good military families will have good morale. And they will buck up and do their duty whereever their men are posted.

52 posted on 06/14/2004 12:36:16 PM PDT by happygrl (The democrats are trying to pave a road to the white house with the bodies of dead American soldiers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
We should move ALL US troops OUT of Germany. What's the point of keeping them there? The Cold war is over and now the Germans can take care of themselves.
53 posted on 06/14/2004 12:50:27 PM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

Inside every German is a Nazi dying to come out.


54 posted on 06/14/2004 12:52:24 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Baumholder, Gelnhausen, Butzbach, and some NATO sites up north. And those are just places I was stationed, actually got to see a bit more of the country side than that, including Hohenfels, Graf, and a lot of other places along the way.


55 posted on 06/14/2004 12:57:29 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (Coming to you live from HESCO city...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: OESY

The Pentagon is proposing sharp cuts in U.S. forces in Germany

FINALLY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!


56 posted on 06/14/2004 1:01:11 PM PDT by sawmill trash (NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

The large American military presence in Germany has long symbolized the understanding at the heart of NATO —

...the understanding that the USA will bail our butts out if the commies show up coming throught the pass.
What the he!! has NATO done for us ?

Let em cover their own defense expenses and quit bleeding us for it.


57 posted on 06/14/2004 1:03:37 PM PDT by sawmill trash (NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

The Socialists at the New York Times are sure quick to support their fellow Socialists running Germany.


58 posted on 06/16/2004 9:25:03 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
"...got to see a bit more of the country side than that, including Hohenfels, Graf, and a lot of other places along the way."

And don't forget Wildflecken ... the only place in the world where it didn't matter which direction you were walking, it was always uphill.

59 posted on 06/16/2004 9:29:39 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmändø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
I was at Merrill Barracks, Nuernberg....

When were you at Merrill, I was there 79-82 with the 116th Ord. Co. Regards!

60 posted on 02/01/2005 3:14:48 PM PST by Bayou City
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson