Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rather, Brokaw, Journos Preparing to Hit Reagan Warts
NewsMax.com ^ | 6/09/04 | Carl Limbacher and the Newsmax.com staff

Posted on 06/09/2004 7:51:51 AM PDT by kattracks

Journalists who bashed and trashed Ronald Reagan during the 1980s are biting their tongues this week amidst the outpouring of love and affection towards the GOP icon from a grateful nation.

But the cease fire won't last long, judging by the comments of major network new anchors Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw and Peter Jennings yesterday.

Rather told the Philadelphia Inquirer the week-long commemoration of Reagan's life was journalistic overkill and hinted that he was anxious to return to stories he thought were more important, like the Abu Ghraib prison scandal.

"Even though everybody is respectful and wants to pay homage to the president, life does go on," he groused. "There is other news, like the reality of Iraq. It got very short shrift this weekend."

The CBS newsman blamed "herd journalism" for the media's fixation on Reagan.

NBC's Tom Brokaw suggested that the media's current presentation of the Reagan legacy was far too positive, noting, that while he "was a beloved American leader . . . at the same time our journalistic obligation is to put his whole life and his political career in context."

He told the Inquirer that a single day's worth of tribute to Reagan would have been enough. After that, it was time to examine "scandals" like "Iran-contra [and] his failure to recognize early on the AIDS epidemic."

ABC's Peter Jennings concurred, telling the Inquirer, "If we waited for the president to be buried before doing a critical analysis, the world would move on quite a bit."

Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz seemed to agree that the focus on Reagan was too much, noting during an online chat on Tuesday, "Nixon got two or three days of very heavy coverage, but nothing like this weeklong, nonstop extravaganza."

"If you were too young to remember Reagan and just tuned in since Saturday," he contended, "you'd have very little idea that he was a controversial figure with legions of detractors as well as admirers."

Longtime Reagan watcher and Post reporter Lou Cannon said Reagan critics could look forward to new ammunition to use against their nemesis.

In a separate online chat, Cannon said that still-sealed documents on Reagan's presidency will be released in the coming years, noting, "and what is revealed in these documents may again change our opinions."



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: wait4thebacklash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: kattracks

They're angry that the herd is headed one way when they were pointing them elsewhere (Abu Grahib).


21 posted on 06/09/2004 8:13:54 AM PDT by theDentist (John Kerry never saw a TAX he wouldn't HIKE !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"After that, it was time to examine "scandals" like "Iran-contra [and] his failure to recognize early on the AIDS epidemic"

But a week after reporting on a Clinton scandal, it was 'old news' and unworthy of another mention. Again, these three hacks no longer care how partisan they are or appear and their agenda pre-empts ethics, balance and fairness.


22 posted on 06/09/2004 8:14:36 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

Exactly. It's put Republicanism in the spotlight and people might just remember what it stands for and vote for W.


23 posted on 06/09/2004 8:15:32 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I love the anchor who said the "reality of Iraq" is being bumped off the news. The reality, which they will never report as such, is a new government and a unanimous UN vote in support of Bush's policy.


24 posted on 06/09/2004 8:16:28 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The CBS newsman (Rather) blamed "herd journalism" for the media's fixation on Reagan."

And if anyone would know about herd journalism, it would be Dan Blather!

25 posted on 06/09/2004 8:19:15 AM PDT by Redbob (we're going to miss you, Ronnie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Contrast this to the never-ending movies, documentaries, news items, etc. that we see about "Camelot" and "America's Royalty."

All of this from networks that wouldn't give Jaunita Broaddrick the time of day.

26 posted on 06/09/2004 8:20:40 AM PDT by Paul Atreides (Didn't your father tell you that unnecessary excerpting will make you go blind?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
NBC's Tom Brokaw suggested that the media's current presentation of the Reagan legacy was far too positive, noting, that while he "was a beloved American leader . . . at the same time our journalistic obligation is to put his whole life and his political career in context."

No, Tom, your "journalistic obligation" is to tell us who-what-when-where. Keep your opinions on the opinion page.

Got it?

27 posted on 06/09/2004 8:22:05 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
...at the same time our journalistic obligation is to put his whole life and his political career in context...

What sort of "obligation" is soiling the reputation of a figure who is beyond all political activity? To whom are these people obliged: us, Reagan's enemies, or themselves? Speaking the truth is the only journalistic obligation, IMHO, not "providing a balance."

OTOH, it is refreshing to see that these propagandists recognize themselves for what they are. What amazes me as that they can continue to sell it as virtuous.

28 posted on 06/09/2004 8:23:18 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Captain Dan, Peter and Tommy are right. Enough is enough.

I've had enough too.

I hope one day to have the pleasure of pissing on the graves of these three liberal media has-beens. Even Chris Matthews has kept his composure and behaved himself at this time of national mourning.

29 posted on 06/09/2004 8:23:23 AM PDT by Reagan Man (The choice is clear. Reelect BUSH-CHENEY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Ronald Reagan's legacy is bringing down the Berlin Wall, Clintoon's is bringing down the World Trade Towers. And the media slimes know it.


30 posted on 06/09/2004 8:23:53 AM PDT by Lets Roll NOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

While the ratings at ABC,CBS & NBC continue to fall...
These clowns just don't get it...
And if I were Rupert Murdock, I would start a nightly news hour on the FOX commercial channels across America and blow the other three majors right off the charts!
Brit Hume would be my anchor.


31 posted on 06/09/2004 8:24:01 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver
... at the same time our journalistic obligation is to put his whole life and his political career in context."

Just as they did with JFK (the first one)? It took years before the whole truth came out about him. Where was their "obligation" then?

32 posted on 06/09/2004 8:25:09 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
These bastards just can't WAIT to piss on Ronald Reagan's grave, can they?

It is not humanly possible for my opinion of these a-holes to get any lower than it already is. Retched scum.
33 posted on 06/09/2004 8:28:25 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Liberalism is the end result of too many people peeing in the gene pool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Way too much coverage for Reagan. You'd think he was JFK, Jr. or Princess Di or something with all the attention his death is getting. < /sarcasm >

Now I know what AM and FM stand for: A$$hole Media and Fricking Media.

34 posted on 06/09/2004 8:32:15 AM PDT by N. Theknow (John Kerry knows how to screw the rich - both his wives are millionaires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I'm all for opening up history.

Let's start with the history that Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather, the chief Marxist propagandists of CBS, are the architects who installed the dictator Pol Pot who set out to create a "worker's rural paradise" by butchering 1 million Cambodians.


35 posted on 06/09/2004 8:33:17 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Gen. Custer wore an Arrowsmith shirt to his last property owner convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

AAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHH!


36 posted on 06/09/2004 8:34:00 AM PDT by Ciexyz ("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Yet, JFK jr and Princess Di got as much air time & I don't remember any of the Elitest Media Slime making a squeak about too much coverage.

Wait till it's Carter or Clintoon, they'll be canonized by these idiots!!!!

God Bless the Reagan family & God Bless the United States of America!!!


37 posted on 06/09/2004 8:34:31 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (Now... There you go again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
ABC's Peter Jennings concurred, telling the Inquirer, "If we waited for the president to be buried before doing a critical analysis, the world would move on quite a bit."

I hate to break it to you, Peeeetah, but other events happened in the world between the dates of September 11 - 17, 2001 as well. You didn't care about not covering those events then.

38 posted on 06/09/2004 8:36:21 AM PDT by Dont Mention the War
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The CBS newsman blamed "herd journalism" for the media's fixation on Reagan.

I see. When Republicans are being trashed, it's honest journalism. When a Republican is being honored, it's herd journalism. Thanks for clearing that up, Mr. Blather.

The vultures are circling. I predict that we're going to see and hear ugly, vile comments starting Saturday morning. Sure, it's already starting, but I fear we haven't seen the worst from these hateful people yet.

39 posted on 06/09/2004 8:38:02 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (Torrance Ca....land of the flying monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

While these whores and jerkoffs are grumbling to each other, hundreds of thousands of grateful Americans stand in line for hours on end for the moment it takes to pay respects to a great man.


40 posted on 06/09/2004 8:38:39 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson