Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Cartoonist Defends Anti-Reagan Web Tirade (Terrorist Apologist Rall Squirming, Now...)
Washington Times ^ | 6/9/04 | Steve Miller

Posted on 06/08/2004 10:21:58 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:42:15 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Political cartoonist Ted Rall's comment that the late President Ronald Reagan is "turning crispy brown right about now" provoked a reaction that crashed his Web site for at least 24 hours after the remark was posted on the Drudge Report.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: godblessronaldreagan; liberalmediabias; rall; ronaldwilsonreagan; tedrall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: BradyLS

Sounds like Hell to me.


21 posted on 06/08/2004 10:45:37 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

You're just saying that to be nice. ;-)


22 posted on 06/08/2004 10:46:18 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Sooner or later, Rall is going to walk into a bar and be recognized by some former or off-duty Army Rangers, who are going to remember his vicious slander of Pat Tillman.

Ted Rall has had his ass kicked before. Speculation now is he may have been asking for it.

From Amazon.com:

Outrageous Ted recounts his junior-high years in the hands of a merciless bully who just wouldn¹t let up. Ted, now a strapping fella over 6 feet happily lost in the Big Apple, was at the time a wimp egghead lost in the middle of Nowheresville, Heartland, USA, and hated it with a passion. This no-holds-barred recollection begs the question: was his attitude such that maybe he deserved it?

23 posted on 06/08/2004 10:47:44 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Wakeup, Ted! Fellow liberal cartoonists don't like you!

Here's is the back cover to the first (of 2 so far) fundraising comics to defend a cartoonist against a lawsuit brought forth by Ted Rall. They are decidedly anti-Rall. Pulitzer Prizing winning cartoonist, Art Spiegelman drew the back cover. Note the Museum of Comic Gods. Art figures that just maybe Ted Rall would be included as a urinal fixture in the basement (lower left corner):

Welcome to the website Ted Rall doesn't want you to see!

24 posted on 06/08/2004 10:50:39 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: weegee

The Rangers are going to give him a beating he will remember and feel for the rest of his life. The kind that results in a permanent limp, and a lop-sided face. Couldn't happen to a nicer infected slug.


25 posted on 06/08/2004 10:52:05 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
Ted Rall is an anarchist-socialist who wants to see our consitutional form of government overthrown. Ted Rall needs to listen to Ronald Reagan's quotes again.

"We've been creeping closer to socialism, a system that someone once said works only in heaven, where it isn't needed, and in hell, where they've already got it."

Ted Rall, seen above, at home in "paradise".

26 posted on 06/08/2004 10:55:24 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Whereas "free speech" is protected, inciting a race war or class riot is not protected speech. Ted Rall can get his ass kicked someday.


27 posted on 06/08/2004 10:56:45 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Your opinion of him is much kinder than mine.


28 posted on 06/08/2004 10:56:55 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

It is!


29 posted on 06/08/2004 11:00:05 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"Still, I'm not a knee-jerk left-wing guy," Mr. Rall said. "I am an advocate of the Second Amendment;

KW: Some people on the right would say we're Americans because we have the right to bear arms, because we have constitutional liberties, the right to start our own businesses...

TR: The right to start your own business? They have that in China. What's the difference? That's not even unique to capitalism. But I agree with the right about certain things. I do think the right to own guns is an important freedom. But I believe in gun control in that not just anyone should be able to walk into a store and buy a gun. Obviously there should be stringent licensing requirements. You're required to have a license to own a dog, and dogs aren't quite as lethal as guns. But when the crunch comes people need to have guns. If they're all in the hands of the government authorities then only the government has any power.

Let's go ahead and "license" journalists too. Makes it easier to identify someone when they put a phoney post on a weblog. And that "right to free speech" could be stopped when it is used to incite a riot or murder. What a useful idiot.

30 posted on 06/08/2004 11:07:09 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I don't think that lying under oath gets you a ticket to hell, Mr. Rall. I would hardly deign to assume that Clinton is destined for Hades as a consequence.

I was one of those who was on the front lines hollering at Clinton during his time in office. When his time comes, you won't find me and dare I say, many of us, saying he is going to "fry". Given the opportunity, I'll wager that most of us right-wingers would prefer to remain silent rather than spew bitterly like Rall and his ilk. In fact, I could find constructive things to say about Clinton when the curtain closes one last time for him. He was a pretty positive person (unlike Kerry or Hillary) and he tried as hard as a person could to settle the conflict in the middle East. He is a fallible human like the rest of us and I deeply disagreed with his policies and what I felt was an overly casual attitude. But Hell, naw. It isn't up to me to determine.

Sheesh.

31 posted on 06/08/2004 11:11:56 PM PDT by Floratina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I think that this country has shifted so far over to the right that anyone who is a garden-variety Democrat circa 1972 is painted as a Marxist-Leninist."

Hey, I EXPECT all communists to hate Reagan, even after the passage of time -- he kicked their collective asses. I know the truth hurts, Ted, but if you are going to be a communist, then wear the name proudly...

32 posted on 06/08/2004 11:12:56 PM PDT by Migraine (my grain is pretty straight today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I often ponder how these libs will live with no oil, they really believe that food,clothing and shelter can be provided without the energy of oil.
33 posted on 06/08/2004 11:13:06 PM PDT by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

yeah, he really supports the 2nd Amendment. Thanks for the post.


34 posted on 06/08/2004 11:20:54 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: alaska-sgt
A google search of his site (which may not search everything he has there) only showed one reference to abortion, only another "relevant" mention of gun ownership (to fight the fascist conservatives), and NO mentions of the word "ammendment".

He's talking out of his ass to sound like an independent thinker.

He DID support the impeachment of Bill Clinton (and he was booed by liberals for that stance). However it was largely because he thought that Al Gore would be a much better President than Bill Clinton was. Also, I would find it impossible to say he was "the first" to support impeachment.

35 posted on 06/08/2004 11:32:03 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Ted Rall: "You're required to have a license to own a dog," [...]

Not in the free parts of the country, Ted...

36 posted on 06/08/2004 11:51:55 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: weegee
and NO mentions of the word "ammendment".

Perhaps he spelled it correctly.

37 posted on 06/08/2004 11:52:37 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

I stand corrected. Roughly 8 references to the "first amendment" (some pro- some con-). At least one was him whining about a joke perpetrated by "Dirty Danny".


38 posted on 06/09/2004 12:03:30 AM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
anyone who is a garden-variety Democrat circa 1972

His problem is that he actually thinks that the commies he hung out with back then were "garden-variety" Democrats. Now, of course, they actually ARE typical Democrats. He's one of the silly, perennially-protesting fools, that have never grown up. I have a notion that he's known John Kerry for some time.

39 posted on 06/09/2004 12:18:50 AM PDT by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Somehow, I just can't take this guy seriously enough to get mad at him. I mean, he's so over the edge, he's probably doing us more good than he is harm, just causing people to blow him off along with whatever publication he turns up in. I'm a lot more infuriated by the nutwork news anchors, whom I'd like to hang from lampposts. (Rall, I think I'd just shove into a cesspool...).

But, if we're going to get all worked up,

Mr. Rall's cartoons are distributed by Universal Press Syndicate and appear in about 140 publications, including the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and the San Jose (Calif.) Mercury-News. He also regularly posts his opinions at www.rall.com.

we should get a list together of every paper, everywhere, that publishes his cartoons, and just start circulating and publicizing the list, asking that people just cancel their subscriptions. There's probably ample reason independent of Rall's idiocies to boycott all those media outlets permanently anyway...

40 posted on 06/09/2004 12:37:00 AM PDT by fire_eye (Socialism is the opiate of academia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson