Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Fails Working Families, Sets Path for Border to Open to Unsafe Trucks
Teamsters Union / PR Newswire ^ | June 7, 2004 | staff

Posted on 06/07/2004 8:37:46 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING

Supreme Court Fails Working Families, Sets Path for Border to Open to Unsafe Trucks

WASHINGTON, June 7 /PRNewswire/ -- The United States Supreme Court today set back efforts by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Union and its allies to keep unsafe, unregulated Mexican trucks off our nation's highways.

By overturning a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, this opinion clears the path for the Bush Administration to allow Mexican trucks to travel throughout the United States.

"By allowing the Bush Administration to move forward with its plan to open the border, this decision represents a setback for all who advocate for safe roads, clean air, and a secure America," said Teamsters General President James P. Hoffa. "The Administration's ongoing push to open the border not only demonstrates a gross disregard for highway safety and the environment -- it belies the President's continued disregard for the health and welfare of Latino families living in the border region."

According to the procedures spelled out in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the President has the authority to permit Mexican carriers to operate throughout the United States without having to meet the same standards as domestic carriers with regard to truck safety, driver training and certification, pollution controls, and hazardous materials transport. Since the passage of NAFTA in 1993, the Teamsters Union has fought to keep the border closed until the establishment of uniform standards throughout the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

In 2001, President Bush announced his intention to lift the moratorium on Mexican truck operations in the U.S., regardless of the safety implications, once new regulations were prepared for granting operating authority to Mexican motor carriers. Before the moratorium was lifted, the Teamsters Union joined with allied organizations in a lawsuit to halt the President's actions. The suit contended that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), upon issuing its new regulations, failed to conduct a review of the environmental impact of increased truck traffic in the U.S. The Teamsters Union won that suit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, but the Supreme Court overturned that ruling.

The Supreme Court's ruling was based solely on the FMCSA's obligation to comply with the President's announcement. The Court, however, failed to consider the fact that the FMCSA still could have complied with the announcement after an environmental review was conducted. Instead, the Supreme Court decided to ignore the environmental health or welfare of U.S. citizens, including millions of Mexican American families living in the border region, who will be impacted the most by this decision.

"The ruling also raises security concerns. Without the proper security measures and adequate staffing at the Mexican border -- which still do not exist ten years after the passage of NAFTA -- the relevant agencies possess the ability to properly inspect only the smallest fraction of trucks that will be entering the United States every day," Hoffa added. "In light of the ongoing terror threat, this glaring security deficiency should concern every U.S. citizen."

"For all these reasons -- highway safety, the environment, and homeland security -- we again call on President Bush to keep the border closed, thereby putting the interests of average citizens above those of multi-national corporations."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Mexico
KEYWORDS: mexican; nafta; scotus; supremecourt; trade; trucking; trucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2004 8:37:48 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

Once again, our leaders have betrayed us. Our trucking industry will be sacrificed to offshoring and cheap labor, our roads unsafe, our insurance rates will rise.


2 posted on 06/07/2004 8:40:21 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING (He is faithful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

Living in CA I have to pay 50$ a year to keep my car certified for clean air standards, why should I have to pay for this but people from foreign countries don't when they drive here! This is outrages!


3 posted on 06/07/2004 8:43:42 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

why is this a good idea, i live in texas and do not want to be on the roads with these trucks. why is this being done/

shift key isn't working.


4 posted on 06/07/2004 8:44:22 PM PDT by inflation (Cuba = BAD, China = Good? Why, should not both be treated the way Cuba is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay
This is outrages!

Seriesly!

5 posted on 06/07/2004 8:48:24 PM PDT by dasboot (<img src="XXX">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: seastay

We have an annual inspection here in Massachusetts also.

I'm so disgusted with the entire illegal problem and now the trucks coming in I wonder what the hell US citizenship is worth anymore.

Sorry to rant,but I'm p****d!!!!!!!


7 posted on 06/07/2004 8:55:15 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

Don't you think the Teamsters would be a tad more persuasive if their releases didn't sound like a steaming heap of Kerry-esque platitudes and socialist sloganierism??


8 posted on 06/07/2004 8:56:03 PM PDT by dasboot (<img src="XXX">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mears

This is why I am going to sit this election out. I can't vote for Kerry and I'm beginning lose my taste for Bush.

The illegal immigration thing is why I am cashing out of California and moving back home to Montana.


9 posted on 06/07/2004 8:58:33 PM PDT by montomike (Gay means happy and carefree not an abomination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
"Once again, our leaders have betrayed us. Our trucking industry will be sacrificed to offshoring and cheap labor, our roads unsafe, our insurance rates will rise."

Not to mention the fact that illegals and terrorists will now find it easier than ever to enter the U.S.

10 posted on 06/07/2004 8:59:36 PM PDT by TheCrusader ("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dasboot

what is worse is that, in this case, they are right.


11 posted on 06/07/2004 8:59:46 PM PDT by inflation (Cuba = BAD, China = Good? Why, should not both be treated the way Cuba is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
A few rules as posted by DOT back in 2002 which may be revised by now....... Don't let them get in your way......

NAFTA Rules

U.S. Department of Transportation
Office of Public Affairs
Washington, D.C.
www.dot.gov/briefing.htm

March 14, 2002
Contact: Dave Longo
Telephone: 202-366-0456

North American Free Trade Agreement - U.S. Department of Transportation Regulations


I think these links are working .........

NAFTA Rules

49 CFR Parts 368 and 387 [Docket No. FMCSA-98-3297]
Revision of Regulations and Application Form for Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers To Operate in United States Municipalities and Commercial Zones on the United States-Mexico Border. PDF Version

49 CFR Part 365 [Docket No. FMCSA-98-3298]
Application by Certain Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers To Operate Beyond United States Municipalities and Commercial Zones on the United States-Mexico Border. PDF Version

49 CFR Part 385 [Docket No. FMCSA?98?3299]
Safety Monitoring System and Compliance Initiative for Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers Operating in the United States. - PDF Version -

49 CFR Parts 350 and 385 [Docket No. FMCSA?2001-11060]
Certification of Safety Auditors, Safety Investigators, and Safety Inspectors. - PDF Version -

49 CFR Part 393 [Docket No. FMCSA-01-10886]
Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Certification of Compliance with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSSs). - PDF Version -

49 CFR Part 567 [Docket No. NHTSA 02-11594; Notice 1]
Retroactive Certification of Commercial Vehicles by Motor Vehicle Manufacturers; Proposed Rule - PDF Version -

49 CFR Part 576 [Docket No. NHTSA 02-11592; Notice 1]
Recordkeeping and Record Retention; Proposed Rule - PDF Version -

49 CFR Part 591 [Docket No. NHTSA 02-11593; Notice 1]
Importation of Commercial Motor Vehicles; Proposed Rule - PDF File PDF Version - HTML Version

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Fact Sheet - PDF File PDF Version -

DOT Sets Safety Requirements For Mexican Trucks, Buses in United States - English Version -


12 posted on 06/07/2004 9:00:15 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

are these the same rules that us trucking has to follow or are they less strict/

my shift key is broken


13 posted on 06/07/2004 9:02:40 PM PDT by inflation (Cuba = BAD, China = Good? Why, should not both be treated the way Cuba is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: montomike

Montana? Aaaaw,come on!!

You don't want to come to Massachusetts?????(sarcasm off)


14 posted on 06/07/2004 9:02:43 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: inflation

From the above......

Mexican-domiciled carriers and U.S. and Canadian carriers are governed by the same safety standards when operating in the U.S.


15 posted on 06/07/2004 9:04:55 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: montomike

Ditto


16 posted on 06/07/2004 9:06:08 PM PDT by AUH2OY2K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: deport

will this be enforced as well as our current immigration laws/ mexico, for some reason, seams to get a lot more chances than our own citizens do.


17 posted on 06/07/2004 9:06:12 PM PDT by inflation (Cuba = BAD, China = Good? Why, should not both be treated the way Cuba is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
Sorry, don't get it.

Q: If the overlapping and multitudinous layers of US Guv bureaucricy weren't sucking hard-earned dollars from the working families AND businesses AND evil corporations, don't you think our WF's, B's and EC's could kick the competitive crap outta any place? Here on FR, we're always bitchin' n' moaning about high taxes and obscene regulatory "fees"; well, if the only way to kill it is by starvin' it...I'm FOR it.

Why don't y'all bite this snake on the head instead of the tail????

18 posted on 06/07/2004 9:06:25 PM PDT by dasboot (<img src="XXX">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
The real problem is our globalist/socialist leaders in positions of power. NAFTA was bad and FTAA will be even worse. The borders will be wide open (a la EU) with millions of central and south americans showing up on our door steps wanting welfare, free rent, free medical care etc..... The nomalizing rules buried in the FTAA require all countries signed on, to change their laws to match the other signers. The FTAA will be the end of our country's sovereignty. Every law seen as repugnant by the majority will have to be changed to please the majority(2nd amendment to start). We can't let George and his cohorts get this on by us.
19 posted on 06/07/2004 9:08:47 PM PDT by GvMeLbty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

Well now...don't THAT just spoil the Kerry/Teamster rabble-roust?


20 posted on 06/07/2004 9:09:03 PM PDT by dasboot (<img src="XXX">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson