To: been_lurking
my definition is based upon which nation charters the corporate headquarters, or which nation the corporation claims as it's corporate home.
42 posted on
06/07/2004 2:14:48 PM PDT by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: jpsb
So instead of fixing the tax code you'd rather that these corporations leave the US completely?
Or you'd rather they stay here and get taxed twice on foreign generated income?
47 posted on
06/07/2004 2:18:34 PM PDT by
VaBthang4
("He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps")
To: jpsb
"my definition is based upon which nation charters the corporate headquarters, or which nation the corporation claims as it's corporate home." Good for you! Stick to your guns, never let rational thought sway you from your deeply held convicitons about whatever it is you got stuck up your bum!
What color pony do you want?
48 posted on
06/07/2004 2:19:07 PM PDT by
Mad Dawgg
(French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
To: jpsb; been_lurking
my definition is based upon which nation charters the corporate headquarters, or which nation the corporation claims as it's corporate home.
By that definition, what is Daimler-Chrysler? And Ford cars sold in the US have more foreign content than Hondas. So what does that mean?
347 posted on
06/10/2004 5:56:35 AM PDT by
Cronos
(W2K4!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson