Skip to comments.
Accenture Wins Nod As Prime Contractor For US-Visit
Informationweek.com ^
| 6/1/2004
| Eric Chabrow
Posted on 06/07/2004 11:44:30 AM PDT by NormalGuy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-431 next last
To: Poohbah
"..we're still doomed." Yeah, and I heard we're all gonna die...
And its all Bush's fault!
(But, I still want my Pony!)
41
posted on
06/07/2004 2:14:18 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
To: been_lurking
my definition is based upon which nation charters the corporate headquarters, or which nation the corporation claims as it's corporate home.
42
posted on
06/07/2004 2:14:48 PM PDT
by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: NormalGuy
Corporations shouldn't be taxed at all. It just turns them into collection agencies for the government.
43
posted on
06/07/2004 2:16:04 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Poohbah
Man, it amazes me how close some of the anti-free-traders get to Rand's depiction of the "Fairness" bunch in "Atlas Shrugged."
44
posted on
06/07/2004 2:16:47 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
To: dead; VaBthang4; Mad Dawgg
Corporations shouldn't be taxed at all. It just turns them into collection agencies for the government.TWEET!
Use of logic and reason on an FR hot-button issue, twenty-yard penalty, FIRST DOWN!
45
posted on
06/07/2004 2:17:15 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
To: VaBthang4
If it set up an office in the Caribbean to avoid taxes, moronic though they may be, and said office became its headquarters, then by definition it is NOT an American company. Sheesh.
46
posted on
06/07/2004 2:18:03 PM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(It's not often you see Johnny Mathis in the wild.)
To: jpsb
So instead of fixing the tax code you'd rather that these corporations leave the US completely?
Or you'd rather they stay here and get taxed twice on foreign generated income?
47
posted on
06/07/2004 2:18:34 PM PDT
by
VaBthang4
("He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps")
To: jpsb
"my definition is based upon which nation charters the corporate headquarters, or which nation the corporation claims as it's corporate home." Good for you! Stick to your guns, never let rational thought sway you from your deeply held convicitons about whatever it is you got stuck up your bum!
What color pony do you want?
48
posted on
06/07/2004 2:19:07 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
To: VaBthang4
"Haha...it is sad to see just how dumb some of you are."
This from one you has only made one simi-intelient post thus far, and your insults are kinda lame too.
49
posted on
06/07/2004 2:21:49 PM PDT
by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: TXBSAFH
"Accenture, with operations in 48 countries, says it maintains no corporate headquarters."
This is how they describe themselves. 48 countries. Is Iraq or Saudi one. Maybe they will help out a fellow employee ;-). That sounds safe enough.
To: Mad Dawgg
All the clever folks are here I see, got anything to ad to the debate other then the same old tire lame insults?
51
posted on
06/07/2004 2:23:31 PM PDT
by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: Mad Dawgg
Man, it amazes me how close some of the anti-free-traders get to Rand's depiction of the "Fairness" bunch in "Atlas Shrugged."They're socialists with a nationalist tone.
52
posted on
06/07/2004 2:23:40 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
To: jpsb
53
posted on
06/07/2004 2:23:46 PM PDT
by
VaBthang4
("He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps")
To: Poohbah
>>> Accenture, with operations in 48 countries, says it maintains no corporate headquarters. <<<<
who's law is it under?
I'll bet development take place outside the US
And you trust government bureaucrats that much!
To: jpsb
2nd time:
So instead of fixing the tax code you'd rather that these corporations leave the US completely?
Or you'd rather they stay here and get taxed twice on foreign generated income?
55
posted on
06/07/2004 2:24:32 PM PDT
by
VaBthang4
("He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps")
To: VaBthang4
I'm think you for he am was trying to ensult you.
56
posted on
06/07/2004 2:24:34 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
Then the American worker shouldn't be taxed at all either --- why should we have to support a monstrous government which benefits foreign workers far more than it benefits us? Let the Chinese worker support the government.
57
posted on
06/07/2004 2:24:35 PM PDT
by
FITZ
To: dead
"Corporations shouldn't be taxed at all. It just turns them into collection agencies for the government." I had a customer ask we what I thought about the raise in local sales tax from 6.5 to 7.5% I said it did not matter to me and he was astonished.
He said: "But, aren't you upset you must pay higher taxes on your business?" No, sir as a Business I don't pay sales tax, you do.
58
posted on
06/07/2004 2:24:40 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
To: Poohbah
Nationalist Socialists...
Yeah that's really what we all need [again].
59
posted on
06/07/2004 2:25:53 PM PDT
by
VaBthang4
("He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps")
To: dead
60
posted on
06/07/2004 2:26:23 PM PDT
by
VaBthang4
("He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-431 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson