Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican candidates for President in 2008.

Posted on 06/03/2004 4:47:27 PM PDT by Big Daddy Paul

Who do ya'll think should run for President after George W leaves office?


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; petedupont; popularitycontest; prodeathcondi; prodeathgop; prodeathrudi; rinofreepers; whatsaconservative
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-333 next last
To: EternalVigilance

marked to read later...


281 posted on 06/04/2004 8:49:33 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Big Daddy Paul

Chris Smith (Rep, NJ) and Frank Wolf (Rep, VA) would make a great team. Don't disturb my dream for a few more minutes...


282 posted on 06/04/2004 8:50:57 AM PDT by NarniaSC (Wanted: a Neocon action figure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Here is his biography page
283 posted on 06/04/2004 8:53:46 AM PDT by Mulder (Those who would give up liberty for temporary security, deserve neither -- Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Artist

Thanks for the link. I'd like to hear a bit more from Rice herself and not a small blip attributed to her. Aside from the abortion issue, Rice has never held an elected position at any level of government. She needs to get her feet wet before even thinking about going for POTUS or VPOTUS.


284 posted on 06/04/2004 9:58:01 AM PDT by Reagan Man (The choice is clear. Reelect BUSH-CHENEY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: LS
If not Jeb, who? The lack of leadership in the GOP that rises to the level of presidential timber is disturbing.

Perhaps I'm pollyannaish, but if Bush has a successful second term, people may be clammering to continue the dynasty.

285 posted on 06/04/2004 10:10:10 AM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: sbhitchc

Scalia....hmmm. I like!


286 posted on 06/04/2004 10:12:35 AM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

You nailed it. The GOP needs a ticket which will beat The Beast.


287 posted on 06/04/2004 10:16:43 AM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
Unfortunately, the primary system is now front loaded (the reason for that was to make it difficult for another outsider like Reagan to get the nomination); and there are no big-name conservatives really pushing for conservative ideals anymore.

I think the only way to pull it off is through extensive use of the internet, sort of like what Howard Dean did last year. But then you saw how he was crushed by the media machine...

Unfortunately, you appear to be right. Even if an outside Conservative did gain a lot of popular support, the long-time politicians in the GOP would find a way to push them aside.

90% of those mentioned by people in this thread are career politicians. I don't foresee a major shake-up of the GOP anytime soon.

Basically those in the upper echelon of the GOP, or who are blessed so to speak, that's who your candidates for the next three or four election cycles will be.

288 posted on 06/04/2004 11:18:24 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Even if an outside Conservative did gain a lot of popular support, the long-time politicians in the GOP would find a way to push them aside.

Or their friends in the media. Look how quickly the insiders destroyed the candicacy of Howard Dean, who was not the "chosen candidate".

90% of those mentioned by people in this thread are career politicians.

Most are big-government statists that oppose the 2nd amendment. How any "conservative" can support them is beyond me.

Basically those in the upper echelon of the GOP, or who are blessed so to speak, that's who your candidates for the next three or four election cycles will be.

Yep. "They" will tell us who the nominee will be. It's a catch-22. If their guy wins the general election, they will use that as an excuse to move further left (see, we told you only a 'moderate' could win). OTOH, if their guy loses, they will blame conservatives (see, we need someone even more liberal to run).

289 posted on 06/04/2004 11:54:01 AM PDT by Mulder (Those who would give up liberty for temporary security, deserve neither -- Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Mulder

Thanks.
Reading it now.


290 posted on 06/04/2004 11:54:48 AM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Mulder

YES!
I like him.
Nice family too.


291 posted on 06/04/2004 11:56:09 AM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: zygoat

Tom Delay..........dang I love that man! What about Ensign (sp) from Nevada???? Jeff Sessions from Alabama??? Condi would be a good running mate......but she may get "groomed before 2008. I'd vote for her in a minute. Don Nickell from Oklahoma and yes John Kasic (sp)........the list is endless.


292 posted on 06/04/2004 12:02:01 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group

Buchanan is too full of himself. I agree with most of what he stands for, but the way he presents himself throws it all out the window. IMHO.


293 posted on 06/04/2004 12:04:58 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

Naw, even though she's my Senator.........naw. Not right for the job. Too moderate.


294 posted on 06/04/2004 12:07:51 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TejasRose

Rose, he fixed his britches with me when he signed that hate crimes bill. I don't like limp-spined politicians.


295 posted on 06/04/2004 12:13:12 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: CurlyBill

I'd vote JDJC08 - but the GOP does not have the guts.


296 posted on 06/04/2004 12:14:59 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: All
Who would I like or who will I probably have to hold my nose and vote for?

Like:

The only true conservatives left in the GOP with national name recognition:

Willam Bennett

Dr. Alan Keyes

Sen. Rick Santorum

Steve Forbes (remember him??)

Rep. JC Watts

Hold my nose and vote for:

Rudy Guiliani

Sec. Colin Powell

Sen. John McCain

Others mentioned

Rumsfield is too old, if hed wanted the job he would have run 20 years ago.

America won't elect 3 Bushs

The constitution won't be changed to accomdate Arnold

America is not ready for a woman president, least of all a black woman (Condi)

Haley who? (I know, but not many outside of MS do)

Gingrich is finished politically

297 posted on 06/04/2004 12:15:03 PM PDT by kjvail (Light 'em up George!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawgreg
Tom Delay..........dang I love that man!

I agree with you there!! He's great. As far as Rick Perry being limp spined....can we say RINO? ;-)

298 posted on 06/04/2004 1:16:05 PM PDT by TejasRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: TejasRose
I agree with you there!! He's great. As far as Rick Perry being limp spined....can we say RINO? ;-)

You can't say that about Perry, you act as though he was an up and coming star of the DNC before realizing which way the wind was blowing and switching to the GOP..waitaminute, he was an up and coming star of the DNC and he did switch when he saw what was happening...

299 posted on 06/04/2004 1:26:23 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
Most are big-government statists that oppose the 2nd amendment. How any "conservative" can support them is beyond me.
...
Yep. "They" will tell us who the nominee will be. It's a catch-22. If their guy wins the general election, they will use that as an excuse to move further left (see, we told you only a 'moderate' could win). OTOH, if their guy loses, they will blame conservatives (see, we need someone even more liberal to run).

I would love to have a real choice among candidates. Unfortunately, the GOP leadership picks the candidates who can pull in the most central/moderate votes, because they know we won't vote for a liberal.

I really don't see the GOP going back to the right in the near future. I love how the liberals portray the GOP as a bunch of right-wing religious fanatics, when in fact, we are headed by mostly moderates.

I'll probably catch some flak for saying this, but I really think we can do better than what we have and what we will have, in regards to the upper GOP. It's just those that can do better know they don't stand a chance coming from the outside/Conservative beliefs, or they don't want to sink down to what campaigning has become these days. Used to be you could run on your personal merit. Now it's how bad you can make the other person look. Unfortunately, the GOP engages in these tactics almost as much as the DNC. I see this at the county level.

300 posted on 06/04/2004 1:35:46 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-333 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson