Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"THE" Reason We Went Into Iraq
Inside Scoop - Fox News Channel ^ | Sunday, 5-23-2004 | Eric Shawn & John Loftus

Posted on 05/23/2004 3:53:42 PM PDT by Matchett-PI

Edited on 05/23/2004 5:21:43 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Host Eric Shawn

Guest: John Loftus (the author of four histories about Intelligence operations, a consultant for CBS 60 MINUTES and ABC - PRIME TIME, among others. He was a prosecutor with the U.S. Justice Department Nazi hunting unit with unprecedented access to top secret C.I.A. and NATO archives)

Under discussion is this story in the NY Times today:

Evidence Is Cited Linking Koreans to Libya Uranium New York Times ^ | 5/23/04 | DAVID E. SANGER and WILLIAM J. BROAD

Excerpt transcribed by me from my videotape:

Eric Shawn: "John Loftus told us about it months ago right here on Inside Scoop. John, that's why we call it, 'Inside Scoop' - you beat the New York Times again. Congratulations!"

John Loftus: "Thank you very much."

Eric: "How do you do it?"

John: "Well, ummm, this little country lawyer used to have a Q clearance for nuclear weapons secrets and I was told about this amazing wiretap where British Intelligence overheard a call from North Korea to Libya saying, 'My god, if the Americans ever go into Iraq, they're going to find out about our nuclear program. And who's going to pay all the Iraqi nuclear scientists in Libya if Saddam falls?''"

Eric: "You're saying before the war there were Iraqi nuclear scientists working on a potential bomb in Libya before we launched this [war in Iraq]?

John: "Yeah. This was a treaty signed by a man called Ali Sobree (sp?). He was the foreign minister of Iraq. And he went to Khadafy and they worked out a whole protocol. Khadafy would donate a hollowed out mountain in Libya; Iraq would provide the nuclear scientists, and North Korea would provide the uranium. And they would literally make a factory for nuclear weapons. And once that factory was complete, we had lost the war on terrorism. People don't realize that even a small nuclear weapon can kill 300,000 people. That's one hundred 9-11's. So that's why we put [garbled] bin Laden on the back burner -- we were really focusing on getting the Ali Sobree protocol - we had to smash that ring."

Eric: "Now when you talk about Saddam and the war on terror - we've had conversations - your indication is that President Bush understood this after 9-11 and he was mostly concerned about a nuclear bomb from Libya or Iraq or Iran."

John: "Eric, that's EXACTLY it. Within a month after 9-11, British wiretaps showed that we had a MAJOR risk. Nuclear weapons in terrorist's hands would be devastating. And that's why the president said, 'OK, we're gonna shift the emphasis from Afghanistan and Osama bin Laden. We're gonna go into Iraq - that's where the evidence is - we have to capture Ali Sobree."

Eric: "Yeah, but critics say, 'Oh the war is about oil' - ' The war is about democracy'. You say there's someting else going on. ..."

John: "This is absolutely necessary, Eric. Had we not smashed the program, within the next 3 or 4 months - on the schedule they were on - Libya would have finished the nuclear factory - we couldn't touch it. We were designing nuclear bunker-busters to try and get into the mountain [but] even that wouldn't work. Once the Islamic bomb was finished - America - the rest of the western nations were finished. We couldn't stand city after city evaporating by nuclear weapons."

Eric: "In other words, going into Iraq, in your view, having Khadafy now basically give up and surrender everything to us, getting the connection to North Korea and Iran - was a major strategy in the war on terror?"

John: "It was THE major strategy. Khadafy has now confirmed he is going to hand the Ali Sobree protocols over to the United States. Sobree, himself, is now in US custody and he is already scheduled as one of the first three witnesses in the trial of Saddam Hussein.

Sadam's biggest crime? While he was starving his own people to death, his money and his scientists were hiding in Libya to make a factory for nuclear weapons to attack any major power in the world." ...

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alisobree; ericshawn; fox; insidescoop; iran; iraq; johnloftus; khadafy; loftus; northkorea; prewarintelligence; proliferation; saddam; sobree; uranium; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 next last

bookmark


101 posted on 05/23/2004 11:27:59 PM PDT by GeorgiaYankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
"I will give the GOP one more chance. After this election, I want to see some truth. I want to see some conservative judges. I want to see some agressive stance with regard to the treasonous parasites among us, and tax reform, and securing the borders, and the size and scope of government. "

I think that is all possible. . .if, that is, we secure a larger majority in Congress; and get even a few Repubs with a spine who will not defend, placate or ignore the indefensible that is gifted to America through the generousity of the Democrats; who are without a doubt, a scourge upon our planet.

102 posted on 05/23/2004 11:45:58 PM PDT by cricket (Liberals are a scourge . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI; King Prout; Alamo-Girl; onyx; ALOHA RONNIE; SpookBrat; Republican Wildcat; Howlin; ...
"THE" Reason We Went Into Iraq

Excerpt:

John: "Eric, that's EXACTLY it. Within a month after 9-11, British wiretaps showed that we had a MAJOR risk. Nuclear weapons in terrorist's hands would be devastating. And that's why the president said, 'OK, we're gonna shift the emphasis from Afghanistan and Osama bin Laden. We're gonna go into Iraq - that's where the evidence is - we have to capture Ali Sobree."

Eric: "Yeah, but critics say, 'Oh the war is about oil' - ' The war is about democracy'. You say there's someting else going on. ..."

John: "This is absolutely necessary, Eric. Had we not smashed the program, within the next 3 or 4 months - on the schedule they were on - Libya would have finished the nuclear factory - we couldn't touch it. We were designing nuclear bunker-busters to try and get into the mountain [but] even that wouldn't work. Once the Islamic bomb was finished - America - the rest of the western nations were finished. We couldn't stand city after city evaporating by nuclear weapons."

Eric: "In other words, going into Iraq, in your view, having Khadafy now basically give up and surrender everything to us, getting the connection to North Korea and Iran - was a major strategy in the war on terror?"

John: "It was THE major strategy. Khadafy has now confirmed he is going to hand the Ali Sobree protocols over to the United States. Sobree, himself, is now in US custody and he is already scheduled as one of the first three witnesses in the trial of Saddam Hussein.

Sadam's biggest crime? While he was starving his own people to death, his money and his scientists were hiding in Libya to make a factory for nuclear weapons to attack any major power in the world." ...


Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.


103 posted on 05/24/2004 3:30:07 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is ONLY ONE good Democrat: one that has just been voted OUT of POWER ! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
Thanks for the ping !!! :^D

104 posted on 05/24/2004 3:38:05 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is ONLY ONE good Democrat: one that has just been voted OUT of POWER ! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
Here's another reason we went into Iraq, I'll post it large so the libs who lurk here can read it while tracing the words with their fingers: Clinton appointed U.S. District Court judge Harold Baer has made a legal finding that Iraq was behind the 9-11 attacks. His ruling was upheld by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals.

...chew 'em up...spit 'em out!!!

105 posted on 05/24/2004 5:36:38 AM PDT by Kate of Spice Island (sKerry to imagine the Kerry's swearing around Tony Blair or anyone else in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

"In case you are finished packing , the original post is back after some high level pleading!"

I am 95% finished packing- and thank you Ernest for your high-level pleading!


106 posted on 05/24/2004 6:35:55 AM PDT by SE Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

bttt^


107 posted on 05/24/2004 7:50:46 AM PDT by FBD (...Please press 2 for English...for Espanol, please stay on the line...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim; Landru; sultan88; jla; Grampa Dave

John: "Well, ummm, this little country lawyer used to have a Q clearance for nuclear weapons secrets and I was told about this amazing wiretap where British Intelligence overheard a call from North Korea to Libya saying, 'My god, if the Americans ever go into Iraq, they're going to find out about our nuclear program. And who's going to pay all the Iraqi nuclear scientists in Libya if Saddam falls?''"

Eric: "You're saying before the war there were Iraqi nuclear scientists working on a potential bomb in Libya before we launched this [war in Iraq]?

John: "Yeah. This was a treaty signed by a man called Ali Sobree. He was the foreign minister of Iraq. And he went to Khadafy and they worked out a whole protocol. Khadafy would donate a hollowed out mountain in Libya; Iraq would provide the nuclear scientists, and North Korea would provide the uranium. And they would literally make a factory for nuclear weapons. And once that factory was complete, we had lost the war on terrorism. People don't realize that even a small nuclear weapon can kill 300,000 people. That's one hundred 9-11's. So that's why we put bin Laden on the back burner -- we were really focusing on getting the Ali Sobree protocol - we had to smash that ring."


108 posted on 05/24/2004 7:59:13 AM PDT by FBD (...Please press 2 for English...for Espanol, please stay on the line...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Major story bump! Thanks for posting.

(Placeholding for later careful read.)


109 posted on 05/24/2004 8:04:31 AM PDT by RottiBiz (Help end Freepathons -- become a Monthly Donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

"If this is correct, why isn't the administration touting it?"

Strategy, strategy - wait for GWB's poll numbers drop to 40% and then spring this on the public. Dis-avow everything stated before and start with a 'clean slate'. This is just the poker player in W coming out.


110 posted on 05/24/2004 8:08:48 AM PDT by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Bush...place these facts onto the table TONIGHT!


111 posted on 05/24/2004 8:11:20 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"If this is correct, why isn't the administration touting it?"

I believe there are two good reasons.

1. get as much of the network rolled up as possible before divulging what we know.(This is problem THE reason)
2. The election is still a ways off.

Makes a really good Bush UN speech in September, don't you think?
112 posted on 05/24/2004 8:14:07 AM PDT by snooker (John Flipping Kerry, the enemy's choice in Vietnam, the enemy's choice in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FBD
"This was a treaty signed by a man called Ali Sobree (sp?). He was the foreign minister of Iraq. And he went to Khadafy and they worked out a whole protocol. Khadafy would donate a hollowed out mountain in Libya; Iraq would provide the nuclear scientists, and North Korea would provide the uranium. And they would literally make a factory for nuclear weapons. And once that factory was complete, we had lost the war on terrorism. People don't realize that even a small nuclear weapon can kill 300,000 people. That's one hundred 9-11's. So that's why we put [garbled] bin Laden on the back burner -- we were really focusing on getting the Ali Sobree protocol - we had to smash that ring."

Between now and November, the link between Soddom's Insane and WMDs must be focused on, and the linkages must be made clear to the entire voting populace. To claim that Iraq didn't have WMDs is RIDICULOUS!!

FReegards...MUD

113 posted on 05/24/2004 8:16:37 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: FBD

Thanks for ping. This looks important!


114 posted on 05/24/2004 8:18:19 AM PDT by sultan88 ("I went down Virginia, seeking shelter from the storm...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
If this is correct, why isn't the administration touting it?

When cowboys are playing high-stakes poker they seldom tip thier hands until the betting is all done.

115 posted on 05/24/2004 8:43:23 AM PDT by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI; oldglory; JulieRNR21; gonzo; Bob Ireland
Great read, excellent post. Thanks for the transcription!

JANICE ROCKS, BTTT!!

(Love those FloRida FReepers!!)

116 posted on 05/24/2004 8:47:00 AM PDT by mcmuffin (Wipe out the Red diaper-doper babies- Vote Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Q clearance is the DOE / NNSA version of Top Secret.


117 posted on 05/24/2004 9:15:36 AM PDT by Cooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

I wish, I wish with all my might
For GWB to air this
During sweeps week tonight


118 posted on 05/24/2004 9:27:03 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Only those who dare truly live - CGA 88 Class Motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
I wish, I wish with all my might For GWB to air this During sweeps week tonight

I'll think he'll wait until the networks actually broadcast his speech...

119 posted on 05/24/2004 9:31:25 AM PDT by pookie18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Hmm.


120 posted on 05/24/2004 9:32:08 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson