Moderator: Check out this PM I got:

[Behind Liberal Lines]

See my comment. Didn't know how else to contact you.

[tacticalogic]

I pledge on this Memorial Day weekend we have a liberal "cook-off" lets see who can nail them and BBQ them first. :)

You'll need a good hot fire and a piece of pork to get them done evenly. No matter how you arrange them on the grill they'll keep ending up in a pile over on the left side. If you put some pork over on the right side, they'll move all the way over there to get close to it, and all you have to do is keep moving it around.

[WinOne4TheGipper]

O’Really, Limbaugh, Hannity, Drudge, Matthews, Horowitz, Ingraham, Goldberg, Liddy, Roberts, Novak, North, Robertson, Fallwell and on, and on, and on

You might tell your little troll that all of these people are what is called commentators. They're supposed to give their opinion on the news. Reporters and news anchors aren't supposed to give their opinion, yet that doesn't stop them at ABCNNBCBS.

[solo gringo]

I got the same garbage Also.

[apackof2]

He seems to have a unnatural interest in bodily functions and school boy fantasy sex

[Erik Latranyi]

Give these people control of the Democrat Party...

Don't they HAVE it now??

No, they do not have a candidate that will enact their agenda. Kerry is too weak-kneed to stand up for something.

As I said, Dean was their best hope and they are mad about what happened to him.

[LadyShallott]

Thank you for the cooking tips. I was wondering why the slant occured on my BBQ. Now I know. LOL

[veronica]

And if this moron had actually looked at my profile page, he or she would have seen that I actually quote a line from JFK's brilliant inaugural speech, which no doubt was written or tweaked by Ted Sorenson.

That however has nothing to do with Sorenson using a commencement address as a DNC-sponsored Bush-bashing fest.

[Erik Latranyi]

That however has nothing to do with Sorenson using a commencement address as a DNC-sponsored Bush-bashing fest.

You have been found guilty by association and for the audacity to question true liberal authority.

[fortunecookie]

Ping!

[earonthief]

This guy's Depends are to tight around his head.

[rageaholic]

Funny, a guy who's punctuation is this bad

you’re argument’s not looking too watertight

has the nerve to accuse somebody else of

writing English like it’s a fourth language.

Another hypocrite who can't be taken seriously.

[Americanwolf]

is there a cure for that???? oh... got the point, but that is a crappy (no pun intended) visual or thought even for a sat morn.

[section9]

One of the things that they do in the Valley of the F*#ktards is to scream that there is No Liberal Media. The assweasel who wrote this really wants us to believe that liberals do not control the content of CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, the Washington Post, the New York Times, or the Los Angeles Times. Now they actually know that the opposite is the case, but one must remember that to a liberal, assertion is as good as fact.

His adulation of Theodore Sorensen is misplaced. Sorensen didn't save the world, Kennedy did. Sorensen was a hack who came up with good speech lines, enough of them to keep him in good stead as one of Jack and Bobby's paid errand boys. People only listen to him for the same reason they listen to that washed up old has-been Arthur Schlesinger: he was associated with Prince John of Camelot, so it rubs off.

The rest of this is standard Bush and Conservative bashing, and really contains very little argument to write home about. If this is actually Franken, I'm not surprised. Apparently, the acme of his skill is demonstrated by a surprising tendency to yell "F*#k You, Wolfowitz!" at Paul Wolfowitz at Washington gatherings.

Which just goes to show you that even swine are attracted to pearls.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

[DefCon]

the south lost
Since May 22, 2004

[Riley]

Let see: O’Really, Limbaugh, Hannity, Drudge, Matthews, Horowitz, Ingraham, Goldberg, Liddy, Roberts, Novak, North, Robertson, Fallwell and on, and on, and on. Man, what a bunch of *flaming* liberals!

You point to a few individuals. We can point to whole organizations. Time, Newsweek, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, the Washington Post, Knight-Ridder, yup, a real bunch of *Reagan Conservatives* if I ever saw them.

Clinton got a pass on everything he did. The pattern was to ignore the serious stuff that he did like sleazy dealings with avowed enemies like North Korea and China, briefly puff up minor things that he did and then dismiss them as mere 'conservative politics', thus neutralizing any criticism from the Right. The media ran interference for Clinton, and you know it.

The Lewinsky thing wasn't even on my radar screen. Never mind that a partner in any corporation that I have worked for would have been cleaning out his desk before the day was over if he was caught boffing an intern. That whole thing was unpresidential and diminished the credibility of the office.

Clinton was, and continues to be a presidential Al Capone. If we have to go after him for income tax evasion, that's what we do. Personally, I think that the Republican leadership could have picked a better issue to nail him on, like transfer of nuclear weapons technology to a country that would love to be powerful enough to directly threaten us globally, in exchange for campaign contributions.

[DefCon]

seems to still be active to me.

the south lost
Since May 22, 2004

[TheBattman]

This would be funny - if it wasn't such an accurate portrayal of the left....and just how depraved and plagued with hallucinations they are....

The Kool-Aid must be mixed extra strong....

[clyde260]

"This guy suffers from chronic rectal tearing."

You managed to say it all in one clear, concise sentence. Thank you, I needed that!!

[Erik Latranyi]

The assweasel who wrote this really wants us to believe that liberals do not control the content of CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, the Washington Post, the New York Times, or the Los Angeles Times.

Actually, to these people, CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, the Washington Post, the New York Times and the Los Angleles Times does not represent their views because these people are politically to the left of those institutions.

These are the people who protest in the streets against capitalism.

These are the people who see conspiracy theories everywhere in the Bush Administration.

These are the people who believe a reduction in the number of conservatives would lead to cleaner water, greener grass and clearer skies.

[TheBattman]

It's all those gerbils he's going through from the local pet shop - he is, after all their best customer......