Skip to comments.
ARMY ANNOUNCES RECONFIGURATION OF FOURTH STRYKER BRIGADE
US Army News Release ^
| May 14, 2004
Posted on 05/14/2004 1:18:48 PM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4
The Army announced today that it will adjust the design of the fourth Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT) from a Cavalry to an Infantry configuration.
The 2d Armored Cavalry Regiment (Light), stationed at Fort Polk, La., will begin the transformation to an Infantry-based Stryker Brigade upon its return from Operation Iraqi Freedom. The unit is expected to attain an initial operational capability (IOC) as an infantry-designed SBCT by late 2006.
The conversion of the 2d ACR to an infantry-centric SBCT supports the Armys transition to modularity, standardizes the design for all six planned SBCTs, and increases the number of Army infantry formations available to combatant commanders worldwide to set the tempo of battle and act decisively against enemy forces.
Global demands for infantry-centric formations, coupled with the Armys ongoing transformation to modularity, require a change in design for the fourth Stryker Brigade Combat Team, from a cavalry construct to a standard infantry-centric SBCT formation, said Col. Ben Allen, Director of Integration, Department of the Army Programs.
The design change will not change the home stationing for the unit at Fort Polk.
For more information:
Please contact Maj. Gary Tallman at 703-697-4314, gary.tallman@hqda.army.mil
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; US: Louisiana; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2ndacr; banglist; sbct; stryker; strykerbrigade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
This is severely < messed > up. 168 years of glory pissed away. You can dismount cavalry, but you can't make them
infantry-centric.This is a crying shame. A wheeled armored cavalry regiment with Strykers instead of Bradleys and Centauros or some kind of mobile gun system that actually works instead of M1's had the potential to be a pretty capable force.
Does Armor Branch have any say in anything anymore?
To: Cannoneer No. 4
From AIRPLANE 2 "Hmmm, Stryker......Stryker.....STRYKER!......" ............
2
posted on
05/14/2004 1:21:22 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(KERRY'S LAW: FOR EVERY ACTION THERE IS AN EQUAL & OPPOSITE RETRACTION.........)
To: af_vet_rr; ALOHA RONNIE; American in Israel; American Soldier; archy; armymarinemom; BCR #226; ...
Stryker Brigade Combat Team Tactical Studies Group (Chairborne)
![](http://www.americasarmy.pl/zdjecia/1050614509stryker.jpg)
3
posted on
05/14/2004 1:22:43 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
It seems like it ought to mean something to me. What exactly are the implications of such a reconfiguration? I'm not sure I know the difference between one Army unit and another. I was in the Marines.
4
posted on
05/14/2004 1:24:52 PM PDT
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: archy; Gringo1; Matthew James; Fred Mertz; Squantos; colorado tanker; The Shrew; SLB; Darksheare; ..
Free Republic Treadhead Ping
5
posted on
05/14/2004 1:27:30 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4; *bang_list
Once upon a time, the First Cavalry Division had all its Infantry battalions trace their lineage to four Cavalry Regiments. A rose by any other name is still as sweet.
6
posted on
05/14/2004 1:30:33 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
It seems that neither armor nor artillery has any sway on anything these days.
Kinda like the, "Let's take 13bravos and make them MP's!"
(Or combat engineers..)
And then they wonder where their artillery support went, so much so that they started pulling the howitzers from ski resorts.
Cav troopers are a different breed, their mindset and thinking is somewhat different than infantry.
But, being malleable and adaptable, they will eventually make it work.
But there may be snags first.
7
posted on
05/14/2004 1:35:30 PM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Bretheren & Sisteren In Chaos Inc, LLC "We're All About Bad Ideas!")
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Veterans of the 1st Cavalry Division who fought throughout WWII as dismounted cavalry (read infantry) might disagree with you. There will be a big knock-down drag out over unit designations for units in TF Modularity - combined arms battalions (armor, infantry, both ??), RSTA (cavalry, armor, ??). I'm sure that the 2d Cavalry will remain on the books, but its days as an armored cavalry regiment per se are probably short lived. The same applies to 3d ACR, not sure that Armored Cavalry Regiments make it in the force of tomorrow.
To: centurion316
I'll be surprised if Corps commanders don't want to retain Armored Cavalry Regiments for scouting and covering force missions.
9
posted on
05/14/2004 1:53:20 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: William Terrell
The Armored Cavalry Regiments were unique. They were combined arms mini-divisions that were often given divison-sized missions. The 3 line squadrons had mixed tank/scout troops, tank companies and howitzer batteries. Many considered them the elite of the armored force. For decades
11th and
2nd ACRs manned the ramparts of the frontier of freedom in Europe.
10
posted on
05/14/2004 2:20:01 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: centurion316; Tailback
11
posted on
05/14/2004 2:34:05 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: neverdem
"
...retain Armored Cavalry Regiments for scouting and covering force missions..."
Sounds like an old refrain, 'who needs tracks on the ground when we can do all that with unmanned drones and electonics...'
Didn't work worth a damn for intelligence.
12
posted on
05/14/2004 2:36:37 PM PDT
by
norton
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Ok. "Calvary" replaced horses with machinery, basically, maintaining the fearsome and heavy nature of the horse charge against foot soldiers. So, what, they're are willing to give up the psychological advantage of death steel for flexibility?
I can see how this could be slightly more applicable to municipal conflicts, but there is a lot more open country than cities, anywhere you go.
Thinking aobut it, I wouldn't imagine the lower echelon officers and men think much of this.
13
posted on
05/14/2004 2:49:17 PM PDT
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: William Terrell
http://www.cavalrycountry.org/cavalry.htm
No, they are giving up firepower, mobility and shock and esprit d'corps for infantrycentricity.
14
posted on
05/14/2004 3:21:01 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: William Terrell
15
posted on
05/14/2004 3:26:34 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Does Armor Branch have any say in anything anymore? Yes. They are trying to introduces horses on the TO&E! :~)
16
posted on
05/14/2004 3:37:44 PM PDT
by
verity
To: Cannoneer No. 4
17
posted on
05/14/2004 3:52:15 PM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(In God We Trust. All Others We Monitor.)
To: VeniVidiVici; Yasotay
I believe we tried those and found them wanting.
18
posted on
05/14/2004 4:27:06 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: verity
19
posted on
05/14/2004 4:34:39 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
And why do our enemies need to know that?
20
posted on
05/14/2004 4:38:32 PM PDT
by
AIBC
(Bring in the tanks!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson