Posted on 05/14/2004 12:09:26 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
Possibly something like, "wait, this wasn't in the script!"
Well i dont wish any one to look at the video of the russian but there is a big descrepancy in the ways the blood comes out...I am sorry this is just sick!
More likely, the Islamos get the unrated version.
Sun International Victims Father Says
scroll down page to find story.
Yes, there is some blood. But not the amount of blood that comes from a living body with a beating heart.
P.S. But I appreciate your analysis and it made me realize that two cameras WERE used with gaps in the editing for some unknown purpose.
P.P.S. Do you think that White Hood finished the job after Black Hood couldn't manage to cut between the bones of the spinal column?
He said he was killed by his friends? Weird...
As for keeping up, I don't have time to read every single thread on a subject.
Last I knew, yeah he had some links to terrorists, but nothing substantial.
Plus, he was a Bush supporter, even helping out at the 2000 convention.
bump...
Knock it off
AMEN!
I could greatly respect someone who wanted to stuff your post in every available orifice of Berg's father.
the idiot.
I forced myself to watch the video, because I knew this was something I had to do, draw my cnclusions and be done with this lesson.
I am a country boy too and I have also seen animals being killed. When animals are first electrocuted and then their blood drained, the flow is not as strong.
I also noticed how still and calm he was throughout all this lengthy speech - his body language was inadequate for the kind of situation he was in.
Today I also heard from some TV stations , that he had been learning Arabic and that he met with his deceased sister's husband. This makes me think that he probably knew at least a little Arabic to know what was about to happen.
My conclusions:
1) He was drugged with some drug or medicine, which slows down the heartbeat - this explains why the flow of blood was not strong and his behaviour during the speech, as well as the lack of any violent response to the attackers when they did it;
2) The screams are too long, compared to the time of the killing. After the first cut, there could be no more screams;
3) The above 2 points make me conclude that the killers must have recorded him screaming before that by using some scary tactic to make him scream while he was conscious;
(BTW, do we have samples of his voice from home videos, speeches or other sources? Have those been compared to the screams in the video? Do we know for sure these are his screams and not somebody elses?)
We all know the rest. Obviously their main goals are:
1) to deliver the message to their supporters - "Allah akbar', etc., i.e. recruiting purpose among Muslims;
2) to deliver a message to everybody in the USA camp and to those who think of joining the US camp - this is what expects you, if you do not give up and leave;
It is gruesome, sickening and IMO very miscalculating on their part. This deed did not promote their cause.
Not necessary. The skull sits on a projection and can be easily removed. It is primarily muscle which holds it in place.
WOuld that be the case for the Russian beheaded by Chechens? His blood didn't spurt either.
In fact, I don't think it's true that blood has to SPURT, it may pour out or what have you, but if that Russian POW video is any indication, blood need not spurt out when a head is being sawed off.
I really do not want to listen that close to try to determine what he was screaming.
It was horrendous enough without trying to pick out his words.
BUMP
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.