That's why it is a gay porn ring in our "don't ask, don't tell" prison police...because "souvenier" picture takers wouldn't be taking thousands of snapshots of felonies and nude war crimes...but lustful gay porn rings certainly would be.
I'm not sure I see what difference this makes.
In fact, I find a bit preposterous that reservists (two of whom are engaged and conceived a child) are part of a "gay ring."
I heard Medved posit this on Thursday.
It could also be that, like tornado-chasers, there are some people who just get off on sado-masichism, regardless of their sexual orientation.
We just can't have this stuff. I saw my Catholic Church raked over the coals for covering up sexual abuse, and deservedly so.
It's painful to think that a few in our military think it's just dandy to strip down human beings and beat them, or rape them, or sic dogs on them, or use them for photographic props.
These are deranged SOBs, IMO.
Two of the prisoners were involved in a heterosexual relationship. These kinds of theories make little sense, except as an attempt to politicize the issue even further.
I would suggest that this makes you look as though you're attempting to turn this episode into a chance to further a political agenda re: gays out of the military. While that may be a fair debate, in this context you will harm the cause you wish to further. JMHO.