Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Full Range of Technology Is Applied to Bomb Falluja
NY Times ^ | April 30, 2004 | ERIC SCHMITT and THOM SHANKER

Posted on 04/29/2004 9:28:05 PM PDT by neverdem

ARMAMENT

WASHINGTON, April 29 — The airstrikes in Falluja in the past three days by American warplanes and helicopter gunships have been the most intense aerial bombardment in Iraq since major combat ended nearly a year ago, military officials said Thursday.

In the past 48 hours, Air Force F-15E and F-16 warplanes, and carrier-based F-14 and F-18 fighter-bombers, have dropped about three dozen 500-pound laser-guided bombs in three different sections of Falluja, Air Force officials said, destroying more than 10 buildings and 2 sniper nests identified by troops as sources of attacking fire, and other targets.

By day, AH-1W Super Cobra helicopters have hovered over the city, launching Hellfire missiles at guerrillas who fire on the Marines. By night, lumbering AC-130 gunships have pounded trucks and cars ferrying fighters with the distinctive thump-thump of 105-millimeter howitzers. British Tornado ground-attack planes are also flying missions over Falluja, and remotely piloted Predator reconnaissance aircraft prowl the skies.

But Falluja is not only a military target; it also holds incalculable symbolic power. A bloodbath might return the city to American control, only to galvanize resistance around the country.

Commanders say they go to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties, but they acknowledge they do not know how many civilians have died in recent attacks. Pilots concede that in at least one case, an American warplane mistakenly bombed the wrong building in Falluja.

"The big problem now is that friendlies, civilians and bad guys are all mixed together," Brig. Gen. Jack Egginton, commander of the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, said in a telephone interview from his base in the Persian Gulf.

The stepped-up air assault has sought to minimize the risks to both civilians and the military, senior officers said. Bombs guided by lasers or satellites permit American forces to attack weapons caches or clusters of fighters more precisely and with less risk to civilians than with ground fire, they say.

The air campaign's weapons of choice — 500-pound GBU-12 laser-guided bombs — are timed to detonate a split second after piercing a building's floor, imploding the structure and limiting the blast's effects. The Air Force has also dropped 1,000-pound and 2,000-pound laser-guided bombs, and Maverick missiles.

"Air power in Falluja has had the ability to come in overhead and hit targets precisely, and has allowed marines to stay out of lethal range," Lt. Gen. Walter E. Buchanan III, the senior American air commander in the Middle East, said in a telephone interview from Qatar.

To try to reduce risk to civilians, pilots use computer programs to figure out what kind of bomb, dropped at what angle, using which type of detonating device, will destroy a target with a minimum of what the military calls collateral damage.

"This urban thing is very complicated and requires much discipline," Gen. T. Michael Moseley, the Air Force vice chief of staff who directed the air campaign during the invasion, said in an interview on Thursday. "It's not something that you just shoot into a city. It is not carpet-bombing. It is not indiscriminate bombing. It is not just firing into an area. This is very hard to do."

Pilots work closely with spotters on the ground to identify targets. Spotters relay target coordinates or guide bombs to their destination with laser designators, a process that may take only minutes. But, commanders say, if bombing is needed near mosques, schools or hospitals, the spotters may be allowed hours.

"It requires the commander on the ground to determine the target and provide the positive identification of the target, the positive location of the target, and then to also do the assessment on the collateral damage — in other words, what unintended consequences would have by striking that particular target," said Maj. Gen. John F. Sattler, chief of operations for the United States Central Command.

This week's intensified airstrikes are still well below the 275 daily missions of a year ago. Excluding helicopters, the number of allied aircraft based around the Persian Gulf to support the invasion was about 750; today there are about 350.

But Navy and Air Force combat missions were on the increase across the country even before the latest spasm of violence. Those forces are now flying 55 to 60 combat flights over Iraq each day, more than double the number earlier this year. They are also flying 45 to 50 combat support missions a day, military officials said.

Ground commanders piece together intelligence from land and airborne sensors to help pinpoint enemy positions. RC-135 Rivet Joint planes sweep up electronic transmissions, including cellphone calls, to help identify insurgents' hideouts.

The Air Force has also sent about a dozen Rover laptop computers to Iraq, which allow ground spotters to receive live video feeds from Predators. A Global Hawk reconnaissance aircraft is to arrive next week.

American and British aircraft continue to patrol major supply routes, power lines and other critical installations.

"Most of our missions are about presence and working with ground forces," Capt. Alan Wesenberg, an F-15E pilot from Arvada, Colo., said in a telephone interview. "Most of the time we're looking for potential problems: vehicles pulled off the side of the road or a bridge knocked out."

None of the gunships' Special Operations aviators would discuss the Falluja mission, but some spoke of the AC-130's precision by recalling a mission last year in support of American ground forces closing with the Iraqi Army: The AC-130's surveillance equipment, which includes live feeds from Predators, allowed the crew to identify individuals.

"The good guys were closing in one side, and suddenly we saw Iraqis shooting their own guys in the back, trying to push them forward," said one pilot. "So we left those soldiers in front alone and I said, `Let's get the really bad guys.' We trained our firepower on them. We could see all that from above, and could separate the bad guys from the really bad guys."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armament; banglist; fallujah; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2004 9:28:05 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The AC-130H is a great tool to be used in Fullujah. They could easily be added to the MOAB and ARC Light options of the Fallujah Solution.
2 posted on 04/29/2004 9:31:33 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list; fourdeuce82d; Travis McGee; El Gato; Joe Brower; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
BANG
3 posted on 04/29/2004 9:32:10 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5; Ragtime Cowgirl
BANG
4 posted on 04/29/2004 9:41:35 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Okay, neat story-but hell, nothing a well trained 107mm crew couldn't accomplish...given a skilled FDC. *grin*
5 posted on 04/29/2004 9:51:00 PM PDT by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I was thinking of a MOAB demonstration just beyond the city's limits right after they ambushed and desecrated the contractors a few weeks ago. The bad PR from MOAB and B52s carpet bombing the city with dumb gravity bombs would outweigh the benefit, IMHO.
6 posted on 04/29/2004 9:51:47 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
This has got to be the most humane war ever waged.
7 posted on 04/29/2004 9:56:25 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I disagree...the Jihadists and those who support them would get the correct message and they would not do it again, particularly given the Black Jack Pershing methods applied at the end.

In addition, and perhaps of even more importance IMHO, it would preserve American lives. We do not need to go into that hellhole and take it block by block or neighborhood by neighborhood. That plays into the hands of those resisting and fighting us and the plan for freedom in Iraq...their Jihad culture.

The types of things we are doing now, negotiating and considering hiring an army headed by former Saddam Generals and some of the very people we are fighting there, comissioning them to do the job will be viewed as weakness and a stand down on our part...and will embolden more attacks.

Just my opinion.

8 posted on 04/29/2004 9:57:22 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"..The good guys were closing in one side, and suddenly we saw Iraqis shooting their own guys in the back, trying to push them forward,.."

That ought to be bad for morale!

9 posted on 04/29/2004 10:02:51 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Commanders say they go to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties,

I'd rather they go to great lengths to avoid American casualties.

10 posted on 04/29/2004 10:06:00 PM PDT by free2freep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free2freep
AMEN!

See the link in my post #2.

11 posted on 04/29/2004 10:13:26 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Commanders say they go to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties, but they acknowledge they do not know how many civilians have died in recent attacks. Pilots concede that in at least one case, an American warplane mistakenly bombed the wrong building in Falluja.


Ah, the NY Times....... they just don't understand.....maybe I can help.......IT'S A WAR!!!!!!
12 posted on 04/29/2004 11:02:42 PM PDT by Just Lori (I used to be a Democrat. Now, I'm an American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
But Falluja is not only a military target; it also holds incalculable symbolic power.

Ruh roh, NY times.......starting a sentence with the word "But". I thought this publication was staffed by the most intelligent literary minds in the country. So.....whar'djal goe too skool?
13 posted on 04/29/2004 11:05:24 PM PDT by Just Lori (I used to be a Democrat. Now, I'm an American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I say the Good PR of a MOAB would outweigh the bad PR.

Winning and Victory is the best PR
14 posted on 04/29/2004 11:12:06 PM PDT by TomasUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
Amen.
15 posted on 04/29/2004 11:22:36 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
The AC-130H is a great tool to be used in Fullujah. They could easily be added to the MOAB and ARC Light options of the Fallujah Solution.

The AC-130U is even better, and has better countermeasures against ground-to-air shoulder launched guided missiles, and is equipped with a 25mm GAU-12/U Gatling that allows it to fire from a greater elevation and slant range than the earlier versions that ysed twin M61 20mm guns instead..

Additionally, it's got superior sensors and night observation equipment and the onbard computers that let it perform a few of those gee-whiz targeting tricks described in the artticle above. Though there are only around 20 in the entire USAF inventory, it's a good bet that the success of the newest AC-130 family member, now radio callsign *Spooky* replacing *Specter,* will see more follow the first two batches built.

16 posted on 04/30/2004 12:08:10 AM PDT by archy (The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
all this with a politicians retreat
17 posted on 04/30/2004 12:10:47 AM PDT by RIGHT IN LAS VEGAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
Winning and Victory is the best PR

IMHO, I think it depends on how you define victory. Right now, the American home front reminds me of the early 1970s, and it looks like we have two tigers by the tail, i.e. Sunni Arabs and the restive, majority Shi'ites backed by Iran, looking to exploit any chance to obstruct our ends.

The goal of a democratic Iraq is unlikely with needless killing. We need to kill only the bad guys.

18 posted on 04/30/2004 12:11:47 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
This has got to be the most humane war ever waged.

I think that is one reason why it is so hard to win. Too much PC.

19 posted on 04/30/2004 12:21:13 AM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Why is the Navy involved in this?
Is there something here the Air Force can't handle?
Why go to the additional expense and risk of using
planes that operate from a ship in the gulf?
20 posted on 04/30/2004 12:27:43 AM PDT by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson