Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Specter-Toomey turnout low! Good Toomey News!
National Review / The Corner ^ | 4/27/04 | KJL

Posted on 04/27/2004 4:02:42 PM PDT by Josh in PA

STUFF FROM PA. [KJL] Most of this is cribbed from an email from a good, insidery source, with permission:

***Various sources in and around the Philadelphia suburbs report unusually low turnout. This is good news for Toomey, because the white-bread upper-middle class suburbs are the hot bed of squishy Republicanism.

***Broadly, polling sites have shown low turnout to this point. Poll officials outside of Harrisburg and north of Troy report low turnout. At one polling place outside of Troy, about 10 percent of registered Republicans had voted before 2 p.m. Low turnout statewide helps Toomey, because conservative Toomey backers are bound to show up, while Specter's backers will be more likely to decide something else is more worth their while.

***Weather so far has been good. Weather Channel, however, forecasts ugly weather, maybe rain or sleet in Philadelphia tonight. Doppler shows rain just hitting Philly. Rain may be spotty, rather than a big storm. Sleet hit Pittsburgh earlier today according to source in Allegheny Co.

***An exit poll in Lancaster Co. shows a slim lead for Toomey, 52-48. But this is very unscientific. It was of 113 voters at 23 polling places in the Co.

***A statewide conservative call-in show welcomed listeners to debate the race. Right away, they had Toomey callers. It took them 19 minutes to get a Specter backer on the air.

***Unscientific interviews show all late breakers going Toomey's way. This is promising for the 4-10 percent undecideds in most recent polls. Many pro-lifers are backing Specter because of Santorum's and Bush's endorsements, we also found.

***Specter had recorded phone calls going into central Pa. last night, with the voice of President Bush (likely from last Monday's rally in Pittsburgh) expressing his full support for Specter. Specter has spent his last $5 on get-out-the-vote efforts. The Philadelphia Inquirer carried the headline about the race above the fold on page A-1.

***A good source has spoken to folks at seven polling places. None of them had Specter workers present.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: election; pa; pennsylvania; senate; specter; spector; toomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 04/27/2004 4:02:42 PM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
Go Toomey!
2 posted on 04/27/2004 4:04:14 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
Man, I hope this is good info.
3 posted on 04/27/2004 4:04:29 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Vote Toomey April 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
Can PA pro-lifers be that gullible?
4 posted on 04/27/2004 4:04:57 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
Voted for Toomey as did two others in my family, hope he pulls this one off! Specter be GONE!
5 posted on 04/27/2004 4:05:29 PM PDT by MVV (Compassionate Conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
Keeping my fingers crossed!
Hit the road Arlen!
6 posted on 04/27/2004 4:07:01 PM PDT by ladyinred (Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Can PA pro-lifers be that gullible?

They voted for Rendell.

7 posted on 04/27/2004 4:07:31 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Vote Toomey April 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
Doesn't Specter have a better chance of beating the Dem challenger in November? If we lose Specter's seat to the Dems we are risking losing our senate majority! And don't tell me that Specter always voted with the Dems anyway, It;'s better to have a Republican voting with the Dems than a Dem voting with the Dems. There are distinct proceduaral advantages to a Repub majoirty in the Senate that go above and beyond winning this or that vote.
8 posted on 04/27/2004 4:09:48 PM PDT by Patriot62 (http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2001858220.jpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
How come Bush is supporting Spector when he votes against Bush's judge appointments?
9 posted on 04/27/2004 4:10:09 PM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
"Can PA pro-lifers be that gullible?

The same thing can be said of that state's gun owners. How long has Spector been in the Senate? There's your answer. For that matter how stoopid can the electorate from South Dakota be to keep giving little tommy daschle HIS salary term after term when he keeps trying to erode their rights?

10 posted on 04/27/2004 4:10:29 PM PDT by ExSoldier (When the going gets tough, the tough go cyclic. (R.I.P. harpseal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
That was the margin?
11 posted on 04/27/2004 4:10:33 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
Do you think maybe a lot of Specter's supporters don't know he's in trouble, or are simply more apathetic than Toomey's voters? I hardly hear about a groundswell for Specter, but with Toomey, it's signs, rallies, you name it. Specter's voters must be invisible.
12 posted on 04/27/2004 4:11:07 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Here's how to solve Christianity vs paganism: have Bibleman vs. Captain Planet in a steel cage match)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
When "pro-lifers" are dmentioned in political discussions, it usually refers to "one-issue" candidates...Lok, here in NY we have the Conservative Party and the Right-toLife Party, f' pete's sake.....go figure that one out..I can't...that's why I was questioning the statement in the article...regards..
13 posted on 04/27/2004 4:12:47 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Can PA pro-lifers be that gullible?

What does that mean?

14 posted on 04/27/2004 4:13:06 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Rendell's pro abort. A lot of Santorum Dems went for him. Of course, the pro-abort pubbies also went for him but they knew what they were getting.

A lot of gun owners went for him, thinking he was much more conservative than he is. Rendell is a good pol, I'll give him that.

15 posted on 04/27/2004 4:13:14 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Vote Toomey April 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks
How come Bush is supporting Spector when he votes against Bush's judge appointments?

Because Toomey (in theory) will have a much harder time winning the general election than Arlen the RINO.

16 posted on 04/27/2004 4:14:34 PM PDT by Fzob (Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Patriot62
We already have the House, Senate and Presidency. We're still heading toward destruction. They want the USA destroyed.
17 posted on 04/27/2004 4:14:43 PM PDT by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
See my #13, in response to the line in the article...
18 posted on 04/27/2004 4:15:17 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks
How come Bush is supporting Spector when he votes against Bush's judge appointments?


Curious... which ones has he voted against?
19 posted on 04/27/2004 4:15:33 PM PDT by deport (To a dog all roads lead home.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Rendell has that John Gotti charm. In every sense of that comparison. Also, Rendell campaigned almost exclusively on cutting the property tax.
20 posted on 04/27/2004 4:17:37 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson