Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gorelick Memo Declassified (Graphics of 4 page document)
National Review PDF ^ | April 13, 2004

Posted on 04/13/2004 1:50:29 PM PDT by TomGuy

Graphics of the Gorelick memo


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911commission; aschcrofttestimony; ashcroft; clintonoid; declassified; gorelick; gorelicker; headonaplatter; johnashcroft; klintonistafraud; memo; roadkill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last
To: Howlin
Another goofy looking Clinton woman

(not that were paying any attention to that)
81 posted on 04/13/2004 4:40:46 PM PDT by woofie ( 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

Did any of the Alphabet Newtworks mention this memo?
82 posted on 04/13/2004 4:40:54 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I sent an e-mail to the above posted spot and also cc: president bush @whitehouse.gov for good measure! I was LIVID and let them know what a circus this commission is with her on it!
83 posted on 04/13/2004 4:41:30 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I was at work when I saw this mentioned on the live thread. When I read Ashcroft's opening testimony it was like someone threw icewater directly into my stomach. I can hardly believe this.
84 posted on 04/13/2004 4:47:22 PM PDT by McGavin999 (Evil thrives when good men do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
She never said one word about this. All the while asking people why they didn't "do more."

Bitch.
85 posted on 04/13/2004 4:49:52 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
The text of the memo for anyone that wants a savable copy--only did a quick spellcheck and did not include titles of the recipients:

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary Jo White, Louis Freeh, Richard Scruggs and Jo Ann Harris

FROM: Jamie S. Gorelick, Deputy AG

RE: Instructions on Separation of Certain Foreign Counterintelligence and Criminal Investigations

The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI have been conducting criminal investigations of certain terrorist acts, including the bombing of the World Trade center, and potential obstruction of the indicted case of United States v. Rahman. et al. During the course of these investigations significant counterintelligence information has been developed related to the activities and plans of agents of foreign powers operating in this country and overseas, including previously unknown connections between separate terrorist groups. Although information and evidence relevant to possible future criminal prosecutions is still being sought, it has become overwhelmingly apparent that there is a compelling need to further develop and expand that foreign counterintelligence information. Consequently, the FBI has initiated a separate full field counterintelligence investigation.

Although the counterintelligence investigation may result in the incidental collection of information relevant to possible future criminal prosecutions, the primary purpose of the counter
intelligence investigation will be to collect foreign counterintelligence informatics. Because the counterintelligence investigation will involve the use of surveillance techniques authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) against targets that, in acre instances, had been subject to surveillance under Title III, and because it will involve acme of the same sources and targets an the criminal investigation, we believe that it is prudent to establish a act of instructions that will clearly separate the counterintelligence investigation from the mere limited, but continued, criminal investigations. These procedures, which go beyond what is legally required, will prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation.

(1) The focus of the Foreign Counterintelligence (FCI) investigation will be on preventing future terrorist acts and obtaining foreign counterintelligence information about the individuals and groups encaging in, or preparing to engage in. terrorist activities in the United States and abroad.

(2) The criminal investigations will focus on the indicted cases of United States v. Yousef, et al. and United States v. Rahman, et al., and the potential obstruction of the Rahman case. The criminal investigations will also focus on the conspiracy to bomb United States airlines recently uncovered in the Philippines and the bombing of a Philippine airliner.

(3) No "pro-active" investigative efforts or technical coverages are presently contemplated in any of the ongoing criminal investigations, which primarily focus on past criminal conduct, with the exception of the obstruction investigation. If in the future, the criminal investigations develop information requiring "pro-active" efforts or technical coverages, the United States Attorneys Office (USAO) and the criminal agents will consult with the office of Intelligence Policy and Review (OIPR), and the FCI agents before undertaking such efforts, absent exigent circumstances, in order to determine the impact, if any, an the FCI investigation.

(4) The subjects, who are presently under pen register surveillance in the criminal investigation, will be investigated as FCI subjects under the FCI guidelines using all available techniques, including FISA. without any direction or control by the USAO, Southern District of New York or the criminal Division, Department of Justice. 'The current pen registers will be discontinued before any F1SA-authorized surveillances are initiated.

(5) FBI memoranda and investigative reports including 302's from (redacted) will be prepared as follows: cases and investigations, including the obstruction case will be segregated into separate reports which will be provided to the USAO, OIPR, and the Criminal Division. All foreign counterintelligence information (including all foreign counterintelligence relating to future terrorist activities) will be in classified reports which will be provided to OIPR, but will not be provided either to the criminal agents, the USAO, or the Criminal Division, without Federal Bureau of investigation Headquarters and OIPR concurrence. The FBI agent responsible for handling the will remain Involved In the on-going trial of United States v. Rahman, but will otherwise be assigned to the foreign counterintelligence investigation and report to foreign counterintelligence supervisors.

(6) Foreign counterintelligence collected during the course of the FCI investigation will be disseminated pursuant to FBI guidelines and FISA. If, in the case of the FCI investigation, facts or circumstances are developed that reasonably Indicate that a significant federal crime has been, is being, or may be committed, the FBI and OIPA are each independently responsible for notifying the USAO and the Criminal Division. Notice shall include the facts and circumstances developed during the FCI investigation that supplied the indication of significant federal criminal activity, whether or not such activity relates to the indicted cases or criminal investigations referred to in subparagraph (2) above. An Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) from the Southern District of New York who has knowledge of, but no active involvement in, the on-going criminal investigations, will continue to be assigned to work with OIFR and the FCI agents to review such foreign intel1igence information to ensure that evidence that might be exculpatory to any defendants currently under indictment is promptly considered for dissemination to criminal investigative personnel. the CSAO, and the Criminal Division. This AUSA will also serve to ensure, in conjunction with the FBI and OIPR, that information which reasonably Indicates chat a significant federal crime has been, is being, or may be committed Is appropriately disseminated to criminal investigative personnel, the USAO, and the Criminal Division pursuant to the procedures set forth above. That AUSA will continue to be"walled off" from participation in the on-going criminal investigations and cases and will continue to abide by all FISA dissemination provisions and guidelines.

86 posted on 04/13/2004 4:52:00 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
"Jamie Gorelick, who REFUSED to take Former FBI Director Louis Freeh's recommendation now Judges what happened. Isn't that special?" Political business as usual for the dnc and the democrat criminal enterprise party. Nothing special, to be sure, and the alphabet networks will move past it quickly to focus upon whatever their bosses at the dnc tell them to focus upon. If this truth regarding Gorelick and her henchfobs BenVeniste, Roemer, and Kerrey, is to reach the American people, it will have to come through the free internet, because we all know the liberal pukes at the alphabet soup media won't portray it fully or truthfully. America is in deep trouble because of democrats and now we are in even deeper potential trouble because the democrats can focus upon nothing but their lust for power at the cost of American lives ... and I do include our Soldiers' lives in that, due to the Kerry and Kennedy aiding and abetting the Islamicists world-wide through their sleazy false characterizations which encourage more Islamofacists' terrorism not less. But liberal democrats are such loving folk ... as proven with the Florida ad to put Rummy against a wall and pull the trigger.
87 posted on 04/13/2004 4:52:08 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Read Later BUMP!
88 posted on 04/13/2004 4:56:24 PM PDT by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is (still ) a Smug and Holier- than- Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
bump
89 posted on 04/13/2004 5:01:58 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Arlen Specter supports the International Crime Court having jurisdiction over US soldiers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toespi
My gut says to cause exactly this sort of problem. Watch and see the Democrats and the Partisan Media turn this into "Bush attacks Clinton administration to shield himself from a critical report".

Just like Memogate, the story will be the fact that Ashcroft dropped the dime on her, rather than the fact she was part of the problem.

90 posted on 04/13/2004 5:04:28 PM PDT by PogySailor (Proud member of the RAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PogySailor
From Ashcroft's opening remarks :"When they most needed clear, understandable guidance, our agents and operatives were given the language of lawyers. Even if they could have penetrated Bin Laden's training camps, they would have needed a battery of attorneys to approve the capture. With unclear guidance, our covert action team's risk of injury may have exceeded the risk to Usama Bin Laden."

Jamie Gore Lick's memo posted herein is the sum and substance of that gordian knot, created I believe to give clinton-gore the ability to feather ANYTHING from public scrutiny that might impact their re-elections.

91 posted on 04/13/2004 5:07:26 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

Also from Mister Ashcroft's opening remarks (and you will not get this plain talk from the media whores for ther dnc): "After the FBI arrested Moussaoui, agents became suspicious of his interest in commercial aircraft and sought approval for a criminal warrant to search his computer. The warrant was rejected because FBI officials feared breaching the wall." Gore Lick's wall, written no doubt while ensconced on her 'clinton kneepads'.
92 posted on 04/13/2004 5:11:02 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

Also from Mister Ashcroft's opening remarks (and you will not get this plain talk from the media whores for the dnc): "After the FBI arrested Moussaoui, agents became suspicious of his interest in commercial aircraft and sought approval for a criminal warrant to search his computer. The warrant was rejected because FBI officials feared breaching the wall." Gore Lick's wall, written no doubt while ensconced on her 'clinton kneepads'.
93 posted on 04/13/2004 5:11:27 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

I'm double posting ... can ya tell I'm mad as hell?
94 posted on 04/13/2004 5:12:11 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
LOL! There are a lot of us feeling that way. When I heard Ashcroft tell about the Gorelick memo today, my blood pressure spiked.
95 posted on 04/13/2004 5:16:49 PM PDT by PogySailor (Proud member of the RAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
That's what has me so pissed off. She should never have accepted the position on the commission. It is a prime example of their total lack of ethics.
96 posted on 04/13/2004 5:17:08 PM PDT by McGavin999 (Evil thrives when good men do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Do we have an actual date in 1995 for this memo? I don't see it.
97 posted on 04/13/2004 5:18:37 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
it's beyond a conflict of interest...

What comes after conflict of interest, obstruction of justice?

-PJ

98 posted on 04/13/2004 5:19:47 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
What comes after conflict of interest, obstruction of justice?

I'm not sure, but "bitchiness" is sandwiched in there somewhere.

99 posted on 04/13/2004 5:22:41 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
Ping
100 posted on 04/13/2004 5:22:49 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson