Posted on 04/07/2004 8:09:30 AM PDT by Fedora
Today I noticed that Condoleezza Rice was being criticized by Leslie Gelb:
Friends, Foes Say Rice Has Spirit, Toughness She'll Need for Sept. 11 Testimony
At the same time, Leslie Gelb, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, who has known Rice for two decades, says he has seen a stiffening in her philosophical approach over the years.
Gelb's name rang a bell, and upon searching I discovered Gelb was responsible for hiring Richard Clarke to the State Department:
Clarke Known As Abrasive but Efficient
Leslie Gelb, who hired Clarke for his first State Department job in 1979
Now Gelb has also been involved in several major national security leaks, including the Pentagon Papers:
The Pentagon Papers and Their Continuing Significance
Amid his own growing doubts about the war he had encouraged, McNamara quietly left the government in early 1968. Before doing so, however, he ordered a small staff in the Department of Defense to undertake a secret study of U.S. decision-making about Vietnam since the end of the Second World War. The study was directed by Leslie Gelb.
About nine months into the [Pentagon Papers] project, Daniel Ellsberg of the Rand Corporation climbed aboard. Even though Ellsberg behaved erratically throughout and failed to meet deadlines, Gelb and [Paul C.] Warnke agreed to give him "personal access to the entire study."
Powell, 53:
On May 16, while testifying before the United States Senate, Ellsberg, before taking the oath, stated that Warnke, Halperin and Gelb were not involved in his theft of the Papers. No one had asked him that question. . .but later, after Sen. Strom Thurmond insisted that he be put under oath, he did not discuss this matter.
Powell, 90:
On February 14, 1985, Leslie Gelb broke a front-page story in the New York Times titled "U.S. tries to Fight Allied Resistance to Nuclear Arms." In it, Gelb revealed that the United States had drawn up plans to deploy nuclear depth charges in Canada, Iceland, Bermuda, Puerto Rico, the Azores, the Philippines, Spain, and Diego Garcia in time of war. Gelb's source for this classified information? The Institute for Policy Studies. . .These stories struck a raw nerve in the alliance. . .and subsequently led to the demise of the ANZUS alliance.
Powell, 103:
. . .Leslie Gelb, of the New York Times, described the institute [the Institute for Policy Studies] as "one of the premiere centers for foreign policy perspectives."
Further searching reveals that Gelb began his political career working for antiwar Senator Jacob Javits, whom was considered for invitation by event organizers to the VVAW's Dewey Canyon III rally:
Director of Policy Planning and Arms Control for International Security Affairs, Department of Defense (1967-69); Executive Assistant, U.S. Senator Jacob K. Javits (1966-67)
During the 1970s, one of Javits' major concerns was the question of who has the power to make war. He was the first member of Congress to propose legislation reestablishing congressional (rather than presidential) responsibility to commit U.S. armed forces abroad in the absence of a formal declaration of war. This War Powers Resolution passed the Senate in April 1972 and again in July 1973. It became law over President Nixon's veto on November 7, 1973.
This week in history 25 years ago--February 21, 1971: Stalinists push "People's Peace Treaty"
Both the Stalinists and the ex-Trotskyists of the Socialist Workers Party proposed that big business politicians such as Democratic Senator George McGovern and Republican Senator Jacob Javits should be invited to speak at the antiwar demonstration set for April 24 in Washington, DC.
Douglas Brinkley, Tour of Duty : John Kerry and the Vietnam War, 361
Just as the VVAW members were arriving in the capital, New York Senator Jacob Javits held a private dinner at his home where Secretary of State Melvin Laird was the guest of honor. It was a carefully staged event. Javits had eight other Republican members of the House and the Senate also stop by. AFter dinner. . .Pennsylvania Senator Hugh Scott dropped the gauntlet. "You don't see any hawks around here," he told Laird in a non-nonsense fashion. "The hawks are all ex-hawks. There's a feeling that the Senate ought to tell the President to get the hell out of the War."
So Richard Clarke was hired by Leslie Gelb, an individual involved in the Penagon Papers leak, who in turn started his political career working for Jacob Javits, an ally of the VVAW. Interesting, no?
Thanks!
Speaking of bedtime, that's probably about it for me today--will catch up on any more posts tomorrow.
Gelb, Ellsberg, Warnke, Ramsey Clark & Anthony Lake are on the list.
His [Soros] campaign began last summer with the help of Morton H. Halperin, a liberal think tank veteran. Soros invited Democratic strategists to his house in Southampton, Long Island, including Clinton chief of staff John D. Podesta, Jeremy Rosner, Robert Boorstin and Carl Pope.
They discussed the coming election. Standing on the back deck, the evening sun angling into their eyes, Soros took aside Steve Rosenthal, CEO of the liberal activist group America Coming Together (ACT), and Ellen Malcolm, its president. They were proposing to mobilize voters in 17 battleground states. Soros told them he would give ACT $10 million.
Before coffee the next morning, his friend Peter Lewis, chairman of the Progressive Corp., had pledged $10 million to ACT. Rob Glaser, founder and CEO of RealNetworks, promised $2 million. Rob McKay, president of the McKay Family Foundation, gave $1 million and benefactors Lewis and Dorothy Cullman committed $500,000.
Soros also promised up to $3 million to Podesta's new think tank, the Center for American Progress.
After an April dinner at his Manhattan apartment to discuss Mr. Podesta's project, Mr. Soros pulled aside two senior aides, Morton H. Halperin, a former Clinton aide who directs Mr. Soros's Washington-based Open Society Institute, and Michael Vachon, a personal assistant who is overseeing Mr. Soros's political projects.
To ensure an unbiased assessment, he hired two separate political teams to evaluate Mr. Bush's strengths and weaknesses, the tactics needed to beat him and how much it would cost. Heading one team was Tom Novick, a former Oregon state legislator who had recently done a report concluding that voter mobilization was a better investment than last-minute television ads. The second group was lead by Mark Steitz, a Washington-based political analyst who had done a similar assessment of President George H.W. Bush's 1992 re-election chances for some wealthy Democratic donors. Mr. Soros then set out to diversify his political investment. On Sept. 17, Wes Boyd, the California-based founder of MoveOn.org, a liberal online organization founded during the Clinton impeachment trial, arrived in New York for what he thought would be a get-acquainted session with Mr. Soros.
Also found, curiously enough an FR link concerning the memo that just happened to be found at Starbucks and handed over to Podesta that lists:
Personnel
Morton H. Halperin, senior vice president of the Center for American Progress. Halperin is also Director Open Society Institute and Open Society Policy Center [1]
Contact
Center for American Progress
805 15th St. NW
Suite 400
Washington DC 20005
202-682-1611
email:progress@amprog.org
Web: http://www.centerforamericanprogress.org
BTW, I found yet another Watergate connection to the 9-11 Commission:
Fred F. Fielding
Legends in the Law: A Conversation with Fred F. Fielding
TWL: In 1970 you came down to Washington to work in the White House as an assistant to John Dean, who later became known for his role in the coverup of the Watergate matter and for testifying against the Nixon administration. What led you to apply to work in President Nixon’s counsel’s office with John Dean?
FFF: “Apply” is not quite the right word. It was known in Washington circles that the White House was looking for an attorney to work with Dean as his chief deputy. The large D.C. law firms all had candidates. The partners at Morgan, Lewis did not think that they had a suitable candidate in their Washington office, so they recommended me from Philadelphia. I came down for an interview and got the job. In hindsight, I was probably perfect because John Dean was a “Washington” lawyer, and I had no Washington experience. I was a litigator, but I was not a threat to him in political circles.
[SNIP]
TWL: Dean described what the two of you did as building the “law firm in the White House.” Was that a good description?
FFF: It was. We tried to get as many clients as we could and handle as many different problems as we could. We were willing to act as attorneys for anybody who worked for the White House. We even counseled staff people on divorce issues and 10 Filipino stewards on their immigration status. We also broke new ground. It sounds odd to say this now, but at that time there was no clearance process for presidential appointees who needed Senate confirmation. We devised questionnaires and set up a system, which is the system now in place with some evolution.
TWL: The Committee to Re-Elect the President authorized the break-in of the Watergate apartments where the Democratic party had offices—an action that ultimately led to the resignation of President Nixon. Did Dean consider you for the position of general counsel to the Committee to Re-Elect the President?
FFF: I learned afterward in Dean’s testimony that the committee had asked him to give me up to be its general counsel. But Dean declined, saying that he needed me to run his office. The position went to G. Gordon Liddy, who is currently famous as a right-wing talk show host, and who had a notoriously cavalier attitude toward the law.
[SNIP]
TWL: Were you the person who told Dean about the Watergate break-in?
FFF: Yes, I told him of the news accounts that the break-in had occurred when he called me from the Philippines. I did not know what it portended, but he said he was coming right back and seemed very concerned. In hindsight, I guess he was!
TWL: Afterward you two went through Howard Hunt’s safe, the contents of which became infamous because of all the details of “dirty tricks” operations contained there. Were you surprised at the things you found in there?
FFF: I sure was. At that point we were trying to find out as much as we could about Mr. Hunt. I did not even know who Howard Hunt was, but we discovered that he had a safe in the White House basement. We went through the safe to see what was in there. There were a lot of things, including a gun.
[SNIP]
TWL: Is it true that Dean would sometimes use your house when he was being staked out by the press?
FFF: My town house in Old Town, Alexandria, was at the corner of Queen and Union Street across the street from Founders Park. Dean had the corner town house right behind my house at Quay and Union. There were wooden fences and an alley between us. When the press was staking Dean out, the whole Founders Park would be full of press, sitting around, smoking, throwing footballs around. The thing that amazed me was the reporters could never figure out how John got in and out of his house. They never caught on that he would come to my house and walk through.
[SNIP]
TWL: Are you still friendly with Dean?
FFF: He still calls me on the phone from time to time. John Dean was fired and later ended up spending some time in prison for his role in Watergate.
Was Fred Fielding Deep Throat?
The beauty of the Fred Fielding theory is that it can accommodate the most forceful part of Mann's argument—that Deep Throat, whoever he was, had ready access to FBI files. Both Dean and Fielding (who was Dean's deputy) did have an appallingly vast knowledge of what the FBI knew, and Gaines' class has painstakingly matched records from the Nixon White House showing that Dean and Fielding knew about particular incidents with passages in All the President's Men in which Deep Throat tips off Woodward about those same incidents. "I think they really have added new information," says Ron Rosenbaum, who during the period of Watergate revelations wrote a Village Voice column titled "Wallowing in Watergate." Gaines and Co. also found intriguing evidence suggesting that Woodward and Bernstein strained to keep Fielding out of their Post stories, which is just how one would pamper a highly valuable source. And it's hard to dismiss the stated opinion of H.R. Haldeman—who was in an excellent position to know—that Fielding was Deep Throat.
Let me mention that I'm not claiming one way or the other whether Fielding was Deep Throat--I haven't made up my mind on that issue yet. However, whether or not he was Deep Throat, his connection to Watergate and to John Dean in particular is noteworthy in relation to what we're discussing.
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States: Commission Members
Thomas H. Kean, Chair: Thomas Kean, chair, is former governor of New Jersey (1982-1990) and, since 1990, the president of Drew University.
Homeland Security Project: About TCF
The Homeland Security Project is guided by a coordinating committee co-chaired by Tom Kean, the former New Jersey governor and current Drew University president, and Richard Celeste, the former Ohio governor and ambassador to India and current Colorado College president. The coordinating committee will develop recommendations arising from analysis produced by expert working groups focusing on four topics: The federal response, including an exploration of the design and function of the Office of Homeland security; federal-state coordination; the challenge of media coverage and public information disclosure by government officials regarding homeland security stories; and immigration and national security.
About TCF: The Century Foundation
The Century Foundation was founded in 1919 and endowed by Edward Filene. Throughout most of the last century, the foundation was known as the Twentieth Century Fund.
Homeland Security Project: About Us: Coordinating Committee Members JOHN D. PODESTA: Professor, Georgetown University Law Center; former White House Chief of Staff
The weak point is the extreme right or left support thread... not the topmost in the middle but always one of the extremes. Pluck either one, and the web folds over on itself, ensnaring the spider as well as rendering the web very obvious and unworkable.
You could write a book (under a fake name, of course) when this whole charade is over.
Outstanding.
Thanks! :) I did start writing some articles once, but I found there was so much information it was hard to cover in one place without getting too complicated to follow. I'm still trying to figure out how to present it in an organized way.
Have you thought about doing some sort of flow chart or timeline so people can see the pieces and how they fit together? The cancer that is the DemocRAT party certainly runs deep. I wonder if it is operable?
I've considered using visual aids like that, and I think that's probably the best way to go. I have some notes where I've started organizing the data into sociological categories (infiltration of academia, think tanks, media, government, labor, corporate, religious groups, etc.). I guess I'd need to convert that into a database format and then I could generate some graphs and charts from that, maybe. Also I'd need to pick which categories are most significant to emphasize, since there are so many. So far I've been focusing on connections to to the apparatus Alger Hiss belonged to, which is how I've been organizing my research up to now. There's probably a number of ways to do it, though, depending on what's emphasized--need to think about this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.