Posted on 04/05/2004 9:23:56 PM PDT by Quick1
When you ban a desired commodity, you drive up its price, which gives its producers money to bribe law enforcement. Corruption is an inevitable effect of such bans.
If a hot babe showed up at my door with only a g-string, I think butt-kicking would be the last thing on my mind. Well, maybe the kicking I'd get by the wife if I stared too long.
Perhaps that is because you have no idea what is moral. You have lost the ability to judge the smallest of things.
An absurd question has stymied the Church. Should Christians judge?
Of course believers should judge. To not judge is to be indecent, not to mention inhuman. The only kingdom in which there is no judging is the plant kingdom. For of living things, vegetables do not judge. In the animal kingdom, though, judgment is a must, and members of the Kingdom of God must do the most judging.
Jesus repeatedly taught men to judge rightly, insisting they "judge with righteous judgment" (John 7:24) and He praised a man who "rightly judged" (Luke 7:43). Paul shamed the Corinthian Christians because there was no one among them willing to "judge the smallest matters" (1 Cor. 6:2). As the Apostle wrote, "He who is spiritual judges all things" for "we have the mind of Christ" (1Cor. 2:15-16). The notion that judgment is wrong is a ludicrous one. Should child-molesters escape condemnation? Should rapists be free from criticism? Should society refrain from judging those arrested for murder? Should we call evil good? Or would that be a judgment too?
"Judge not" is the prayer of those who want to hide light under a basket. The cliché describes salt which has lost its flavor, which no longer seasons or preserves. Those seduced by this terrible lie are taken out of the game. As spectators on the sidelines, they only watch the spiritual battle. But they are in a comfort zone. Apathy is the craving. "Judge not" is the mantra for shirking responsibility.
A lie paralyzed the Church. To abhor evil, someone must first judge evil. God instructs men against "hypocrisy" commanding them to "abhor what is evil" (Rom. 12:9). Thus, unable to judge, and unaccustomed to abhorrence, Christians en masse become hypocrites when they obey the Hypocrites Golden Rule. For "judge not" (Mat. 7:1-5) is simply a hypocrites application of do unto others as you would have them do unto you (Mat. 7:12). "For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged" (Mat. 7:2). Judge others as you would have them do unto you inverted is Judge not if you do not want to be judged. Therefore the hypocrite does not judge. As Jesus said, "Judge not… you hypocrite" (Mat. 7:1, 5 KJV; Ezek. 16:52).
Christ kept this theme throughout His ministry. "Hypocrites," Jesus said, "why, even of yourselves, do you not judge what is right?" (Luke 12:56-57). Still, His own followers have mostly ignored the Lord’s harsh rebuke: "Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck out of your brother’s eye" (Mat. 7:5). "Judge Not" is the Hypocritical Oath.
"Judge Not" is hypocrite haven. He who lives in a glass house should not throw stones. Such Christians, though, should relocate. Move into "the temple of the great God, which is being built with heavy stones" (Ezra 5:8). Christians live in the "building" for which Christ is "the chief corner stone" (Eph. 2:20). And if that Stone falls on someone it "will grind him to powder" (Mat. 21:44; Luke 20:18; cf. Ex. 32:20). It is better to be judged by a Christian than crushed by Christ.
Scripture deals with topics which range from simple to advanced truth. There is the milk which is for babes in Christ, but the meat is for men of God. The question of whether or not Christians should judge is milk. It is preschool. The newest believer discipled with any of a hundred passages would immediately understand that he must judge. Judging others is fundamental. It is not a difficult concept and should in no way be controversial. "Everyone who partakes only in milk is unskilled in the Word of righteousness, for he is a babe" (Heb. 5:13). The Church today, however, has trouble even with milk. Extreme ignorance of the Bible has crippled the Church. And that crippling is obvious in virtually every denomination, and in almost all local fellowships. What is the percentage of Christians who have succumbed to the "Judge not" deception? Is there even one percent of believers who have not fallen for that diversion? Surely it seems that at least 99 out of 100 are guilty of either not rebuking someone for misquoting Jesus, or of repeating the mindless "Judge not" themselves. Believers need to turn from this sin and ask God for wisdom to keep from being so easily deceived again.
Curse God and die!
Is that good advice? Word for word, it is in the Bible. Job’s wife counsels her husband to "Curse God and die" (Job 2:7). Many verses, if ripped out of context, can ruin lives. Judas "went and hanged himself" (Mat. 27:5) and as Jesus said "Go and do likewise" (Luke 10:37). The believer who lacks a hunger for God’s word is susceptible to the most absurd dangers.
br> Are members of the Body of Christ today less capable than Israel whom God commanded to "judge righteously" (Deut. 1:16-17; Lev. 19:15)? Moses appointed the head of one out of every ten households as a judge (Ex. 18:25; Deut. 1:15). Should Christians look down upon the entire book of Judges? Should America eliminate all judges, or should just the Christian judges resign? Should believers ignore Paul’s admonition? For he wrote:
"Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world will be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Do you not know that we shall judge angels? How much more, things that pertain to this life? I say this to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you, not even one, who will be able to judge between his brethren?" (1Cor. 6:2-5).
Notice that Christians "will judge the world!" (1 Cor. 6:2). For Paul said, "if the world will be judged by you…" God is the Judge of all the world who will delegate that judgment to His people. Even spirit beings will submit to believers: "Do you not know that we shall judge angels?" Then and now, believers should "judge... according to My judgments" (Ezek. 44:24) as God said. The Almighty commits judgment into the hands of His obedient servants (Rev. 20:4, 1 Tim. 5:24). This teaching is ancient for as Enoch, the seventh from Adam, said, "the Lord comes with ten thousands of His saints to execute judgment on all" (Jude 14-15).
Jesus too said, "The men of Nineveh will rise in the judgment with this generation and condemn it..." (Mat. 12:41). And as Solomon wrote, "jealously is a husband's fury; therefore, he will not spare [the adulterer] in the day of vengeance. He will accept no recompense nor will he be appeased..." (Prov. 6:34-35). God gives the responsibility for vengeance, condemnation and judgment to His servants for "every tongue which rises against you in judgment you shall condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord…" (Isa. 54:17).
Today, many believers are effectively saying, "Lord, thanks but no thanks. I’ll pass on that judgment stuff." But Paul responds, "Start judging now, because you will need the practice" (1Cor. 6:2-5). Remember, "he who is spiritual judges all things. For... we have the mind of Christ" (1 Cor. 2:15-16). And God will reward those who judge, and do the hard work: "Those who rebuke the wicked will have delight, and a good blessing will come upon them." (Prov. 24:25).
Jesus said, "Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment" (John 7:24). Like Don Quixote tilting at windmills, though, Christians battle an enemy that means them no harm, their inclination to judge. Hopefully the Church will see Judge Not headed for retirement replaced with Judge Rightly.
Not if it was done right and the same for drugs. Again let us look to the Bible and see where we have gone wrong.
"So you shall put away the evil from Israel. And all the people shall hear and fear, and no longer act presumptuously." Deut. 17:12-13
Yet, any penalty executed through American courts is not much of a deterrent. Wise King Solomon 2,900 years ago explained why this is so:
Because the sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil. Eccl. 8:11
When a murderer/drug dealer/pornster is executed/sentensed, three appeals and 12 years after his crime, society has largely forgotten about him. His death/prison sentence has almost no deterrent effect on crime. Further, a life sentence cannot be executed speedily. The swift harsh penalty deters crime.
Put a few porn people in jail, swiftly publically hang a drug pusher, line up a row of child molester and shoot them dead, that will be a deterrent. Anything less is a joke.
Let me use a prosaic and often experiencd example. Traffic court. Is speeding evil? No. Risky and careless operation of a motor vehicle is, however, an evil. The evil of endangerment, or endangering others, or even of engaging in an activity in such a way to cause others to reasonably believe they are endangered.
Traffic court, as usually found to be currently practised does NOT encourage safety, and is the founding of many people's disrespect for the law. Why? Because the local Judges often presume guilt, and enforce a badly constructed law -- speeding, that is. Speeding, alone, is NOT a sufficient indicator of unsafe or reckless operation. That is clear to all.
Speeding is not an evil. If Judges were more careful with and respectful of both Law and Person, they would care to ascertain the circumstance of each speeding violation. Does the circumstance suggest unsafe or careless operation?
And the Legislators would be careful -- if the Judges were not in the practise of ascertaining bad, evil, actions in addition to the report of an over-limit speed -- the legistlators should care to make "reckless, unsafe operation" a requirement to find fault.
Since we nearly all are expert, or at least well-capable, drivers we all have a strong and common sense of what unsafe and reckless operation of a motor vehicle is. Every day -- while driving -- we apply that highly refined and developed judgement. There are few things we do better, really, than drive. There are individual and rare occassioned exceptions, of course, but given any number of juries of American adults, or of any number of mature and sane Judges -- when presented the same facts and traffic cicumstances of a violation would all reasonably be assumed to make the same determination as to being endangering or not.
We have the ability to use discernment and judgment regarding traffic violations -- of crimes of the road.
Yet such discretion and respect is NOT the way it is. We, in our society today, accept easy proofs of crime. We confuse violations of some rudely constructed regulation with evil, with crime.
Too easily accept them. Crimes SHOULD include some indication of obvious evil action to be crimes, or even of misdemeanors.
Our standards are too low. We judge too rashly.
We are far from being able to judge, to measure, blasphemy, being too perplexed in matters spiritual. Yet we can judge "fighting words", for we are adept at nuances of inter-personal expression among groups and individuals.
Perhaps that is because you have no idea what is moral. You have lost the ability to judge
Wrong. A key word in my statement is "enforcing," a concept that is addressed nowhere in your lengthy cut-and-paste. Care to try again?
Did you read post 477? It most certainly address "enforcing". Care to read again?
We can speed things up in one of two ways: multiply the size, and therefore the cost, of the court system manyfold; or do away with many of the procedural safeguards against punishing the innocent and protecting the Constitutional rights of the accused.
Which do you advocate?
If porn is coming into my neighbor's house that impacts directly on me and my children.
Did you read my reply to it in post 482?
Please elucidate the nature of this "direct" impact. It's not clear how anything (short of explosions) going on in your neighbor's house can possibly "directly" impact on you.
Back in my post #410, I asked you to define "porn." I'm still waiting for an answer.
It would go underground and become much more scarce.
And internet porn originating in foreign countries would quickly take its place, wouldn't it?
This is the sick thing about it all, the Fedguv involvement. It would be all in order if every single state of its own accord chose to ban all porn. But the Feds are bent on leaning ever harder on the courts to ramp up the judicial activism against what is already a swiss cheesed Constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.