Skip to comments.
U.S. declares War on Porn
Baltimore Sun ^
| April 5, 2004
| Laura Sullivan
Posted on 04/05/2004 9:23:56 PM PDT by Quick1
WASHINGTON -- Lam Nguyen's job is to sit for hours in a chilly, quiet room devoid of any color but gray and look at pornography. This job, which Nguyen does earnestly from 9 to 5, surrounded by a half-dozen other "computer forensic specialists" like him, has become the focal point of the Justice Department's operation to rid the world of porn.
In this field office in Washington, 32 prosecutors, investigators and a handful of FBI agents are spending millions of dollars to bring anti-obscenity cases to courthouses across the country for the first time in 10 years. Nothing is off limits, they warn, even soft-core cable programs such as HBO's long-running Real Sex or the adult movies widely offered in rooms of major hotel chains.
Department officials say they will send "ripples" through an industry that has proliferated on the Internet and grown into an estimated $10 billion-a-year colossus profiting Fortune 500 corporations such as Comcast, which offers hard-core movies on a pay-per-view channel.
(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: algoresfault; antichristianbigot; ashcroftbashing; babyboomers; blamealgore; clintonlegacy; clintonlibertarians; crime; culturewar; doasthouwill; fbi; hedonism; hedonists; homosexualagenda; ifitfeelsgooddoit; internetporn; itsjustsex; libertarianflamewar; libertinarians; libertines; obscenity; obscenitylaws; permissivesociety; porn; pornisfun; pornisgood; pornography; promiscuity; religiousintolerance; sex; slipperyslope; supremecourt; waronporn; wasteoftime; wildgoosechase
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 641-658 next last
To: antiRepublicrat
Wait, was that an argument for the legalization of prostitution I just heard? :)
I should have guessed this thread would be quite popular...
21
posted on
04/05/2004 9:40:31 PM PDT
by
Quick1
To: Quick1
We got Iraq, Afghanastan, border problems, and a bloated defecit, but Porn(outside of Child Porn) is a major priority? C'mon.
22
posted on
04/05/2004 9:42:01 PM PDT
by
Dan from Michigan
("My governor don't got the answer")
To: cyborg
I agree. I just see so many folks who just accept internet porn in their mail boxes as part of internet life.
It just shouldnt be so in your face.
A person should have to actively seek it to find it not actively block it
23
posted on
04/05/2004 9:42:33 PM PDT
by
mylife
To: Quick1
I should hope that they aren't TOO serious about this. It would put my neighbor's wife in a real quandary. How would she continue her business that caters to bizarre people who like to see pictures of unattractive women that walk about in public wearing nothing but a viking helmet? How would I continue my photography business that focuses on taking nude photographs of unattractive women in public wearing nothing but viking helmets?
This is just too much.
24
posted on
04/05/2004 9:43:38 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.)
To: Quick1
Just read the full article:
said pornography "invades our homes persistently though the mail, phone, VCR, cable TV and the Internet,
Gotta love propaganda. Porn only "invades" via some spam, and that is a very specific problem. Porn by all other methods is chosen by the consumer to come into the home.
To: Quick1
Wait, was that an argument for the legalization of prostitution I just heard? That's a different subject, but I'm for that, too. I've just seen too many countries where it's regulated, and abuse and disease are much rarer there, plus it's taxed.
To: Quick1
I notice that this article quotes Larry Flynt (who opposes Bush to the point of making up stupid rumors about him) several times, as well as some other pornographers.
About half way through the piece, it just turns the blowtorch full blast on John Ashcroft, with a bunch of innuendo but no actual facts. The article really seems to object to Ashcrofts' Christianity, for some reason.
My judgment: This article is a fake, just another loony hit piece on Bush by America's unbiased media. Read the article closely; notice how it doesn't really say anything.
27
posted on
04/05/2004 9:51:23 PM PDT
by
Starve The Beast
(I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
To: antiRepublicrat
Indeed. yes. yes.
To: Quick1
hmmm...a war against porn. So would traci lords be a defector from the enemy side? If we capture some porn actresses and put them in a POW camp, can I be a guard?
29
posted on
04/05/2004 9:59:39 PM PDT
by
isom35
To: isom35
Get in line, buddy. :)
30
posted on
04/05/2004 10:02:24 PM PDT
by
Quick1
To: Quick1
This is nothing but a typical government shakedown, no different than any of the other shakedown operations they run. Here's how it works. Govt targets some producer of pr0n and then through threats amounting to extortion (I'm shocked!) gets the producer to agree to stop producing pr0n under their current business and to forfeit (pay tribute) to Uncle Sham to the tune of a couple of hundred thousand dollars (which to the pr0n business is just an expensive cost of doing business.) They take that $200k and use it to fund their next extortion of their next target. The idea here isn't to stop it, it's to create a self-funding shakedown operation that makes nice headlines for the "folks."
31
posted on
04/05/2004 10:03:24 PM PDT
by
agitator
(...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
To: Starve The Beast
32
posted on
04/05/2004 10:05:36 PM PDT
by
Quick1
To: Quick1
Mmmmm, you're right, this is worse than I thought.
I notice that what they seem to be targeting is 'obscenity', as opposed to pornography, but that's not much comfort. A DOJ that spends time and money going after something that subjective scares me a lot more than pictures of people having sex with animals, or whatever.
Thanks for the info.
33
posted on
04/05/2004 10:12:40 PM PDT
by
Starve The Beast
(I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
To: Quick1
Sounds like trial lawyers about to make some money.
34
posted on
04/05/2004 10:20:02 PM PDT
by
oyez
To: Quick1
We're at WAR with Islamofacists, some of whom live among us. Priorities, people.
35
posted on
04/05/2004 10:33:09 PM PDT
by
ellery
(Our court system is a joke)
To: Hunble
Today, if you get exposed to child pornography, you can bet that there is some Government employee posting it. This is how they justify their jobs.
The most ludicrous statement I've ever seen posted at FR.
36
posted on
04/05/2004 10:46:08 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
(Garofalo only eats crow when Freepers help her ...... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
To: Quick1
I find it interesting that of all the industries and businesses in the country, the sex industry is the only one the liberals want completely unregulated.
To: antiRepublicrat
The "standards" that HBO follows today are far removed from what was considered "acceptable" 20 years ago. Real Sex will show full frontal shots of she-males making out nowdays.
Where do you draw the line?
Not saying that an adult who wants to watch such freakshows on cable should be denied his program choice but should it be tolerated on Warner Brothers' signature pay-movie channel or should it be on an "adults only" channel?
38
posted on
04/05/2004 11:28:20 PM PDT
by
weegee
(No blood for ratings-CNN suppressed reports of torture & murder in Iraq to keep their Baghdad bureau)
To: Quick1
The nature of Associated Press is that each member files stories for the use of other members. From the looks of it, one of Knight-Ridder's reporters picked up the AP filing from Baltimore, rewrote it, then put it on the wire to Knight-Ridder's clients. (Or, in the alternative, the Baltimore reporter rewrote the KR story)
At any rate, the stories you linked to are all the same Knight-Ridder story bylined to the same reporter.
So... repetition of the story doesn't bolster its credibility if it all comes from the same source.
To: isom35
Scratch the surface of the porn industry and you'll find organized crime operating.
Traci Lords was underage when she made all but her final film (which she owned).
The Girls Gone Wild producer has escaped child porn charges since a judge ruled that those tapes are not pornography (although he still employed a minor who was too young to legally sign a release). He was also facing charges of being a drug dealer but I don't know where that stands today.
Larry Flynt contracted a murder hit against Bob Guccione.
If you were put in charge of guarding prisoners in the War on Porn, you'd likely be looking after some wiseguys. Maybe some 4-eyed geeks too (the kind who created SPAM, autodialers, spyware, and popup-hell code).
40
posted on
04/05/2004 11:35:11 PM PDT
by
weegee
(No blood for ratings-CNN suppressed reports of torture & murder in Iraq to keep their Baghdad bureau)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 641-658 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson