Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America no longer white, united, English-speaking
The Miami Herald ^ | 02 April 2004 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 04/03/2004 11:22:26 AM PST by MegaSilver

In 1960, when JFK defeated Nixon, America was a nation of 160 million, 90 percent white and 10 percent black, with a few million Hispanics and Asians sprinkled among us.

We were one nation, one people. We worshipped the same God, spoke the same English language, studied American history and English literature, honored the same heroes, read the same books, watched the same TV shows, went to the same movies and saw ourselves as defenders of Western civilization against the godless communism of the Soviet Empire.

We were confident and proud of who we were. That was yesterday. But due to the Immigration Act of 1965 and the cultural revolution of the '60s, that America is now gone forever. And as one studies the latest projections of the Census Bureau, the America of our grandchildren will be another country altogether, a nation unrecognizable to our parents, a giant Brazil of the North.

In 2050, there will be three times as many people living here as in 1960 -- 420 million. White Americans will be a minority, 49 percent, and falling. Hispanics in the United States, more than 100 million, will be equal to the population of today's Mexico. Our Asian population will be almost as large as our African-American population today.

By countries of origin, America will be a Third World nation. Our cities will look like Los Angeles today. Los Angeles and the cities of Texas, Arizona and California will look like Mexico City.

Writing in Foreign Policy, Harvard Professor Samuel Huntington, author of Who We Are, raises an alarm about the huge infusion of Hispanics into the Southwest, and for many reasons.

Much of this mass immigration is illegal. Vast numbers are coming here only to work. They are not assimilating. They do not want to become Americans. They are concentrating in states bordering Mexico, which is their country and a nation with a historic grievance against us. They are holding on to their language and culture, creating a Hispanic nation within our nation. By 2050, there will be scores of millions of people living here whose loyalty is to a foreign country.

Moreover, as multiculturalism has captured our schools and colleges, immigrant children will have prejudices and grievances against America and the West reinforced as they learn. The academic elite that controls these schools already paints America as a nation with a rancid history of genocide, slavery, racism, oppression and imperialism.

Is the Census Bureau future the future that Americans wish? No. Are they willing to risk it for their grandchildren? No.

Why, then, does that future appear inevitable?

Answer: Though a majority of Americans wish to preserve the land they grew up in for their children, our elites -- political, academic, cultural and corporate -- are either unwilling to conserve that America or indifferent to its disappearance.

Most Americans want immigration cut back and all illegal aliens sent back. Why is the will of the majority, expressed in polls and referenda, not reflected in law or policy? Because we no longer live in a democratic republic; we are ruled by a managerial elite.

America's corporate elites want an endless supply of cheap labor. Our judges throw out popularly enacted laws to which they object. Our academic elites work to see ''white, racist America'' disappear. Our neo-Marxist cultural elites wish to be the gravediggers of the West and of Christian culture. And America's conservative party, the Republican Party, believes that Hispanics hold the key to retention of presidential power and is anxious not to offend Mexican President Vicente Fox.

If, by 2050, the America we grew up in has become a Tower of Babel of squabbling minorities that is falling apart, it will be because of the treason of the elites, and our lack of will to overthrow them.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; aztlan; balkanization; breakingnews; buchanan; diversity; immigrantlist; immigration; multiculturalism; patbuchanan; patrickbuchanan; patrickjbuchanan; racistpat; sowhat; whoweare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 1,021-1,027 next last
To: wardaddy
LOL you're right... I need a beer.
421 posted on 04/03/2004 6:23:21 PM PST by cyborg (Frankenfreude radio death watch has commenced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Hey Dane.

I never said that I agree with Pat on much aside from his culture war views.

I do not share his isolationist, trade, Israel or anti-imperialism views.
422 posted on 04/03/2004 6:23:49 PM PST by wardaddy (If we don't nut up quick as a nation, we'll be foraging for the eggs of the sooty tern soon enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
I have to run back over to my latest business. Car Washes get swamped on sunny Saturdays. I'm doing it all firsthand before I hire an attendant.

Besides, I love to go see the counters on big days like today...lol

First venture I've done in decades that has beat my projections....hoorah for Capitalism!
423 posted on 04/03/2004 6:29:14 PM PST by wardaddy (If we don't nut up quick as a nation, we'll be foraging for the eggs of the sooty tern soon enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
I never said that I agree with Pat on much aside from his culture war views.

I do not share his isolationist, trade, Israel or anti-imperialism views

Fair enough.

Again JMO, but Pat's penchant for hyperbole and bombast discredits him even more.

424 posted on 04/03/2004 6:29:48 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
these folks with a history of oligarchies and turmoil will turn America into the shining beacon of responsible conservatism it always should have been.

All I see is this country drifting farther to the left.

Comparing immigrants of today to immigrants of old is absurd. 150 to 300 years ago, this country was basically a wilderness. People had to carve a society out of this with basically their bare hands. Clearing the land for farming, building a railroad system, starting of factories. (no welfare and few hospitals). Even 100 to 150 years ago had to be tough. Still no welfare.

These immigrants of today are walking right into a country who has the greatest interstructure on the face of this earth. To get welfare, all they have to do is ask.

No comparison.

425 posted on 04/03/2004 6:30:45 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
REALLY? Please freepmail me about that when you have time. I just started my own business. I feel like a dotcom IPO since I've already made money without doing anything *LOL* GOD BLESS AMERICA (and free market capitalism)
426 posted on 04/03/2004 6:32:22 PM PST by cyborg (Frankenfreude radio death watch has commenced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Then why did you post it without a date

Link to F.A.I.R. article

Please place your cursor over the above link and do a left mouse click. The date is there on the article.

Now what do you have to refute?

427 posted on 04/03/2004 6:36:58 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
I agree. Circumstances are quite different.

I have usually embraced a reasonable number of immigrants...especially those running from collectivist tyranny.

However, in 1965 (geez, so many great things came out of LBJ and the Dems of that period)....all of that changed....and now here we are....open doors essentially.

Now, when I tried to get residency for my ex-wife (brasil) back when we were married with 2 girls...the INS treated us like dirt and I had to pay about 5K to a "migra" lawyer.

Now, just walk in....get medical care, an education in your native tongue, vote dem, welfare....hell...who can blame them..lol
428 posted on 04/03/2004 6:39:31 PM PST by wardaddy (If we don't nut up quick as a nation, we'll be foraging for the eggs of the sooty tern soon enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
Pat Buchanan is a nut case. I cringe at almost everything he writes.
429 posted on 04/03/2004 6:40:52 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
Please place your cursor over the above link and do a left mouse click. The date is there on the article

I didn't hit the link. You could have had the courtesy to have provided the actual date within your FR reply, but decided not to add it to your FR reply.

430 posted on 04/03/2004 6:41:09 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
Pat Buchanan is a nut case. I cringe at almost everything he writes.

I'm not a fan of Buchanan, but that doesn't preclude me reading what he has to say and considering it. Quite often, I disagree with him. Not always, though.

431 posted on 04/03/2004 6:44:46 PM PST by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Wow I guess you pretty much silenced that student.

Yeah. That shut him up. I was a middling student of WWII history, but as a youngster I'd seen The Battle of the Bulge (1965, starring Hank Fonda and a young, pre-5-0 James MacArthur) on TV, and never forgot the scene depicting the slaughter of our POWs in the Ardennes. I realize that the movie was hardly a documentary, but my understanding is that the handling of the execution was true to the facts.

432 posted on 04/03/2004 6:54:41 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Look Dane, my son has the Three Stooges marathon on AMC going on in the backround and they're making more sense than you.

Ref. post 399 again. I put a link up to the article and I put up a snippet.. The snippet was a courtesy since the article was fairly long. I've been on the FR one and a half years and many links and snippets are posted without dates and besides, if I wanted to hide the date, why would I have brought it up?

Now, explain to me why the President can't get his energy bill through a Republican Congress so we can start drilling in ANWER?

433 posted on 04/03/2004 6:56:56 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: judgeandjury
I agree. It is the folks that are from Mexico that seem to work the hardest, I am sure it is becasue they are here illegally and will do what ever it takes to keep there job...
434 posted on 04/03/2004 6:56:59 PM PST by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Where does Pat get the impression that the republican party is conservative???? The elites own and operate both parties.

Yikess

435 posted on 04/03/2004 6:57:24 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
I'll get back to you later Wardaddy. Its been a busy day and I'm now just getting to eat supper. (BBQ chicken)
436 posted on 04/03/2004 6:59:57 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
What specifically do you disagree with?
437 posted on 04/03/2004 7:02:08 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
I think I misread your post. If so, I agree....Homerun..
438 posted on 04/03/2004 7:03:54 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
Now, explain to me why the President can't get his energy bill through a Republican Congress so we can start drilling in ANWER?

He can get it through a Republican house, but not through an almost 50-50 Senate. 95% of the demos are against it and about 90% of the Pubbies are for it in the Senate.

BTW, the Stooges can do a better job of trying to pull the wool over someones eyes than you tried to do by masking the publication date of your original reply.

But your hubris won't let you admit that you were caught. Have fun watching your contemporaries on AMC.

439 posted on 04/03/2004 7:07:21 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The whole article is racist in fact.

Want you're input. What did you find racist..... It's Saturday night Dog!

440 posted on 04/03/2004 7:08:40 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 1,021-1,027 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson