Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Rover finds more signs of past water on Mars
Sac Bee ^ | 4/1/04 | Andrew Bridges - AP

Posted on 04/01/2004 4:15:17 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/12/2004 6:07:56 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

PASADENA, Calif. (AP) - NASA's Spirit rover discovered more evidence of past water activity on Mars, although not in as great amounts as the twin rover Opportunity found on the other side of the planet, mission scientists said Thursday.

The findings come from analysis of a rock dubbed Mazatzal in the Gusev Crater region where Spirit landed on Jan. 3. Since then Spirit has been overshadowed by Opportunity as it found signs that extensive water, possibly a salty sea, once covered its landing site on Meridiani Planum.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mars; marsrover; mazatzal; nasa; signs; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Large

1 posted on 04/01/2004 4:15:18 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Donate Here By Secure Server
2 posted on 04/01/2004 4:17:33 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Shela Jackson Lee says one of the astronauts must have whizzed there.
3 posted on 04/01/2004 4:20:12 PM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

sol 66, Apr 01, 2004: Biting into 'Bounce'

Opportunity's rock abrasion tool ground into "Bounce" for just over two hours, producing a 6.44-millimeter (0.25 inch) hole that will allow the rover's spectrometer's to analyze the rock's chemical composition.





This is a plot of panoramic camera spectra extracted from three different regions on the rock dubbed "Bounce." The yellow spectrum is from the yellow box in the image on the left, from the dusty top part of the rock. The spectrum is dominated by the signature of oxidized "ferric" iron (Fe3+) like that seen in the classic Martian dust. The red spectrum is from the darker Meridiani Planum soils that were disturbed by the airbag when it bounced near the rock. That spectrum is also dominated by ferric iron, though the reflectivity is lower. Scientists speculate that this may be because the grains are coarser in these soils compared to the dust. The green spectrum, which is from the right side of the rock, shows a strong drop in the infrared reflectance that is unlike any other rock yet seen at Meridiani Planum or Gusev Crater. This spectral signature is typical of un-oxidized "ferrous" iron (Fe2+) in the rock, perhaps related to the presence of volcanic minerals like olivine or pyroxene. The possibility that this may be a basaltic rock that is distinctly different from the rocks seen in the Eagle Crater outcrop is being intensively explored using the rover's other instruments.

Image credit: NASA/JPL/Cornell

Browse Image (32 kB) | Large (287 kB)

Bon Jovi's "Bounce" woke Opportunity on its 66th sol, which ended at 2:41 a.m. PST on April 1. The martian morning began with the alpha particle X-ray spectrometer observing a target called "Glanz2" on Bounce. Miniature thermal emission spectrometer measurements of the ground and sky followed.

The rock abrasion tool was then placed on the target dubbed "Case." After the grind, the Mössbauer spectrometer was placed on the hole for an overnight integration.

In the afternoon, the rover also had time to complete more atmospheric science with its panoramic camera and miniature thermal emission spectrometer.

In the coming sols, Opportunity will remain parked at the intriguing Bounce rock to continue its investigations.

4 posted on 04/01/2004 4:21:15 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ... Become a FR Monthly Donor ... Kerry thread archive @ /~normsrevenge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I don't mean to be a simpleton here, but I have a question that's most likely pretty elementary, but has me wanting to know.

Just where does water go? In a planet with an atmosphere, it doesn't just go out into space thru osmosis. There is maybe a mantle system and did those oceans drain into the mantle layers like a big rocky waterbag underground?

I mean water is preumably there to stay as long as it does not get molecularly changed?

Can someone explain to me how water just goes away?

5 posted on 04/01/2004 4:25:15 PM PST by blackdog (I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
More bullshit from NASA. It would make more sense to repair the Hubble.
6 posted on 04/01/2004 4:26:27 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
There is negligable atmosphere on Mars, so, yes, there is some boiloff to space. However, there is also some evidence that there is water ice bound in the soil, and perhaps, maybe, POSSIBLY, some liquid stuff in deeper aquifers of some kind.
7 posted on 04/01/2004 4:29:12 PM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Notice the sharp defined edge of that one rock in the center of the picture? It would seem to be very unweathered and recently fractured somehow?
8 posted on 04/01/2004 4:30:34 PM PST by blackdog (I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
Just where does water go?

The lizards drank it.

It is just absolute nonsense for us to be contemplating putting people one Mars. Balance the budget first.

9 posted on 04/01/2004 4:30:39 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
Why?
10 posted on 04/01/2004 4:30:45 PM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
"Balance the budget first."

hahahahaha... Abandoning space will not help balance the budget.
11 posted on 04/01/2004 4:32:19 PM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
Why?

Why what?

Why don't you know how to quote that to which you are responding? I have no idea.

12 posted on 04/01/2004 4:33:00 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
I think we might be developing a bunker buster to make a fresh hole in an area that might result in some water being exposed?

First send a nuclear tipped bunker buster to make a giant creator and then follow it a month later with a probe?

Imagine the liberals outrage if Bush Nukes Mars!

13 posted on 04/01/2004 4:34:41 PM PST by blackdog (I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
You're the one being obtuse. "Why?" refers to your ENTIRE post. Hence, it was an open-ended question.
14 posted on 04/01/2004 4:35:17 PM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
MAke a little pond, eh? A spectacular show, to be sure.
15 posted on 04/01/2004 4:36:19 PM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Even more signs that there was water on Mars:


16 posted on 04/01/2004 4:36:54 PM PST by So Cal Rocket (If consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, John F. Kerry’s mind must be freaking enormous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
If the lizards drank it, the lizards drain it.

And if you balance a federal budget, spending will go even higher. When money is 2% cost, it's no big deal. It's almost free money.

17 posted on 04/01/2004 4:38:27 PM PST by blackdog (I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
Abandoning space will not help balance the budget.

Sending people into space is a huge boondoggle. I cannot imagine a worse waste of money. The war in Iraq comes close, but not all that close.

The Hubble was / is productive. We could do an even better one.

18 posted on 04/01/2004 4:38:52 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

19 posted on 04/01/2004 4:40:12 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
You're the one being obtuse. "Why?" refers to your ENTIRE post. Hence, it was an open-ended question.

That's too easy on your part. Try a pointed question next time.

20 posted on 04/01/2004 4:42:11 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson