To: rogueleader
That's strange. I thought it was about oil.
2 posted on
03/30/2004 2:26:42 PM PST by
Brilliant
To: rogueleader
A quick look at the the "Inter Press Service" who provided this article shows them to be leftist propagandists. SSDD.
To: rogueleader
Yeah, its not really in the US interest to protect Israel from being nuked by Saddam. SHEESH.
5 posted on
03/30/2004 2:29:30 PM PST by
JmyBryan
To: rogueleader
Do you think Iraq was all about the Joos?
6 posted on
03/30/2004 2:30:43 PM PST by
Stentor
To: rogueleader
Emad Mekay
Emad Mekay is the IPS trade and finance correspondent, based in Washington, D.C. He joined IPS in October 2001, and has since broken several stories related to controversial activities of the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank and the International Monetary Fund. He has also reported widely on the activities of the anti-globalisation movement, both in the United States and elsewhere in the world.
He was a winner of the 2003 Project Censored award from California's Sonoma State University for his 2002 story on the shady dealings of shamed multinationals Enron and Worldcom in the developing world.
7 posted on
03/30/2004 2:40:21 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(Leave Pat Leave!)
To: rogueleader
8 posted on
03/30/2004 2:44:42 PM PST by
Faraday
To: rogueleader
This is absolutely true. Robbie George, a sometime Bush Advisor at Princeton University has stated this since mid-2002.
To: rogueleader
Emad's sister was once bitten by a Jewish moose!
21 posted on
03/30/2004 4:32:59 PM PST by
verity
To: Allan
Ping.
25 posted on
03/31/2004 12:05:29 AM PST by
Mitchell
To: rogueleader
Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? They say the same thing about north korea, china, pakistan, russia.... Sorry I don't buy it.
38 posted on
03/31/2004 6:58:51 AM PST by
hoosierboy
(I am not a gun nut, I am a firearm enthusiast)
To: rogueleader
"Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? I'll tell you what I think the real threat (is) and actually has been since 1990--it's the threat against Israel," So, according to the article, anything that this guy "thinks" is true, is automatically the reason the US went to war in Iraq. Regardless of his position at the time, this pronouncment does NOT reflect official foreign policy.
Did we also have Isreal's interests in mind - most likely - so where is the "news"? We've have had Isreal's interests also in mind for quite a long time now. . . .
To: rogueleader
And if one of the motives for removing Saddam was Iraq's support of terrorism against Israel, this is a crime? And if bush can't admit this publicly, this is a crime?
Support of an ally is a crime?
49 posted on
03/31/2004 8:19:57 AM PST by
js1138
To: rogueleader
my head is spinning, how could this be?
To: rogueleader
Good work. You most have something personal against Zelikow to be so motivated to produce such good info.
Inspiration has many sources.
70 posted on
03/31/2004 6:48:59 PM PST by
bayourod
(We can depend on Scary Kerry's imaginary foreign leaders to protect us from terrorists.)
To: rogueleader
He should resign.
75 posted on
03/31/2004 8:53:43 PM PST by
dalebert
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson