Skip to comments.
Atheist Dad in 'Under God' Case Literally Applauded, But Likely to Lose
Christianity Today ^
| 3/25/04
| Ted Olsen
Posted on 03/26/2004 10:41:53 AM PST by Caleb1411
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Check the CT web site; the original article has several dozen links I didn't have time to insert.
1
posted on
03/26/2004 10:41:54 AM PST
by
Caleb1411
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: Caleb1411
Isn't it time to stop this practice in schools and reserve it for government jobs and the military?
3
posted on
03/26/2004 10:48:52 AM PST
by
breakem
To: Eala
Oops. There seem to be several forms of this statement:
... That's only because no atheist can get elected to public office," Newdow answered,
... Thats because no atheists can get elected to Congress, Newdow insisted
4
posted on
03/26/2004 10:49:03 AM PST
by
Eala
(Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
To: Eala
There is something just so sad and pitiful about an Athiest:
Hoping with all your might against the existence of God.
To: Eala
He's a fruitcake. He's the Hulk Hogan of lawyers. All push and no talent.
6
posted on
03/26/2004 10:53:03 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: breakem
While we are at it, why don't we reserve religion to churches and Sundays between the hours of 8 am and 1 pm only?
7
posted on
03/26/2004 10:58:37 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Caleb1411
I can only imagine what his kid's life must be like.
Can we say, "Destined to grow up with a host of neuroses, all stemming from issues related to her parental relatioship?"
To: Eala
Plenty of athiests get to Congress. But they do it lile all the liberals do, they lie about what theya re and pretend to be something else.
9
posted on
03/26/2004 11:00:14 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Caleb1411
Would a Supreme Court decision that said "under God" is okay simply because it's meaningless truly be a victory? It's a pretty fair analysis piece, once one gets past the gushing about Neudow's skills as a solicitor. And I, for one, DON'T wish to see the Court say -- in effect -- that God is meaningless in this context. If so, then the pledge is irrelevant. if so, the motto of our country ("In God We Trust") is equally irrelevant. The statement above from the article capsulated this point very well.
The only way out of this dilemma (seeing as the Court and society have chosen to use the hogwash phrase "separation of church and state" to be absolute) is for SCOTUS to rule that the 'mere existential affirmation' of God is not what makes one religious; it is the worship, prayers, praise, practices, rites, rituals, doctrine, dogma, and trappings of a group of people associated with "God" in their belief system that actually constitutes a "religion." People are free to accept this affirmation or not, but the United States Government simply acknowledges that God is a fact of life without passing judgment on any particular religion and its view of God.
10
posted on
03/26/2004 11:00:24 AM PST
by
alancarp
(NASCAR: Where everything's made up and the points don't matter.)
To: Caleb1411
The Supreme Court justicesthe six of them remaining, since Antonin Scalia recused himself Dear Christianity Today Editor
Nine minus one is equal to eight.
To: FourtySeven
Imagine how the "Row V. Wade" lady feels today...knowing that generations of children were killed based on her case. (She'd almost have to have become a Christian to survive the pain!) This kid will either be the center of attention for what did happen, or what didn't happen. Start buying the therapy now, in advance, while the rates are cheaper.
12
posted on
03/26/2004 11:02:20 AM PST
by
50sDad
( ST3d - Star Trek Tri-D Chess! http://my.oh.voyager.net/~abartmes)
To: Caleb1411
These days Rudy Ruettiger would be a starter.
To: Caleb1411
The Supreme Court justicesthe six of them remaining, since Antonin Scalia recused himselfmay have enjoyed bantering with the newbie, but a near-unanimous consensus among observers is that he's going to lose the case.9 - 1 = 8. Must be that new math.
14
posted on
03/26/2004 11:04:11 AM PST
by
4CJ
(||) OUR sins put Him on that cross - HIS love for us kept Him there. (||)
To: Blood of Tyrants
why limit your practice of religion to those days and hours. Just don't do it where others send their kids to taxpayer schools. Difficult concept I guess.
15
posted on
03/26/2004 11:04:46 AM PST
by
breakem
To: Stagerite
You beat me to it. Next time I'll finish reading the comments, but that new math was so ludicrous I felt I must respond.
16
posted on
03/26/2004 11:06:14 AM PST
by
4CJ
(||) OUR sins put Him on that cross - HIS love for us kept Him there. (||)
To: Caleb1411
As if CA didn't have enough to be embarrassed about.
17
posted on
03/26/2004 11:07:27 AM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: Caleb1411; Dataman
This adoring CT prose about obnoxious idiot Newdow, illustrating once again why I've never regretted cancelling my subscription years ago.
WORLD magazine will do better.
Dan
18
posted on
03/26/2004 11:11:23 AM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: 4ConservativeJustices
Nah -- the author understands that Scalia is worth at least three justices by himself.
19
posted on
03/26/2004 11:11:36 AM PST
by
alancarp
(NASCAR: Where everything's made up and the points don't matter.)
To: alancarp
"...The only way out of this dilemma..."
The only way out of this dilemma is to REMIND Michael Newdow that he is IN THE MINORITY on this matter. We, in the MAJORITY want "under God" kept right where it is. If he and the minority of like-minded types don't like, T H W T!!!!!
20
posted on
03/26/2004 11:15:50 AM PST
by
NCC-1701
(Support Mel Gibson and "The Passion of the Christ")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson