[Stu Cohen]

I would not vote for Kerry, but I would vote for Nadar. Let me explain.

I live in a solidly Blue state, so a vote for GWB would be completely wasted. California is going to Kerry whether I vote or not.

I don't want to vote for GWB anyway, because he has become Vicente Fox's mistress, and is contibuting to the deterioration and danger of my community through what I feel are treasonous policies toward border control.

Every vote for Nadar will piss just about every Democrat off to no end, since they will assume that it was a vote taken from Kerry. You know how much that drives them ape-s**t.

So, Nadar basically represents a safe protest vote (the man has zero chance of winning), while not backing Vice President Bush (Vicente being the true shot caller), and annoying a Democrat all in one fell swoop.

Either that, or i'll write myself in. I haven't decided yet.

I don't think either of the status-quo candidates have earned my vote this time around.

[Not A Snowbird]

I don't want to vote for GWB anyway, because he has become Vicente Fox's mistress, and is contibuting to the deterioration and danger of my community through what I feel are treasonous policies toward border control.

The California Coastal Commission has played a big part in stalling proposed protective measures along the SoCal border. Have you seen what those knuckleheads are doing?

[elli1]

So, Nadar basically represents a safe protest vote

No, it is not. A vote for Nadar empowers the wacko environmentalists. It distorts the reality of how many of them are and alters perceptions. Just like Rent-A-Mob does.

I'd advise you to go ahead & vote for Kerry. He'll fix all of California's problems. Just ask him.

[evilC]

I would not vote for Kerry, but I would vote for Nadar. Let me explain.....

Why not vote for a party that favors limited government (e.g. Constitution Party)?

While, your vote won't elect Nader, it will show as support for his socialist agenda. It certainly won't send a message to the Republicans to think about smaller government and immigration.

[singletrack]

Stu, I'll be doing the same thing form many of the same reasons. I live in New York. These morons voted hillary into office by a landslide.My Bush vote is wasted.After Florida 2000, I put a (poorly) handmade sign with "Nader 2004" in the back window of my car.The scolding and "I hope your happy now" type stuff was like music to my ears.Street FreeP!!I adopted the stupid voter persona to enrage and engage them further.My favorite "retorts" were to accuse the victim of racsism or homophobia, claim that Nader will protect the rifle barreled songbird or claim nader supports napster.Acting the part a of half brained lefty to piss off 3/4 brained lefties. Every vote and encounter will push the wedge deeper into the left..................NADER 2004!!!!!!

[sushiman]

"I don't want to vote for GWB anyway, because he has become Vicente Fox's mistress, "

I'm with you Stu !

[Wolfstar]

As for your voting strategy, whatever. Judging by your written statement in Post #23, you're beyond reason anyway.

The following verbatim quote from your statement makes my point:

"So, Nadar basically represents a safe protest vote (the man has zero chance of winning), while not backing Vice President Bush..."