Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australia Says It Stands by the U.S.
ABC News ^ | 16/03/2004 | The Associated Press

Posted on 03/16/2004 11:50:30 AM PST by helives

Australia Says It Stands by the U.S.

Australia Says It Won't Back Away From U.S. Despite Fears It Could Be the Next Terror Target

The Associated Press

SYDNEY, Australia March 16 — Australia's foreign minister promised Tuesday that the government would not back away from its close alliance with the United States despite the terrorist bombing attacks on Spain, another member of the U.S.-led occupation force in Iraq.

Foreign Minister Alexander Downer urged Spain's new prime minister not to pull its 1,300 troops from Iraq, as he has promised to do unless the United Nations takes over peacekeeping by June 30.

"It is enormously important that the international community send a strong message to al-Qaida," Downer told reporters. "We will maintain our determination and our resolve to defeat terrorism, not to have our policies dictated by terrorists," he added.

The Madrid bombings last Thursday, which killed 201 people have been blamed on Islamic militants linked to al-Qaida, and raised worries that Australia could be next. Australia sent 2,000 troops to Iraq as part of the U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein and still has 850 military personnel there, while President Bush has described Prime Minister John Howard as his "sheriff" in Asia.

Howard has ordered a review of the vulnerability of Australia's sprawling transport network from crowded Sydney trains and ferries to remote air strips and ports where security is virtually nonexistent.

John Pistole, the executive assistant director for counterterrorism with the FBI, acknowledged the risks Australia faces.

"Any country that allies itself with the United States, unfortunately, is a target," Pistole told Sydney's 2UE radio station. "I would agree with the statement that an attack is likely inevitable."

Howard's opponents see clear parallels between what happened in Spain last week and what could happen in Australia.

The new Spanish prime minister, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero won an upset victory in elections Sunday over the ruling Popular Party. Most Spaniards opposed former Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar's support of the Iraq war, and many believed he made Spain a target for terrorists by his pro-U.S. policies.

Australia has elections later this year. The opposition Labor Party, which currently leads Howard's government in opinion polls, was against the Iraq conflict and Howard's decision to join the U.S.-led invasion.

Howard and his conservative government acknowledge the terror menace, but deny that it is any worse since it sent 2,000 troops to the Iraq war last year. His alliance with the United States is unlikely to change.

He firmly believes that Australia's military alliance with Washington signed after the war remains key to his country's national security.

Australians have fought alongside American forces in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq. But now the threat of terror looms closer to home.

On Oct. 12, 2002, al-Qaida-linked Islamic extremists bombed two bars on the vacation island of Bal. Eighty-eight of the 202 people killed were Australian tourists.

After the Bali bombs, federal police and intelligence agents raided homes of Muslims across Australia in an attempt to gauge the strength here of Jemaah Islamiyah, the Southeast Asian group held responsible.

Authorities said they found no al-Qaida cells.

Howard downplayed the fears, but also conceded Australia is no longer immune from terror attacks.

"This is still by world standards a very safe country, but I'm very sad to report as prime minister that because of changed circumstances nobody can assume that this country is safe from attack," Howard told Sydney radio station 2GB on Tuesday.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: allies; allyaustralia; australia; elections; howard; spain; staythecourse; terror; terrorists
We are one!!
1 posted on 03/16/2004 11:50:31 AM PST by helives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: helives
Somewhere I read a quote, maybe someone here knows who said it...."Aussies are mostly Texas cowboys with neat accents."
3 posted on 03/16/2004 12:08:13 PM PST by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: helives
Thank you "mites"!
I knew you would.
4 posted on 03/16/2004 12:11:47 PM PST by Publius6961 (50.3% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks (subject to a final count).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: helives
Even though Honduras and Spain are pulling out. HeHe

Thanks Aussies
5 posted on 03/16/2004 12:19:46 PM PST by BiteMedems (Proud Voter of GWB Term One and Term Two)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mitch5501
ping mitch
6 posted on 03/16/2004 12:20:03 PM PST by helives (God bless Israel, God bless Australia, God bless America, God bless western civilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Well I will be voting for John Howard, I just pray the rest of the country see's sense and votes for him too!!

I pray to God those lilly livered, head in the sand, Labor mongrels dont get a look in

Backing away from the terrorists will not bring safety or peace, that I believe absolutely!!

7 posted on 03/16/2004 12:24:18 PM PST by helives (God bless Israel, God bless Australia, God bless America, God bless western civilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: helives
Cheers back at ya.
8 posted on 03/16/2004 12:29:38 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TrebleRebel
Yea, Texas cowboys with funny accents who've banned firearms and are now in the process (in case you missed the FR thread about it a few days ago)of banning swords.

Doesn't sound very Texas like to me.

9 posted on 03/16/2004 12:31:05 PM PST by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: helives
Australia
Throughout many trying times - true Friends
THANKS!
10 posted on 03/16/2004 12:33:23 PM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
THANK-YOU AUSTRALIA !!! ... GOD BLESS YOU
11 posted on 03/16/2004 12:46:00 PM PST by saxxa (FIRE-FIGHTER FOR PRESIDENT BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Yea, Texas cowboys with funny accents who've banned firearms and are now in the process (in case you missed the FR thread about it a few days ago)of banning swords.

Sorry I missed that thread...I don't camp here every day for hours on end.

I couldn't care less what is banned in Australia, as long as Aussie soldiers are given guns in Iraq.

12 posted on 03/16/2004 1:24:13 PM PST by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: helives
There's a man of great good sense.
13 posted on 03/16/2004 1:28:36 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: helives
Aussie: short for AWESOME!
14 posted on 03/16/2004 2:55:44 PM PST by Enduring Freedom (REMEMBER 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: helives
I think Howard will get back in.

For the US people here, his competition, Mark Latham, is still 'new' in the job as the other choice (like Kerry, I mean, Latham has been around forever, but he's only been Opposition Leader for a short time) and I think that fact alone is what has him ahead of Howard in the polls at the moment. The fact that the guy has no vision and NO policies will become a reality to everyone soon and Howard will move ahead, and win the election. I don't believe Latham will get in for a second. And with Howard as leader, a Spain type scenario here would only strengthen his determination, he wouldn't buckle. That I am 110% sure of.

BTW Our election dates aren't set in stone as they are in the US. It has to happen at some time during this year, but the timing of it is Howards choosing. I can guarantee it will be long before the US elections, and he'll call it with the minimum 'official' campaigning time he can as per the rules (I think that's about a month?). We are, however, well and truly getting into campaign mode here. I'm betting it will be called anytime between 'any day now' at the earliest and July at the latest.

15 posted on 03/17/2004 2:23:58 AM PST by ShadyBrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Yea, Texas cowboys with funny accents who've banned firearms and are now in the process (in case you missed the FR thread about it a few days ago)of banning swords.

Doesn't sound very Texas like to me.

Yet despite this,the Australian citizenry remains one the most armed on earth.None of the other countries in the world who have gun control have shown such defiance to stupid laws.Gun control in Australia is an unenforcable pseudo-law,and everyone knows it besides a handful of internet-nra-advocates who have probably never handled a gun in their lives and sure as hell know ZIP about Australia besides what they read in newsbites.If they actually went to Australia and said the things they do on the net to any random Australian male,they'd wind up stripped of their masculinity in about 3 seconds.

If theres a shooting in Australia,they blame it on gun control,if theres a crime,they blame it on gun control,if someone defends themselves with a gun,they blame it on gun control,if 75% of guns are unregistered,they blame it on gun control.

BTW,it is only ONE state that is trying to restrict underage people from purchasing swords.Which will probably have as much impact as gun control has had on weapon ownership......none.

Australia,20 million people,'gun control',4 million guns.

16 posted on 03/17/2004 7:22:25 AM PST by browsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: helives
G'day mic!

"Any country that allies itself with the United States, unfortunately, is a target," Pistole told Sydney's 2UE radio station."

That's a given.

However in no way should it be used as a reason not to back America.

Should America have not supported Britain,Australia etc etc etc during WW2 because they would have been more of a target to the Germans,Japanese etc?

I have no doubt that if we here downunder were the recipients of 911 Bush would have been on the phone to Howard in 5 minutes flat asking which direction to aim!

The 'world' is in even bigger trouble than it is already if the likes of Kerry et al are elected.

God bless America and all those who sail with her.

17 posted on 03/17/2004 4:09:23 PM PST by mitch5501 (by the grace of God,I am what I am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson