[Hannahs-dad]

I don't know if I'm doing this right, I think it's only my 2nd time ever posting here. In case I'm royally messing it up, I am attempting to reply to the article Lando Lincoln posted by Adam.

I can see it now how any liberals would react to this. They will basically ignore the content of the post and the simple logic, and focus on the wording. They will attack it for hate rhetoric and compare it to McCarthyism. Which is why I would recommend Adam tone it down. It's not that I don't agree with his essay 100%, I do; however, as eloquent as he is I believe he could write this same article in words that would leave the liberals nothing to attack BUT the content and logic. There, as you know, they would fail miserably.

By the way, I usually post on another forum and I've heard SOME (haven't read the manual yet) of the lesser indoctrinated liberals actually come out and say they believe the answer to world peace is to weaken (Clinton closed HOW many military bases, and sold WHAT to China?) America till it is no longer a superpower (Kerry has voted HOW often AGAINST intelligence spending and FOR intelligence cuts?). They also want America to become no richer than any other nation, they believe we should be taxed as much as European nations. (is that 50% on average?). Does it take a rocket scientist to realize they want to tax us so heavily so they can send all our money to other countries?

[Lando Lincoln]

Your point (and post) is well made. The tone and tenor of the "rhetoric" is how the left dismisses the likes of Ann Coulter. They can't win on logic.

Lando

[nonliberal]

You did it right. Welcome aboard!!

[MeekOneGOP]

Thanks, and welcome to FreeRepublic.com ! ;^)

[Doug Loss]

I respectfully disagree. The liberals will call anyone opposing them fascist and nazi regardless of the tone of the comments. Being polite to them is just seen as a sign of weakness, and is something they couldn't imagine reciprocating. When they lie, we need to call them on it, bluntly. Say, "That's a lie, and you know it." When they trot out their standard litany (I'm using that word precisely) of socialist arguments we need to say, "Your positions make no sense logically, economically, or politically. They can only be viewed as the tenets of a secular religion, socialism. It's been proven to be a false religion many times over during the 20th Century; perhaps you should examine your beliefs against the evidence of the world, if you're capable of doing so."

[Onelifetogive]

I believe he could write this same article in words that would leave the liberals nothing to attack BUT the content and logic.

He should write it more along the lines of the movie "The Passion"... That would leave the liberals nothing to attack...

</sarcasm>