Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

E-Mail: Attack on U.S. '90 Percent Ready'
Fox News ^ | 03/11/2004 | AP

Posted on 03/12/2004 8:14:36 AM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:39:13 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

CAIRO, Egypt

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abuhafsalmasri; alqaeda; alquaeda; jihad; jundalquds; scumbags; terrorism; windsofblackdeath
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last
To: HitmanNY
I fear you are correct.

Alas we wouldn't fight fire with fire, and that may be the end of us.
41 posted on 03/12/2004 9:03:17 AM PST by CygnusXI (Where's that dang Meteor already?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Dog Anchor
No, they play switch.
43 posted on 03/12/2004 9:12:06 AM PST by BMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CygnusXI
Yea no doubt in my mind - that's not to say we won't win, its just that we are handicapping ourselves.
44 posted on 03/12/2004 9:14:42 AM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
I suppose you were right the first time. This is a religious war, and been going on for 4,000 yuears. This is Allah versus the infidels. Destroy their "god" and you destroy their will. Expose their god as being impotent. Promise to shower their countries with pig fat.

Level the Mosque of Omar, if that isn't sufficent, level Medina and then Mecca. This is strategic and will prevent the loss of innocent life.

Blessings, Bobo
45 posted on 03/12/2004 9:19:50 AM PST by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Peter J. Huss
They have made many warnings in the past, and I think they used the Madrid bombings as a signal to their operatives in the field.

Couldn't they have just made a few phone calls?

46 posted on 03/12/2004 9:23:51 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Any day you wake up is a good day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bobo1
Go to Google, and type in "Black Wind of Death Muslim".

This will take you to a very interesting read about the meaning of "black wind of death".
47 posted on 03/12/2004 9:25:03 AM PST by Moorecows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
I was thinking more on the line of this.


48 posted on 03/12/2004 9:25:28 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (I have more time in the chow line than John f'ing Kerry spent in Vietnam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Moorecows
Thank you very much. I appreciate the link.

Blessings, bobo
49 posted on 03/12/2004 9:30:12 AM PST by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Iron Matron
We should purge them all!
50 posted on 03/12/2004 9:33:58 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
"The next attack will lead to millions of muslims looking towards two smouldering ruins for prayer."

Yup.
51 posted on 03/12/2004 9:35:07 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Matron
"If muslimes attack the United States again, I'm fearful that it will not bode well for the muslimes currently calling themselves Americans."

I was thinking the same thing. If they hit us again, especially with some sort of WMD, I would not want to be a Moslem in America.
52 posted on 03/12/2004 9:41:29 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Man, I thought I was the only one who did stuff like that!
53 posted on 03/12/2004 9:46:26 AM PST by mommybain (not Walmart greeter material)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
"Anyone ever expecting the USA to go nuclear, even should we suffer a limited nuclear attack by terrorists, is living in fantasyland."

I disagree. If we are hit with a nuke, all the restraints will be removed. I think we'd even do a "selective burn" if we are hit with something that causes a huge amount of casualties, even if it wasn't a WMD.
54 posted on 03/12/2004 9:48:53 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
I understand the reason for the picture, but it sent chills up my spine. When I first looked at it, I thought of a large gathering of Americans at a concert or something.
55 posted on 03/12/2004 9:50:13 AM PST by MEGoody (Kerry - isn't that a girl's name? (Conan O'Brian))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
Just correcting the AP for the zillionth time . . . It's a mistake to concentrate on bin Laden and his so-called "militant" muslims. Bin Laden is just a general in a much larger army, and they are just its shock troops. When we concentrate on the entire army of islam instead of one of its elite units, we'll win this war rather quickly.

Here's a fun little piece of popular muslim lore to remind us what we're up against. It's near and dear to every muslim's heart:

"Ali Ibn Abi Talib encountered a man called 'Umru and told him, `I indeed invite you to Islam.' 'Umru said, `I do not need that.' 'Ali said, Then I call you to fight.' (This was the same policy Muhammad used with those who rejected his invitation.) 'Umru answered him, `What for my nephew? By God, I do not like to kill you.' `Ali said, `But, by God, I love to kill you"' (ibn Hisham, "The Biography of the Prophet", part 3, p. 113; see also Al Road Al Anf part 3, p. 263).

56 posted on 03/12/2004 9:54:13 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobo1
1300 years. Let's end it within the next 2.
57 posted on 03/12/2004 9:55:50 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
OK, we disagree then. I don't think there is anybody on the US political scene today - on either side of the aisle - that would make that decision.

Talk of 'all restraints would be removed' is nice, but I just don't see 'all restraints removed' after a limited nuclear strike against a couple of us cities meaning 'we go nuclear.'
58 posted on 03/12/2004 9:56:49 AM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Moorecows
Well according to what I read, the Black Wind of Death is either an economic collapse or a nuke. But the description of the Black Wind as being of fire and ash and smoke and boiling water sure sounds nuclear to me.
59 posted on 03/12/2004 9:57:05 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
The pressure for a nuclear response to a nuke attack on us would be substantial. Moreover, there is not a nuclear power on this planet that would not nuke in response to it being nuked first. And you know it.
60 posted on 03/12/2004 10:00:21 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson