Posted on 03/08/2004 9:06:07 AM PST by truthandlife
If same-sex marriage is legalized nationwide in America, as some believe it will be, then the liberal views of teenagers and young adults are sure to play a large role.
This view is widespread among same-sex marriage supporters, who constantly cite polls showing what they claim are Americas changing attitudes. Teens, they say, are embracing homosexual marriage.
Deb Price, who works for The Detroit News, wrote a column last year about two high school students, Amanda Blair and Stephanie Haaser, who fought to change their respective schools attitudes on homosexuality. Price, a homosexual, believes same-sex marriage may be inevitable.
The gay-friendly generation of Blair and Haaser will eventually take control of the most powerful jobs in the corporate, political and educational worlds, she wrote.
Others agree.
Recently, during a protest against marriage laws in Illinois, a woman in Chicago told the local newspaper: In 100 years, history books will look back on what's happening right now with judgment.
Conservatives in recent years have been emboldened by polls showing that teenagers are more pro-life than their parents. But, if the polls are right, those same teens also are more likely to embrace same-sex marriage. Although polls differ, nearly all of them show that teens are at least 10 percentage points more likely to embrace changing the definition of marriage.
Consider:
-- A December New York Times poll showed that Americans opposed same-sex marriage by a margin of 61-34 percent. But the results among 18-29-years-olds were just the opposite -- 56 percent supportive, 40 percent opposed.
-- A February Newsweek poll showed that 47 percent of Americans favored either same-sex marriage or civil unions (23 percent marriage, 24 percent civil unions). But 58 percent of 18-29-year-olds favored some form of recognition (39 percent marriage, 19 percent civil unions).
The million-dollar question is this: Will those same teenagers and young adults stick with those beliefs?
[O]ne would have to question, Well, when they grow up and get older will they be like todays older people, or will they carry with them these attitudes throughout their lives? political analyst Michael Barone told Baptist Press. I could make a plausible argument for either position. I dont know which one is right.
The generation gap has been influenced by everything from television to academia to parenting, leaders say.
I attribute it to the unrelenting pro-homosexual propaganda that theyve grown up with, said Peter Sprigg, director of the Family Research Council's Center for Marriage and Family Studies. I think that although the majority of Americans overall still oppose homosexual marriage and oppose homosexuality, there is an overwhelming pro-homosexual bias in some of our major cultural institutions, such as academia, such as the news media and particularly the entertainment media, which is very influential with young people.
I think we have a whole generation that has been raised on pro-homosexual mythology.
Sprigg says higher education has been a big culprit, with public schools playing a smaller role. He notes that polls show that those with a college education are more likely to support same-sex marriage.
Thats not because theyre more intelligent, he said. Its because theyve been subjected to this kind of teaching.
Young people also have been raised on MTV, which promotes homosexuality through such programs as the Real World, and network television, which increasingly has added homosexual characters to its programming in recent years.
The gay character is always depicted as the wisest, the funniest, the best dressed, the most stylish, the most reasonable, Sprigg said. Thats a very subtle but effective form of propaganda, I believe.
In addition to television and academia, the breakdown of the family also has played a large role in shaping the attitudes of teens and young adults, some say.
Since the late 1960s there has been an increasingly smaller percentage of parents rearing children from a uniquely biblical perspective, said Richard Ross, professor of student ministries at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary and spokesperson for the abstinence-focused True Love Waits program for teenagers.
Until this present generation of teenagers came on the scene, we were seeing -- reflected in each succeeding group of teenagers -- a smaller percentage embracing biblical values. Interestingly among teenagers in 2004, on some measures we are seeing teenagers more conservative than their parents.
But same-sex marriage is an exception. Ross quoted a yet-to-be-published study by University of North Carolina researchers showing that teens have what he termed an absolute resistance to passing judgment on any faith, philosophy or lifestyle.
We have trained the teenagers to believe that truth is relative and to believe we must be tolerant to all, he said. And that teaching has been uniformly successful.
Sprigg called the current homosexual movement the culmination of the sexual revolution that began in the mid-20th century that taught you should be able to have sex with anybody you want, whenever you want.
Many people become more conservative when they marry and have children Sprigg said, adding that that could happen to the younger generation.
[I]f they had a child in first grade and suddenly discovered their child was being taught about homosexuality in their first-grade public school classroom, I think it would give them pause, and they would say, Wait a second, this is going too far, he said.
Ross isnt so optimistic.
I think instruction in tolerance has been so pervasive that teenagers will likely carry this perspective into adulthood unless there is very quick and very clear teaching in an opposite direction, he said. I am not hopeful, though, that this will take place. The vast majority of faithful parents in the church have abdicated Christian instruction to the church. Parents have come to believe that faithfully taxiing teenagers to and from the church fulfills their responsibility. This grieves me because parents have the power to shape lifetime values within their teenagers.
One reason teens and young adults have different views, Sprigg said, is because they confuse what he believes are two very different issues. One concerns the victimization of homosexuals, the other the definition of marriage.
They dont want to see [homosexuals] harassed and [be] the victims of violence, he said. We agree with that.... [But] I think it is possible to separate the marriage issue from other concerns. Just because youre upset that some homosexuals are the victims of hate crimes doesnt mean that you have to grant same-sex marriage rights. It just doesnt logically follow.
How close is very close?
Spoken like a true Libertarian.
Yuck!
Why, thank you... Though, you'll get a lot of libertarians disagreeing with you on that, when you hit foreign and defense policy.
You just keep prattling like a pro-homosexual agendist.
Surely there is a website for sycophants.
Somehow I guessed as much. I must be psychic and voila!(a little French lingo here to show my lack of prejudice against frogs and other genders)it demonstrates your support of an agenda by homosexuals for America.
Problem is, the Dems don't want me, because I oppose gun control, support Bush's tax cuts, and support Bush's foreign and defense policy. The Libertarians don't want me, because I believe in God, support Bush's foreign and defense policy, and don't demand that everything be changed overnight.
That kinda leaves Republican sites as my only option. What's more, most Republicans don't try to run me off for not toeing the GOP line -- unlike most Democrats and a surprising amount of LPers.
No, but my best friend, who is female, and I have vowed to grow old together. So, are we married, according to you? I also plan on taking care of my dog for her entire life. Can she be included? Oh, and my relationship with my brother is also life long? Are we also married?
The cultural legality could concievably embrace teens marrying their "PETS"... or "Woobyies even".. down the line...
Our judges have become "SIT DOWN COMICS"..
and the courts have become comedy central..
Which would a pre-requiste to a fully orbed and robed Gomorrah..
Are you sharing a household? If so, according to common-law in at least some states, you are. Otherwise, no.
I also plan on taking care of my dog for her entire life. Can she be included?
No. A dog is not capable of giving consent. Oh, and my relationship with my brother is also life long? Are we also married?
Sanguine relationships are not considered consensual.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.