Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenspan warns against deficits (says to cut social security)
CNN ^ | 02/24/04

Posted on 02/25/2004 7:29:07 AM PST by hoosierboy

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan warned Congress Wednesday to take quick action to fix the nation's swollen budget deficit, saying it could impair the ability to pay Social Security benefits and weigh on the broader economy.


(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deficits; greenspan; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-176 next last
To: hoosierboy
I don't think he said to cut benefits to those receiving them now....it was future benefits he wanted to target , again....

so, we younger baby boomers and those below will again take the brunt of the finacial boondagle that is social security...

now, we will work longer, harder and still get less.....the joke is on us....

whenever they say they are going to "fix" Social Security, I run for cover because all the fix is is people like me working years longer and getting less....

boy, wouldn't it be nice to cut the benefits of those well off seniors now, instead making all the rest of us get shafted.....

we know darn well that there are those who never paid anything into SS and get benefits, those who come to these shores and immediately get benefits, millionaires who get benefits, and of course, a growing "disabled" population that seems to be able to enjoy life, vacation and golf, and travel, yet too "disabled" to work....

yes, its all sour grapes....

101 posted on 02/25/2004 9:30:30 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
SS taxes not=SS taxes now
102 posted on 02/25/2004 9:31:17 AM PST by Cold Heat (In politics stupidity is not a handicap. --Napoleon Bonapart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: hoosierboy
What the CNN article does not tell you is that Greenspan also recommended cutting spending and not raising taxes. How conveniently omitted by CNN!
103 posted on 02/25/2004 9:35:02 AM PST by 38special
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
"And personally, I'd like to see them add means testing to those who remain on the plan."

my simple stab at fairness is that you collect every penny you paid into SS TAX FREE but after that, since its all gravy, you pay income taxes on it where it would apply....

Is that too much to ask?

104 posted on 02/25/2004 9:35:38 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Democrats a huge issue to hang on Bush's neck, bigger than the fay marriage issue

Everyone knows the SS is on the modernization block this year and during the next four.

The system is going to bust in ten years. Either taxes must be increased significantly, or the system must be modernized to the new realities.

those folks in Florida will have no changes to their expectations, but future retirees will need to invest some of what they send in now to help their own retirement situation.

A real change is needed.

There will be no cuts to people getting ready to retire or people in the system now. There simply will not be the same system for the future retirees.

They should not be angry for no reason, but the rats will do their best to get them that way.

105 posted on 02/25/2004 9:38:52 AM PST by Cold Heat (In politics stupidity is not a handicap. --Napoleon Bonapart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: miloklancy
" Being at the virtual bottom of that government pyramid"

I say this with all candor......your parents and grandparents should expect to help you out and leave you a nice sum of money...

if the eldest population, the richest segment of society, insists on supporting this SS scheme, they should be prepared to dole out the money to help younger people, since the younger people are getting the great screw job, IMO, by our Ss system and income taxes in general....

I intend to do that with my kids, am doing that in fact, even though I am far from SS....

Younger people have it hard enough as it is.

106 posted on 02/25/2004 9:40:37 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hoosierboy

Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan warned Congress Wednesday to take quick action to fix the nation's swollen budget deficit, saying it could impair the ability to pay Social Security benefits and weigh on the broader economy.

Not if you privatize SS with tax burden fully in view of the electorate.

The current federal tax system hides much of the tax burden behind the veil of consumer prices:

Make that burden visible to everyone, as in a retail sales tax, and watch the electorate come alive.

23%........... Current effective total federal tax rate with respect to consumption expenditure

14.91% ..... rate if Social Security and Medicare were eliminated
14% .......... rate if Nat'l Endowment for the Arts were eliminated
11.9%........ rate if Dept. of Education were eliminated
10% .......... rate if welfare were eliminated
9.8%.......... rate if foreign aid were eliminated
etc.

As tax rate on sales decreases the economic burden on retail items, the sales volumes and growth in the economy would be tremendous allowing even further reductions in tax rates below a less than 7% level defined by the enumerated powers of the Constitution.

That is what I perceive as the ultimate achievements possible under a National Retail Sales Tax structured in the manner of the revenue bill H.R.25. Simple common sense applied to the principal of TANSTAAFEL,( no free lunch, everyone participates in paying there way in proportion to the benefit the extract from their consumption.) encourages the natural change in attitudes required of the electorate as regards the burden of government largess in their lives.

Thomas Hobbes from Leviathan

Hmmmmmm....... It's do able, with time and effort, once the blinders are removed from the electorate.

107 posted on 02/25/2004 9:41:52 AM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
In politics, as in love and war, timing is everything.

Greenie has a tin ear, should've kept his mouth shut.

This will be used by the Dems, it's the old Repubs want to cut your SS bennies.

Politics gets defined by perceptions, and in America today, perceptions are based on emotions.

And this one heck of an emotional hotbutton issue.
108 posted on 02/25/2004 9:42:44 AM PST by swarthyguy (You have to remember that if you grow thorns, you will not harvest roses -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: cherry
boy, wouldn't it be nice to cut the benefits of those well off seniors now, instead making all the rest of us get shafted.....

That will be coming, perhaps after the more modern system is implemented.

It must be considered as a cost control measure.

It would not help much tho, because those same folks are paying taxes on that income at a pretty high rate.

It will help some.

109 posted on 02/25/2004 9:43:04 AM PST by Cold Heat (In politics stupidity is not a handicap. --Napoleon Bonapart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
I have been preaching privatization of Social Security since the 50's. But, you will not see that happen (unless the government dictates how we invest our money) anytime soon. And if the government does get involved it will get all screwed up.

Government needs to get out of our lives, our wallets, and our banking accounts.

Greenspan needs to take a long hike and forget the way home.

110 posted on 02/25/2004 9:44:51 AM PST by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: CaptainLou
"or even shift the retirement age up one year."

people that say that must be teachers that sit at a desk all day, or bankers...

I am an RN in a busy hospital.....you really want me there when I am 66 or 67 or 68?...trying to lift people, reading the fine print on medicines?....I don't want to be there....

you people with easy jobs, be my guest, work til you 80...

I have an intensly physical, mental, and emotional job and I can't see being able to do it in my sixties....

I guess I can always go the Disability route, which is the only route the govt. is leaving for people with difficult work...

111 posted on 02/25/2004 9:47:25 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Greenie has a tin ear, should've kept his mouth shut.

LOL!

He is like a blabbering idiot, but the rats always parse out stuff to make issues out of.

They look forward to his visits most of the time.

I do not know if anyone else could do better. The rats rarely understand what he says anyway. They get it wrong and we can embarrass them.

112 posted on 02/25/2004 9:48:12 AM PST by Cold Heat (In politics stupidity is not a handicap. --Napoleon Bonapart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Brownie74
Government needs to get out of our lives, our wallets, and our banking accounts.

Nice wish list!:-)

113 posted on 02/25/2004 9:50:33 AM PST by Cold Heat (In politics stupidity is not a handicap. --Napoleon Bonapart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
LOL!! Thanks.
114 posted on 02/25/2004 9:53:59 AM PST by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: cherry
now, we will work longer, harder and still get less.....the joke is on us

Bottom line, the middle class people just keep getting screwed......

115 posted on 02/25/2004 9:55:53 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Politicians may have called SS a pay-as-you-go system, but the pyramid structure of SS was established at its onset when those who had not paid into it were immediately eligible to draw from it. Increased benefits (both by Dems and Pubs) and the greater longevity of Americans have only added to the need for SS to be restructured to a program that requires Americans to take more responsibility for their own retirement. However, since it is certain death to any politician who tries to wean SS recipients from the warmth and safety in the old system, I would not expect any major changes in SS until it begins to collapse from its own weight. Greenspan simply knows that if anything will be done, it is always the Repubicans who are more willing to pick up a hot potato issue and shoot themselves in the foot.

Muleteam1

116 posted on 02/25/2004 9:57:07 AM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Greenspan didn't advocate cuts in SS, just suggested raising the age or changing the COLA figures.

I've seen some proposals that say that simply reducing COLA to be more in-line with inflation along with raising the caps on SS taxable income could easily add 30 years or more to SS's solvency, so I agree with you that fixing SS is relatively easy when compared with Medicare.

I don't know an easy, politically acceptable fix for medicare. My guess is that you'll see more efforts to shift into being a catastrophic program, along with means testing for high income / high wealth recipients.

117 posted on 02/25/2004 10:07:29 AM PST by CaptainLou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants; All
I suppose it would be too much to ask just to cut some of the administrative budget of the SSA. But instead this is what we get:

from www.ssa.gov

President Bush’s proposed $8.53 billion administrative budget for the SSA is the largest increase submitted since we became an independent agency, and recognizes our 5.1% increase in productivity last year. In view of the current fiscal climate, with the demands of national defense and homeland security, the budget clearly demonstrates the President’s support for our programs, which touch the lives of nearly every American.

Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, released the following statement regarding President Bush’s Fiscal Year 2004 budget:

"Today, President Bush proposed an $8.53 billion administrative budget for the Social Security Administration (SSA). This is a 7.5% increase over the FY 2003 budget request. It becomes an 8.5% increase when you adjust for the estimated Medicare hearings costs in FY 2003 that are not in FY 2004. It is more than double the 4% increase the President is proposing for his overall 2004 budget, and is the largest increase submitted since SSA became an independent agency. "What a tremendous vote of confidence from our President! This is a large allocation of resources under any circumstances, but in this fiscal climate – especially with the compelling demands of national defense and homeland security – it is huge. It clearly demonstrates his support for our programs, which touch the lives of nearly every American. This budget will enable us to add 1,000 new SSA employees and over 300 new Disability Determination Service (DDS) employees.

118 posted on 02/25/2004 10:09:41 AM PST by AuntB (Petition to reform SSdisability: http://www.PetitionOnLine.com/SSDC/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hoosierboy
And how will the Left spin this? I expect them to blame it on Bush and his "tax cuts for the wealthy", as they do everything else.
119 posted on 02/25/2004 10:12:35 AM PST by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierboy
I am so tired of the baby boomers drain on Social Security. These are the same people who probably have pensions as well, no pensions for those of us in our 30's
120 posted on 02/25/2004 10:14:31 AM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson