To: Constitution Day; dighton; Poohbah; Tijeras_Slim; hellinahandcart; L,TOWM; BlueLancer
Momentum, indeed. Sounds like someone could use a physics refresher.
Let's assume he fell 30 meters, or just shy of 100 feet. Given that d = 0.5 * g * t2, neglecting air resistance, we see that 30 = 0.5 * 9.8 m/s2 * t2. Solving for t, we see that the time t before impact was about 2.5 seconds, give or take. The final, "impact" velocity, then, given by the equation vf = g * t, must have been 9.8 m/s2 * 2.5, or 24.5 m/s, more or less, or about 55 miles per hour.
35 posted on
02/24/2004 12:31:27 PM PST by
general_re
(Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant. - Tacitus)
To: general_re
Therefore, though not technically correct, in this case you could say that 55mph was his terminal velocity.
To: general_re
or about 55 miles per hour.Well at least he wasn't speeding.
56 posted on
02/24/2004 12:52:48 PM PST by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
To: general_re
...24.5 m/s, more or less, or about 55 miles per hour.Well done.
It's not the falling, it's that sudden stopping, you know.
To: general_re
11 Stories is a lot more than 30 metres -- I make it to be about double that, 60m/200 ft. He'd have been closing in on a tumbling person's terminal velocity of 35-40 m/sec -- an unsurvivable impact (about 60-70 kilojoules), absent highly unusual circumstances in the deceleration.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson