To: txdoda
I noted that. I'm for the states exercising all rights stated under the Constitution (especially governors telling the feds to stuff mandates), but cooperation on IDs is sorely needed. This one time when the excuse of "national security" would be warranted is shuffled to the side in favor of business as usual. Meanwhile the terrorists continue planning the next big hit, laughing at our inability to govern ourselves effectively.
65 posted on
02/24/2004 11:00:10 PM PST by
NewRomeTacitus
(Kitties take no prisoners. They kick litter over them.)
To: NewRomeTacitus
I'm for the states exercising all rights stated under the Constitution (especially governors telling the feds to stuff mandates), but cooperation on IDs is sorely needed. This one time when the excuse of "national security" would be warranted is shuffled to the side in favor of business as usual.>>>>>>
Agreed........the feds (GWB) should have *ruled* on DL & 'acceptance of ANY foreign ID's right after 9-11. Had they, this would be TWO major problems the states would not be divided on right now.
I guess with your 'foreign ID' you can board planes & visit the INS in our federal buildings, etc., & the states still issuing DL to illegals *could be legalizing* the next batch of terrorists.
Not addressing just these two issues, leaves a major hole in any "Homeland Security".
66 posted on
02/24/2004 11:45:01 PM PST by
txdoda
("Navy-brat")
To: NewRomeTacitus; All
69 posted on
02/25/2004 1:01:58 AM PST by
JustPiper
(The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson