What Bush vs Kerry is really all about

Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

Forget the current hullabaloo regarding the thirty some odd year old service records of the two candidates and all the other hysterical, hypocritical, hyperbolic horse hockey being raised by the Democrats and their operatives.

Here's the commonsense bottom line of what the coming election is about:

Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to surrender our national sovereignty, our national security and our national defense to the United Nations and other so-called world government bodies. The Democrats do not believe that war is sometimes necessary to defend the nation and or our national interests. The Democrats do not believe that the United States has the right to self-defense. The Democrats do not care about our national security or defending our national sovereignty. It's not in their game plan. In fact their game plan includes acquiescing to the United Nations, a world court and a world government. There's absolutely no doubt about it. It's in the record.

Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to increase our taxes and continue increasing our taxes until they totally destroy our economy and our ability to compete in world markets. Bush is a sworn tax cutter. Kerry is a sworn tax raiser. No doubt about it. It's in the record.

Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to kiss off our traditional man/woman marriage and from this point on it'll be anything goes. Bush defends traditional family values and a moral society. Kerry promotes the feminist/abortionist/homosexualist agenda, no matter how absurd, perverse, abhorrent or evil. No doubt about it. It's in the record.

Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to appoint and confirm nothing but NOW/NAMBLA/Globalist approved feminist/abortionist/homosexualist liberal activist judges. Bush will appoint judges who will abide by the Constitution. Kerry and the Democrats will appoint and confirm only liberal activist judges. Allow this and we can kiss our Constitution and what's left of our national sovereignty and freedom goodbye. No doubt about it. It's in the record. Period. End of story.

[4.1O dana super trac pak]

OK

[Pelham]

ping

[JustPiper]

BUSH

KERRY

Zogby Homepage

[GOP_1900AD]

Actually, what you've got there is the old red - blue map at the state level from 2000. Zogby ran a poll that showed more or less the same results in red and blue states. The key would be numbers of delegates now Vs. then, even a small shift would be bad for Bush. Bush needs to grab one or more of the upper midwest blue states if he wants to avoid another fiasco, plus he needs to solidify his base in the red states, some of which were not red by much in 2K (witness WVA and NH). The biggest problem for the GOP is that CA has become a blue state - we were a red state prior to the 1990s.

[Khan Noonian Singh]

Take the long view.

The long-run goal is for liberalism to disintegrate, and for the Democratic Party as we know it to fall apart.

Once the Democratic Party implodes, the Republican Party will split in two. Half the Republicans will leave for a new party or to take over the empty shell of the failed Democratic Party just for the political infrastructure.

At that time in the future, our two major parties will be a Liberty Party and a RINO Party, whatever they are named.

This will only happen if the Democrats lose at the polls again and again and again. It won't happen this year yet. But it will happen some day. That is why I vote Republican.